Sunday, August 16, 2026

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 16, 2026

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 16, 2026

by Tony Wikrent

 

War on voting

How Many States Does It Take to Steal an Election? One, and It Already Happened. Texas alone handed over 18 million voter records and signed a removal agreement.

Christopher Armitage, Aug 13, 2026 [The Existentialist Republic]

Eighteen states have handed their complete voter files to the Trump Justice Department, the drivers license and Social Security numbers of every registered voter included. Between them, those eighteen states hold 148 US House seats, 36 Senate seats, and 184 electoral votes, roughly two thirds of what it takes to run the House, the Senate, and the White House.

A March 2025 executive order ordered states to change how they run elections and threatened to withhold federal money from the ones that refused to comply. The Justice Department went straight for the data, asking all 50 states and the District of Columbia to hand over their voter files. The Department of Homeland Security rebuilt a dormant database called SAVE so states could run those files through it for citizenship checks.

A second order, in March 2026, told the Postal Service to deliver ballots only to voters on a federally approved list. Financial pressure was also applied via grant conditions that make states rewrite their election rules and run their rolls through SAVE or lose 20 percent of their homeland security funding, a program worth more than a billion dollars. DHS made those conditions official in July, and two dozen states sued within two weeks....

 

A New Draft Rule for the Census Seeks Sweeping Changes to How Political Power Is Allocated - PM is publishing the Trump administration’s plan for changes to political apportionment and Census data collection.

Layla A. Jones and Josh Kovensky,  08.11.26 [Talking Points Memo]

 

War

Pentagon Drafting New Nuclear Strategy To Expand Options for Tactical Nuclear Weapons Use 

[Antiwar.com, via Naked Capitalism 08-11-2026]

Previously reported via Scott Ritter but important not to miss.

 

Deep Intel on Carrier LINCOLN's Morale Crisis (YouTube video)

Ward Carroll, August 14, 2026 [YouTube]

4:53

The problem started with the loss of Fifth Fleet headquarters due to Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks early in the war, which some war planners might describe as a single point failure. According to Vice Admiral Verisimo, quote, "When Bahrain was no longer a port for logistics, food and mail, all the gear that was there when the shooting started got stuck there." So that was an initial very large backlog. That also caused us to undergo very contested logistics, very difficult and long supply lines, we had to prioritize food, which was also a challenge and remains on occasion to be a challenge. End quote.

 

Deadly clash aboard US carrier Abraham Lincoln leaves seven dead, several injured: Report

[Press TV, via Naked Capitalism 08-12-2026]

Seven US Navy personnel have reportedly been killed and several others wounded in a violent clash aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, as growing unrest among the carrier’s crew has exposed mounting pressure inside the US military amid a prolonged deployment.

The incident erupted after an adviser to US Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Brad Cooper boarded the carrier to address mounting complaints from crew members following protests by their families over the ship’s prolonged deployment, according to Tasnim News Agency, citing an informed military source.

The adviser was reportedly met with boos and had water bottles thrown at him while addressing a gathering of personnel.

The confrontation subsequently escalated into a fight among crew members involving knives and other bladed weapons, leaving seven personnel dead and several others wounded, according to the source....

 

Multiple USS Abraham Lincoln sailors have tried to go overboard amid extended deployment, families say

[Military Times, via Naked Capitalism 08-12-2026]

 

U.S. has lost 45 MQ-9 Reaper drones, roughly 25% of fleet, in Iran war

[Washington Post, summarized by Drop Site Daily: August 14, 2026]

The U.S. military has lost at least 45 MQ-9 Reaper drones during its war with Iran, representing about a quarter of the pre-war fleet and a potential taxpayer cost exceeding $1.3 billion, according to three officials cited by The Washington Post on Friday.

 

Ukrainian drones wipe out entire US tank brigade in live war game 

[Ars Technica, via Naked Capitalism 08-14-2026]

 

How Iran Adapted Its Attacks as U.S. War Munitions Dwindled

[New York Times

 

Russian Arena-M Active Protection System Finally Comes of Age on the Battlefield

[Simplicius, via Naked Capitalism 08-11-2026]

...As a first quick background, the Arena-M was originally created to stop various munitions like ATGMs and Javelins, including from “top attack” mode. These are obviously no longer a problem compared to the pervasiveness of drones. But here is test footage of an Arena-M system on a T-72B3M intercepting a small missile from a top-attack and direct trajectory as example of how it works:

The system works by having a small millimeter-wave doppler radar which detects incoming projectiles and then launches a hard-kill countermeasure that is timed and fused to explode near the tank which showers the incoming projectile with shrapnel.

