What's Behind the Fed's Decision to Raise Interest Rates in a Stumbling Economy?With a new recession threatening, Yellen HAS to raise rates
by: Dave Lindorff, January 8, 2016
Much has been written and broadcast over the past few weeks in the financial media and the business pages of general-interest newspapers debating the wisdom of the decision in December by Fed Chair Janet Yellen and the Federal Reserve Board to raise interest rates for the first time in almost a decade.
On one side of this debate are people who say that the Fed needs to do this to prevent inflation from taking off. On the other side are people who warn that pushing up interest rates at a time when unemployment is still at a historically high level (and when real unemployment is more than double the official 5% rate) risks making things worse.
The increase of 0.25% in the Federal Reserve's benchmark federal funds rate -- the rate banks charge each other for holding short-term funds -- was pretty minimal, but the arguments for raising the rate at all are absurd on their face.
The New York Times quoted Yellen as saying interest rates needed to be pushed up lest the economy begin "overheating"! As she put it, had rates not been raised last month, ""We would likely end up having to tighten policy (meaning raising rates) relatively abruptly to prevent the economy from overheating," which she said could then throw the US back into recession.
What planet, or more specifically, what national economy does Yellen inhabit?
The US is so far from being an "overheating" economy it's not funny. Official unemployment has remained stalled at 5.1% for three months now, but that is really a bogus number created during the Clinton administration when the Labor Department obligingly eliminated longer-term unemployed people who had given up trying to find a job from the tally of the unemployed, so their numbers wouldn't embarrass the administration. The real unemployment rate -- called the U-6 rate by the Labor Dept.-- which includes discouraged workers who have temporarily stopped trying to find nonexistent jobs, as well as people who are involuntarily working at part-time jobs but who want to return to full-time employment, is actually still above 10%. And if people who have simply left the labor market because there is no work for them, are added in, as they really should be, the the real jobless rate rises to 22.9%, or almost one in four working-age Americans.
Anyone who thinks an economy with that much slack in its labor force is in danger of imminent "overheating", as defined by rising pressures on wages and rising prices due to increased demand for goods and services, is nuts.
Raising interest rates in a economy that's still in a funk makes no sense...unless you think the economy's about to tank and you are stuck at a 0% with nowhere to drop rates as a stimulus.
Another argument offered for raising rates now has been a supposed need to "reassure" investors (this at a time that equities markets are trading at something around a frothy 18X future earnings, which hardly suggests investors who are in need of encouragement!).
Here all one can do is stare dumbfounded at whoever makes such idiotic statements, Yellen included. Investors do not want to see interest rates go up! They never do. In fact, anytime interest rates get raised, you can watch equities markets drop. That's how it works, and in fact we're seeing it happen now, with markets down almost 10% in the new year -- making 2016 the worst start of a new year in stock-market history..
So what's really going on here?
My own theory is that the Federal Reserve Board recognizes that its gimmick of pumping up equities markets artificially through former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke's "quantitative easing" ploy of basically printing free speculative cash to hand to Wall Street Banks at no interest -- a popular give-away to the rich that has done nothing for the average American -- is running out of gas. The US economy, which has never really recovered from the 2007 crash and subsequent Great Recession, is starting to wheeze and gasp for air. A new recession is looking increasingly likely even though there never really was a recovery from the last one. (How could there have been in an economy that depends for 70% of economic activity on consumer spending, but where those "consumers" are still experiencing reduced income in real dollars from what they were earning in the 1990s, their savings and home values are still shriveled, and many are actually unemployed.)
So put yourself in the Fed's shoes. A new recession, quite possibly even worse than the disastrous one we just went though, is in the offing, and the only tool the Federal Reserve has in a country where both parties have ditched Keynesianism and just want to cut (non-military) government spending, when it comes to trying to stimulate the economy, is cutting interest rates.
And you cannot cut interest rates that are already at 0%.
This means the Fed has to raise interest rates now and in short order, probably getting the rate back up to at least 1% or maybe more by year's end, if only so that it can then knock the rate back down again in hopes of trying to get investors and companies investing again.
Nobody in authority is going to say that. The official line, echoed obligingly by the media talking heads and "experts," continues to be that things are great, the economy is "growing," unemployment is "falling," and America is "back."
The really funny part about this charade is that when the interest rate in a country is raised, one of the immediate impacts of that move is that that country's currency then rises against other currencies where interest rates stay put or fall. Not surprisingly, the dollar is continuing to rise against the Euro, the Yen, the British Pound Sterling and the Chinese Renminbi. That is hardly what the US needs, since a rising dollar means that what goods are still produced in the US become more expensive to foreign buyers, making them less competitive, and thus damaging economic activity and employment in the US. It also means foreign goods are cheaper for US buyers, and so people turn to imports at the expense of domestic producers -- again not a great thing for an economy in a slump.
No matter. It's clear that the Fed, even if it cannot bring itself to be honest about what it's doing, feels it needs to get interest rates back up before the bottom falls out of the US economy once again.
This time, of course, it won't be the bottom falling out of a new car. It will be more like an 20-year-old Karman Ghia I once owned where you could look down and watch the road go by through shoe-sized holes in the rusted-out floor panels, and the pieces will just keep falling off making those holes even bigger.
Watch for it. more
Thursday, January 14, 2016
The world's central bankers have painted themselves into a corner. Since the early 1980s when Paul Volcker made naked usury public policy in USA, when he raised the prime to over 21% in a brutal attempt to curb inflation, we have seen the central bankers make successful attempts to slow dow the economy while their attempts to get the economy to grow have been pathetic. The worst side effect of usury as public policy is that it bred a whole generation of people who are hyper-vigilent about the possibility, however remote, that inflation is about to break out. And that the "good" fight against inflation is always worth fighting because it gives added powers and riches to the creditor classes.
Russia was confronted with sanctions over Crimea / Ukraine in 2014 which caused shortages that led to an outbreak of inflation. As "luck" would have it, their central bank was being led by a Yale-educated economist named Elvira Nabiullina who immediately hiked interest rates. And like the prescription for blood-letting of old, this policy immediately made things MUCH worse. We tend to forget that when the USSR abandoned Marxism, the advisors who swooped in to "help" were some of the most doctrinaire neoliberals on the planet. Russia has recovered a little since 1991, but not much, because most of her new leadership became enthusiastic neoliberals—including Putin.
Lest we in USA gloat, our newly minted Fed chief is just as goofy as her Russian counterpart. They are singing from the same hymnal, after all. So even though the global economy is teetering on the brink of a major slowdown, Janet Yellen announced in December that USA would raise its prime rate. Below we see Dave Lindorff try to make some sense out of a move so obviously foolish. I am glad someone is trying because I have pretty much come to the conclusion that such central banker "wisdom" is probably just another manifestation of dementia.