Now, in a recent assault in the Dobropillya direction out of Shakhove, near Pokrovsk, Russian forces reportedly used tanks with these Arena-M systems for the first time. Footage released by the Azov Corp which defends the area showed one possible shoot down of an FPV drone by the Arena system....

But the shocker was that major pro-Ukrainian figures which included American analyst Rob Lee and a Ukrainian Special Operations veteran Dmytro Putiata spoke to the Azov units involved in the attack and learned that the Arena-M system actually worked remarkably well....

 

Trump not violating any law

'He who saves his Country does not violate any Law'

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025

 

Trump Makes Crime Legal

James Baratta, August 14, 2026 [The American Prospect]

The Paris-based Financial Action Task Force, a global money laundering and terrorist financing watchdog, has likened shell companies to a “getaway car” for illicit actors. For transnational criminal networks and foreign kleptocrats alike, shell companies have been instrumental in hiding assets from the prying eyes of governmental authorities. This is precisely why Congress, with strong bipartisan support, passed the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) as part of the National Defense Authorization Act six years ago. Moreover, when Secretary of State Marco Rubio was a U.S. senator in 2020, he touted the CTA as “the most significant anti-corruption and money laundering law in decades.”

A key plank of the CTA requires American companies and individuals to report beneficial ownership information to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, which defines beneficial owners as having at least a 25 percent stake in, or “substantial control” over a company. But that requirement is going away.

The Treasury Department has published its final rule permanently exempting companies and individuals in the U.S. from disclosing beneficial ownership information. The rule also deletes all beneficial ownership data that domestic companies have already submitted to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. The Treasury Department stopped enforcing the beneficial ownership information reporting requirement for American companies and individuals when it first announced the rule in March 2025. Law enforcement groups, national security experts, and small business associations have since been sounding the alarm on the rule and calling on the Treasury Department to reverse course....

 

A Green Light for Crooks - The Treasury has made the American economy a safe space for corruption.

Casey Michel, August 14, 2026 [The Atlantic]

 

[X-Twitter, via Naked Capitalism 08-14-2026]

Wally Rashid
@wallyrashid
This means if foreigners decide to create a shell company in Delaware to fund superPACs in elections, which is illegal, there is no way of knowing. Here is AIPACs lobbying disclosure form showing they lobbied the Treasury Department and State Department on pushing this through.
 

Birthright Citizenship, Redux 

[Steve Vladeck, via Naked Capitalism 08-11-2026]

 

Trump Wants Black People Barred From Med School

Naomi Bethune, August 14, 2026 [The American Prospect]

By targeting medical schools for prioritizing diversity, the Trump administration insists on a century-old belief that Black people are unequipped to practice medicine....

PRIOR TO THE SUPREME COURT’S 2023 decision, the number of Black medical students was slowly trending upward. In 2024, however, the enrollment of Black medical school students fell nearly 12 percent. The Trump administration’s assault on medical school admissions practices that encouraged enrolling students from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds will only compound this decline....

 

 

Heather Cox Richardson, Aug 14, 2026 [Letters from an American]

On August 10, ICE published a notice that it would spend up to $20 million on shock gloves that deliver a painful charge of electricity to subdue individuals. Jeremy White of Wired reported today that the glove is supposed to subdue someone in three seconds or less and the manufacturer warns that the device should not be used for longer than 15 seconds; no more than one pair should be used at the same time on one person; that operators must touch only arms or legs, strictly avoiding head, face, throat, chest, and groin; that gloves must not be used on the elderly, children, pregnant women, or people with severe disabilities; and that the technology must not be used to stop people from talking back, as punishment, or to torture.

 

The Five Scandals Within the "Air Force One" Scandal - Donald Trump, a Catering Truck, and the Qatari "Air Force One" represent a Russian Nesting Doll of Scandal and Corruption

Garrett Graff, August 12, 2026 [Doomsday Scenario]

 

Strategic Political Economy

Surveillance vs guillotines

Cory Doctorow, August 11, 2026 [Pluralistic]

In the summer of 2013, two esoteric, technical, incredibly important texts were published within weeks of one another: the first is the Snowden leaks, which revealed a system of global, pervasive digital surveillance; the second was Thomas Piketty's Capital in the 21st Century, a book about the economic inevitability (and political instability) of oligarchy:

https://memex.craphound.com/2014/06/24/thomas-pikettys-capital-in-the-21st-century/ ....

Piketty's landmark volume was grounded in a detailed analysis of 300 years' (!) worth of global capital flows, painstakingly compiled by a large team of grad students from a massive set of heterogeneous records. The book's conclusion is the statement that "returns to capital exceed the rate of growth over the long term" (abbreviated as "r > g").

This may sound innocuous, but it is explosive. If r > g, then the most wealth will inevitably accumulate in the hands of people who start with the most wealth, irrespective of whether they do anything productive with that money. This means that the alleged heroes of the market system – the entrepreneurs who found and manage the firms that increase public prosperity – are doomed to play second fiddle to the mere plumbers of money, people who "contribute" by accumulating....

Piketty shows that this holds true across markets and nations and eras: all other things being equal, the market system produces a class of hereditary aristocrats who command the world's capital and direct its deployment, despite never having done anything. The market's most lavish rewards do not go to its most productive participants, but rather, to those participants who have the good fortune to emerge from the luckiest of orifices....

Take Bill Gates: his ideological projects have been a catastrophe. A patent maximalist, he funded the lobbyists who successfully blocked South Africa from producing its own AIDS drugs under an IP waiver program, and then deployed them again to stop the Global South from making their own covid vaccines:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/13/public-interest-pharma/#gates-foundation

Closer to home, Gates's hatred of public institutions led him to allocate millions to dismantling public schools and replacing them with charter schools, particularly for poor and racialized kids, with disastrous results:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/09/autocrats-of-trade-2/#witness-the-firepower-of-this-fully-armed-and-operational-battle-station

And of course, Gates supported and empowered Jeffrey Epstein and his rape island:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates#Connection_with_Jeffrey_Epstein

Capital's tendency to accumulate in the hands of the already wealthy (r > g) means that these aristocrats end up setting an ever-larger proportion of our societal agenda, despite their manifest unfitness to govern and their absence of any kind of democratic legitimacy....

The Trump years are proof of this. We've reached a high-water mark for rule by illegitimate billionaire dilettantes. The second Trump admin began with DOGE's Bonfire of the Stupidities, where Musk cultists dismantled vast swathes of the American administrative state. Musk didn't just attack foreign aid – though the fact that the world's richest man murdered hundreds of thousands of the world's poorest children for the lulz isn't merely cruel, but also massively destabilizing in a way that will shake the world's politics for generations – but also domestic institutions. It was a DOGE cultist who fed the part of the NIH that tracks cyclosporin outbreaks into the wood-chipper:

https://truthout.org/articles/disease-researchers-blame-doge-cuts-for-spiraling-cyclospora-outbreak/

Today, tens of thousands of Americans are experiencing the literal enshittification of the American state, and this isn't just a human tragedy (though it is), it's also an economic tragedy, with massive knock-on effects for the businesses that rely on those sickened Americans and for the agricultural sector whose outputs are now being shunned by millions. Whether it's letting Bill Gates decide how your schools will work or letting Elon Musk decide how your public health system runs, the result is political chaos and a societal nudge away from the rule of law and towards guillotines.

Which brings me back to Snowden. The Snowden revelations did spur a global conversation about digital surveillance, with the result that the majority of the world's digital traffic is encrypted today. That's not nothing.

But the American state found new ways to conduct mass-scale, global surveillance, often by collaborating directly with tech giants. Billionaires like Peter Thiel capitalized on Big Tech's conflicted feelings about openly participating in surveillance by founding Palantir, with the express mission of murdering the political opponents of oligarchy:

https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2026/01/07/palantir-kill-communists/

Over the past decade, the steady march of digital technology, dominated by a cartel of giant global firms who collude with the US government's system of political repression in exchange for tax breaks, antitrust forbearance and fat federal contracts has yielded more mass surveillance productivity gains than the previous 25 years:

https://apnews.com/article/trump-inauguration-tech-billionaires-zuckerberg-musk-wealth-0896bfc3f50d941d62cebc3074267ecd

The Trump administration is the most unpopular in more than a century. Trump has stolen more money in office than any president in history. Trump presides over spiraling greedflation and collapsing buying power. The Trump administration has also presided over a titanic increase in state-aligned, privatized surveillance. The Trump years are the Flock years:

https://newrepublic.com/article/206992/flock-safety-cameras-alpr-deflock-resistance-nationwide

The Trump years are the Palantir years:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/technology/trump-palantir-data-americans.html

The Trump years are the facial recognition years:

https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/ice-face-recognition

Trump's authoritarianism is a function of his misrule, and his misrule is enabled by his authoritarianism. The more he steals, the more he destroys with wars of choice, and incoherent tariff policies, and official pronouncements linking autism and vaccinations, the more he needs spy cameras, internet surveillance, vehicle tracking, and facial recognition. Every time Trump talks about a third term in office, or canceling elections, or suppressing the vote, he creates demand for mass surveillance to catch and imprison the people this drives into the streets. The more mass surveillance there is, the safer it is for him to commit unpopular, corrupt acts. It's the world's worst self-licking ice-cream cone.

It's not just Trump, of course. Trump is the vanguard of a movement of orifice lottery winners whose delight in stealing, cheating, maiming and despoiling gives rise to political instability and requires them to divert some of their yacht money to mercenaries:

https://theintercept.com/2026/06/25/police-luigi-mangione-wealthy-ceos-threat/....

 

Why Peace Would Spell Ruin for the Global Elites

[Forvm Geopolitica, via Naked Capitalism 08-10-2026]

 

Global power shift

Why the Mecca Agreement is a necessary show of force 

[Middle East Eye, via Naked Capitalism 08-11-2026]

... What finally pushed Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who had spent billions investing in US President Donald Trump, to sign a mutual defence pact with Turkey and Pakistan will be a matter for historians to work out.

But at a guess, I would say the Chinese have it right. So far there has been no official statement from the Chinese foreign ministry, but the official Xinhua agency put it like this:"America is unreliable: Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan sign a defence agreement."

China could have taken the view that the pact is an 'Islamic Nato', but it does not. Rather, it views this pact as a direct result of the US and Israel’s military disaster in Iran.

Xinhua quoted Yan Xuetong, dean emeritus of the Institute of International Relations at Tsinghua University, who said that the war has not only prompted the Arab nations under the US military umbrella to question Washington’s actual military strength, but also its ability to protect them.

Regional states had come to realise that their national security "can not depend on the United States, but must depend on themselves", Xuetong said.

 

The Great Solar Wall: China doubles down on its ambitious effort to tame deserts

Victoria Bela, 6 Aug 2026 [South China Morning Post]

... Solar is poised to overtake coal as China’s largest source of installed power capacity by the end of the year, with much of it under construction in its western and northern regions, including Inner Mongolia and the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, with their abundant sunshine and land.

In 2022, China’s National Development and Reform Commission issued a plan to build large-scale wind and solar projects in the arid regions – including the Gobi Desert – to reach an installed capacity of 455 gigawatts by 2030, according to Xinhua.
This would be equivalent to the capacity of around 20 of China’s Three Gorges – the largest hydroelectric facility in the world – and more than seven times the planned Yarlung Tsangpo mega-dam project.
 
[Tom’s Hardware, via Naked Capitalism 08-09-2026]
 
 
He Huifengin, 10 Aug 2026 [South China Morning Post 
 

Gaza / Palestine / Israel

Israel’s campaign to make southern Lebanon ‘unliveable’

Raya Jalabi in Beirut and Aditi Bhandari in London, Aug 12 2026 [via Naked Capitalism 08-15-2026]

An FT visual investigation with journalism non-profit Lighthouse Reports found systematic destruction across Israeli-occupied southern Lebanon, including tens of thousands of homes, schools, farmland and forests.
 
Analysis of satellite imagery, open-source data and verified footage shows that much of the damage occurred after Israeli forces established control over emptied villages in mid-April. It has rendered large areas uninhabitable, destroying systems needed for civilian life, from water and energy infrastructure to medical care, a tactic rights groups and legal experts say appears designed to prevent residents’ return.
 
“It’s an extensive, long-lasting and organised attack on the people of southern Lebanon,” said Kristine Beckerle, a deputy director at rights group Amnesty International. “If you raze everything to the ground, critical infrastructure and healthcare, if you scorch the earth, you are creating effective wastelands that are unliveable and making it very difficult for people to return to southern Lebanon.”
 
But weeks into the latest conflict, defence minister Israel Katz invoked a different approach, one used with devastating consequences after Hamas’s October 7 2023 attack: the “Rafah and Beit Hanoun model”, a reference to Israel’s wholesale levelling of cities in Gaza. “All homes in Lebanese villages near the border will be destroyed,” Katz said.
 
By July, Katz claimed his threat had been carried out. “Twenty-four Lebanese villages, hundreds of years old, we destroyed all the buildings,” he said, boasting that up to 20,000 homes had been demolished. “Not house by house, but entire villages.”
 

Oligarchy

The Golden Billion and the New Malthusian Order 

[MultiPolar Press, via Naked Capitalism 08-11-2026]

Konstantin Malofeev, the Russian businessman, Orthodox conservative, and founder of the Tsargrad media group, has issued a stark warning about what he sees as the emerging politics of global depopulation. His argument about the “Golden Billion” begins from a simple observation. The rulers of the richest countries speak more and more often about limits: limits to population, limits to consumption, limits to energy use, limits to travel, limits to economic growth. At the same time, those who preach these limits rarely live within them. Malofeev points to a recent study proposing that the world population should fall to roughly four billion by 2200, helped by a global fertility rate of about 1.75 children per woman. He places this beside older arguments associated with the Club of Rome, the population politics of wealthy philanthropists, the private discussions of men such as Jeffrey Epstein and Peter Thiel, and the growing power of artificial intelligence. His conclusion is that these are not merely separate curiosities. They belong to a way of thinking in which human beings are treated as a burden to be reduced, measured, redirected, and controlled. The phrase “Golden Billion” gives this way of thinking a name. It does not require us to believe that a committee has written down a plan to kill seven billion people. The charge is both simpler and more serious: a small class that already possesses most of the wealth and power is building a world in which it will need fewer workers, tolerate fewer independent nations, and demand ever greater restraint from everyone below it. Malofeev is right to treat this prospect as a political danger rather than as an innocent exercise in scientific planning.

 

Felonomics

USAID fallout: In Nepal, when the aid workers stopped coming, the women and babies started dying 

[AP, via Naked Capitalism 08-14-2026]

 

How Scott Bessent used financial engineering to finance the $2 trillion deficit while leaving it untouched—and created a $1.45 trillion shortfall 

[Fortune, via Naked Capitalism 08-09-2026]

 

Booming Oil Profits Show Why Policymakers Can’t “Wait and See” on Gas Prices | Washington Monthly

Dylan Gyauch-Lewis, August 14, 2026 [Washington Monthly]

Recent days have seen oil companies report blowout profits on earnings call after earnings call for the second quarter of 2026—the first quarter to fully reflect the impact of Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Chevron posted its highest quarterly profits ever. BP’s profits more than doubled year-over-year. Exxon also doubled its year-over-year earnings, despite losing 10 percent of its upstream production. Those three firms alone raked in average daily oil profits of over $400 million

It isn’t surprising that the closure of the strait would benefit fossil fuel companies less reliant on the output of Middle Eastern oilfields. One particularly interesting dynamic, however, is that windfall profits are coming not just from firms’ “upstream” crude extraction segments, but also their “downstream” refining operations—which should, in theory, see thinner margins when crude prices (their input costs) are high.

Quite the opposite, refining margins have boomed over recent months. To take one example, BP’s refining margin was $12 per barrel last year. In the second quarter of this year, it was $30 per barrel, and it has reached $42 per barrel in the third.

 

Trump Opens Door to Foreign-Built Warships in Major Navy Shipbuilding Overhaul 

[gCaptain[X-Twitter, via Naked Capitalism 08-14-2026]

 

U.S. Budget Deficit Hits July Record at $432 Billion

[Economic Insider, August 14, 2026]

 

The carnage of mainstream neoliberal economics

If You Get in a Car Crash, the Risk Is Growing Your Insurance Won’t Pay

[Wall Street Journal, via Naked Capitalism 08-10-2026]

 

Capital formation - Funny thing about competition: there's both a pro-market and an anti-market case for a competitive system

Cory Doctorow, August 14, 2026 [Pluralistic]

 

Health care crisis

Big Medicine Profits By Denying Care Your Doctor Ordered. My Father Paid the Price - Insurance companies increasingly own the very entities that adjudicate the requests for care, and they make money every time they say “no.”

The Economic Populist, Aug 10, 2026 [Economi

c Liberties]

The practice of health insurance conglomerates requiring prior authorization for medical treatment — in many cases, medically necessary treatments — and their corporate affiliates then adjudicating those requests for coverage has become not just a massive, costly barrier between patients and the care their doctors prescribe, but one that threatens the health and lives of patients. In a new report, Economic Liberties calls for banning prior authorization as it exists today, rife with conflicts of interest. We document how the practice erodes care quality while inflating costs.

In conjunction with the report, co-author Hannah Garden-Monheit, a senior fellow at Economic Liberties, published an op-ed at MS NOW, recounting how her own father paid the price for needless denials....

 

Yale Study: Medicare for All Would Save Over 114,000 Lives and $1 Trillion a Year

Jessica Corbett, August 11, 2026 [CommonDreams]Previous research has shown that shifting the United States to a Medicare for All system could save roughly 68,000 lives and $650 billion per year, but a new study by experts at Yale University suggests the savings would likely be even greater on both fronts.

 

A New Piece of the Puzzle of Covid’s Origin

[The New Atlantis, via Naked Capitalism 08-09-2026]

 

Predatory finance

THE GREAT FINANCIAL CRISIS OF 2007-2009 WAS FIRST AND FOREMOST A LIQUIDITY CRISIS: LESSONS FOR THE DATA CENTER FINANCIAL CRISIS DEBATE

[Notes on the Crises

 

They’re not capitalists — they’re predatory criminals

Why Power Hates Palestine 

[BettBeat, via Naked Capitalism 08-14-2026]

 

Zorro Ranch, Jeffrey Epstein, and Donald Trump's Justice Department

Joyce Vance, Aug 11, 2026 [Civil Discourse]

Last week, New Mexico’s Attorney General Raúl Torrez sued DOJ for access to unredacted Epstein-related investigative files that he says the Justice Department has been withholding. He alleges in his lawsuit that in 2019, the Department “directed” the state to pause an initial criminal investigation into Epstein’s activities at Zorro Ranch outside of Santa Fe, and promised “to share relevant information when their work concluded.” That would have been during the first Trump administration.

The lawsuit accuses DOJ of “refusing to facilitate the investigation of state law crimes by hiding information about Epstein and his co-conspirators from Attorney General Torrez and state law enforcement, when New Mexico is one of few jurisdictions that still may have an opportunity to hold Epstein’s associates accountable or otherwise provide some sense of justice to survivors....

 

Bombshell Uncovered: Evidence Shows Blanche Likely Committed Witness Bribery, Evidence Tampering, and Conspiracy in New Mexico. Those Crimes Carry at Least Seven and a Half Years in State Prison.

Christopher Armitage, Aug 09, 2026 [The Existentialist Republic]

Sufficient evidence rests in the public record, and opening a criminal investigation requires far less than proof beyond a reasonable doubt. This all rests on the New Mexico Attorney General.

 

 

Controversial group wins $158M-contract to represent unaccompanied immigrant children 

[NPR, via Naked Capitalism 08-14-2026]

[Conor Gallagher: "Not a good look, especially considering  Epstein’s links to Customs and Border Protection."]

 

Fiasco in the Factory: Taxpayers Funded a $533 Million Artillery Plant That Made Nothing

Jesse Coburn, August 12, 2026 [ProPublica]

General Dynamics opened a Texas factory to churn out artillery shells for Ukraine, but the machines kept breaking. Robot arms smashed into things. Hunks of metal crashed to the floor. There was even a real-life dumpster fire.

 

Restoring balance to the economy

Mamdani Backs Proposal to End Amazon’s ‘Exploitative’ Delivery Model in New York City

Julia Conley, August 11, 2026 [CommonDreams]

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has thrown his support behind legislation that could become a first-in-the-nation law to regulate Amazon’s network of subcontractors that deliver the $3 trillion company’s packages—an “exploitative business model” that shields the e-commerce giant from accountability, as Mamdani said Monday.

The Democratic mayor endorsed the Delivery Protection Act, proposed by New York City Council Member Tiffany Cabán, which would establish new safety, training, and labor standards for “last-mile” warehouses and distribution facilities in New York City, and hold the companies that operate the facilities, such as Amazon and FedEx, liable for employing the workers who make hundreds of deliveries per day across the city....

According to a report by the Office of the Comptroller in New York City last year, 78% of areas surrounding last-mile facilities saw an increase in injury-causing crashes after the warehouses opened.

“Corporations like Amazon build billion-dollar business models by insulating themselves from accountability through a system of exploitative subcontracting,” said Mamdani in a statement. “As last-mile delivery centers have exploded across New York, so too have traffic accidents and worker injuries. The Delivery Protection Act is commonsense regulation that protects delivery workers, safeguards the communities where these facilities operate, and ensures that the corporations benefiting from workers’ labor are responsible for the consequences of their business practices.” ....

 

Disrupting mainstream economics

Understanding economics: What is the economy for?

Richard Murphy, August 10, 2026 [Funding the Future]

 

Infographic: What is the economy for?

Richard Murphy, August 10, 2026 [Funding the Future]

 

Why tax?

Richard Murphy, August 13, 2026 [Funding the Future]

 

The wealthy do not flee because of tax

Richard Murphy, August 13, 2026 [Funding the Future]

 

Information age dystopia / surveillance state

Documents show how feds spied on protesters, left-wing organizations and unions during Metro Surge 

[Minnesota Reformer, via Naked Capitalism 08-14-2026]

 

A Judge Condemns Facebook for Enabling Mass Sexual Exploitation of Kids - Big tech is in a lot of trouble, as the law, the financing, and the American people turn against them

Matt Stoller, Aug 09, 2026 [BIG]

 

AI data center developers begin suing local jurisdictions behind bans and moratoriums —  claims range from officials exceeding authority to violations of due process and equal protection laws

[Tom’s Hardware, via Naked Capitalism 08-13-2026]

 

AI creates 16 new viruses that never existed in nature after learning DNA’s pattern from 9 trillion nucleotides — experts warn such applications are way ahead of necessary guardrails 

[Tom’s Hardware, via Naked Capitalism 08-09-2026]

 

Google co-founder has spent more than $100 million fighting California billionaire tax proposal

[ndtvprofit on Instagram, summarized by Drop Site Daily, August 11, 2026]

Google co-founder Sergey Brin has donated an additional $20 million to Build a Better California, bringing his total spending against the state’s proposed billionaire tax to more than $100 million, Tech Crunch reported, as he seeks to avoid an estimated $13.3 billion tax payment.

California’s Prop 40 would impose a one-time 5% tax on the net worth of roughly 200 billionaires in the state to help fund healthcare programs.

Other tech figures including Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick, and venture capitalist Peter Thiel have taken steps to avoid the assessment, though Jensen Huang, the co-founder of Nvidia, has said he would be “perfectly fine” paying the tax, which voters will decide on in November.

 

Big Tech Wants to Harvest Your Thoughts

[Wired, via Naked Capitalism 08-13-2026]

 

Private intelligence firms selling surveillance dossiers on AI, data center critics

[The American Prospect, summarized by Drop Site Daily, August 11, 2026]

Private intelligence firms including RANE Network, Kroll, and Liferaft are marketing dossiers and monitoring services on critics of artificial intelligence and data centers, framing grassroots opposition to server farms and AI expansion in counterterrorism-style language, according to documents obtained by The American Prospect.

RANE offered the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission a tailored assessment of “anti-technology sector sentiment” in March 2025 and later held a webinar warning of threats from protesters including creatives, environmentalists, laid-off workers, and civil liberties advocates.

The commercial offerings coincide with “anti-tech extremism” memos from federal agencies.

Read the full report from The American Prospect here.

 

Climate and environmental crises

London Recorded Its First Month Without Rain Since Measurements Started 150 Years Ago

[ZME Science, via Naked Capitalism 08-09-2026]

 

Hoover Dam Is Losing Power as the Colorado River Crisis Deepens

[Popular Mechanics, via Naked Capitalism 08-11-2026]

 

Rhine River Hits Record Low, Deepening Shipping Crisis 

[Bloomberg, via Naked Capitalism 08-12-2026]

 

Democrats' political malpractice

Health Insurers Are Paying Third Way as It Targets the Left

[Sludge, via Naked Capitalism 08-13-2026]

 

Leak: Top Democratic Org’s “Anti-Extremism” Project Targets Left

Ken Klippenstein , via Naked Capitalism 08-15-2026]

 

Want to win in 2026 and 2028?! Then Listen to the voters! The path to victory is right in front of us!

Dean Obeidallah, August 14, 2026

In the past when a politician like Bernie Sanders—or even Donald Trump in 2016 campaign—said “the economy is rigged” by the “billionaire class,” it was an applause line for a subset of Americans. Today that is the reality that transcends party lines and resonates across the nation.

I heard that first-hand Sunday, when I was on C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal” answering questions from viewers for about 45 minutes. What I heard from people calling on the Republican, Democratic and Independent phone lines in that time—as well as in the 30 minutes before I was on—backed up what I hear from many who call my SiriusXM show.

That is this simple truth: People are not happy. In fact, many are angry. And those feelings are born out of a deep sense of frustration. People believe the economic system is rigged against them by the rich and powerful. I even heard that in the message of Republicans who called on C-SPAN to disagree with me on specific issues but they all at some point landed on that point.

We all see the rich literally getting richer in front of us....

 

Third Way Doesn’t Care About the Democratic Party

Jason Linkins, August 15, 2026 [The New Republic]

... As Robert Reich wrote this week, “If you bother to look at the funding sources of Third Way ... you’ll find a Star Wars cantina of billionaire megadonors, Fortune 500 CEOs, corporate dark money bundlers, and giant corporations.” Third Way’s donor base is a “Trojan horse” packed to the gills with scoundrels: Wall Street cretins and private equity goons; “members of the GOP-aligned American Legislative Exchange Council,” best known for producing cookie-cutter right-wing legislation that is diametrically at odds with just about every Democratic Party policy priority; and supporters of the Republican Attorneys General Association, “which helps elect Republicans who fight federal environmental and other regulations.” In addition, Reich points out that two of the organization’s former honorary co-chairs are Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema. Enough said! (Sludge’s David Moore also reported this week that Third Way has received donations from health insurance interests that undoubtedly oppose Medicare for All, which was the centerpiece of El-Sayed’s campaign.)

 

Bidenomics Was More Successful Than People Think

[The Atlantic, via Naked Capitalism 08-13-2026]

 

Conservative / Libertarian / (anti)Republican Drive to Civil War

The Christian Nationalist Plan for America Has a Fatal Flaw

[WA Lawrence, via Naked Capitalism 08-11-2026]

 

Atheism, Nationalism, and the Conductor of the American Christianity Crazy Train

J. Basil Dannebohm [via Naked Capitalism 08-10-2026]

... Recently, a well-known Catholic journalist was cheerfully ridiculed on social media by a priest who declared with religious conviction that the journalist was, “A waste of baptismal water because he refuses to debate his liberal theological views.”

I’ve received similar messages from pastors, “influencers,” armchair theologians, and converts whose chrism has not even dried yet, all of whom suggest that my interpretation of the Gospel is “naïve,” “liberal,” “consumed with social justice,” “a victim of the heresy of empathy,” and “far too centered on the message of Christ, rather than the messages handed down by the Holy Spirit through sacred tradition.” ....

I don’t know about that Catholic journalist, but I’m not going to “debate” my “liberal theological views,” I’m going to live them.

I’ve been told I “disrupt the peace.”

That’s probably true.

I may be persona non-grata in at least two of the historical branches of Christianity, but let’s be honest: Sitting in a building for an hour on Sundays doesn’t make someone a Christian any more than sitting in a garage makes someone a Chevrolet. Judas Iscariot is proof that you can be part of a dynamic movement with an amazing shepherd and still become the devil’s stooge if your heart is not genuinely committed to the very Christ you claim to worship....

 

Conservatives meet to make birthright citizenship their long-term project

Myah Ward [Politico, via newsletter.scotusblog.com, Aug 10, 2026]

Before President Donald Trump on Thursday “unveiled two new executive orders narrowing birthright citizenship and cracking down on ‘birth tourism’ schemes,” efforts were already underway among conservatives to energize a movement against the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship ruling. “The president’s allies said they plan to make ending birthright citizenship a recurring topic at conferences and law schools where the next generation of lawyers will be trained,” according to Politico. “They turned birthright citizenship into the next Roe v. Wade, that we’re going to have to spend the next 50 years overturning,” said Mike Davis, the founder of Article III Project, a Trump-aligned legal organization, at a late-July event on the issue.

 

The Republicans Are Going to Kill People—but Not Until After They Vote

Norman J. Ornstein, August 16, 2026 [The New Republic]

In the Big Beautiful Bill, the GOP put off Medicaid cuts until after midterms. America is about to find out why.

 

The Enemy Is the Platform - How a party without an ideology found something better than one

Mike Brock, Aug 10, 2026 [Notes from the Circus]

... a man who thinks in stories is governed by whoever writes them. From 1954 to 1962 the writer was General Electric. Reagan spent eight years as host of GE Theater and as the company’s traveling ambassador, visiting all 139 GE plants under the tutelage of Lemuel Boulware, the GE vice president whose union-breaking communications strategy was so distinctive that labor law still carries the word “Boulwarism.” Thomas Evans’s The Education of Ronald Reagan documents the conversion in detail: a former union president — Reagan led the Screen Actors Guild — was systematically steeped in free-market fundamentalism, anti-communism, low taxes, and limited government, on a corporate salary, in front of corporate audiences, for nearly a decade. Reagan himself called the GE years his “postgraduate education in political science”. He was not wrong. He just never asked who designed the curriculum, or why. The Cold War made the manipulation frictionless: with actual Soviet communism supplying the contrast, everything Boulware’s people handed him — every statistic about creeping collectivism, every parable of bureaucratic strangulation — slotted cleanly into the one big story Reagan already believed, the story of free men against the machine. Business interests did not have to corrupt Reagan. They only had to cast him.

 

Trump Is a Wood-Chipper - Imagine you put your arm into a wood-chipper

Mike Brock, Aug 10, 2026 [Notes from the Circus]

The chipper does what a chipper does. It takes the arm. You stand there, blood-slick and swaying, and you say to the machine, “that was really low of you to take my arm.” Then you feed it the other one. You say, “well, that was a new low.” ....

That is what commentary about Donald Trump has become. Every week the same sentence: Trump has reached a new low. Every week the columnist stands, blood-slick, marveling at the machine.

The problem is not that the sentence is wrong. The problem is that the sentence is a category error....

Trump is a wood-chipper. This is not a metaphor about cruelty, though he is cruel. It is a claim about what kind of object he is in the sentence. Nine years of public record — the Access Hollywood tape, the family-separation policy, the mocking of a disabled reporter, the Muslim ban, the pardons, the coup attempt, the second-term deportation operations, the meme-coin grift, the pardoning of the January 6 attackers, the deployment of masked federal agents into American cities, the trade in political prosecutions, the demolition of the East Wing — do not compose a descent. They compose a specification. What the machine does when it is running is what it has always done when it is running. The pattern is not the story. The pattern is the machine....

 

The (anti)Federalist Society assault on the Constitution

Justice Samuel Alito: ‘Practical Originalism’ and Its Facile Critics 

James Taranto [The Wall Street Journal, via newsletter.scotusblog.com, Aug 10, 2026]

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Justice Samuel Alito shared that he will not leave the court this summer. “Obviously I’m here for another term,” he said. Alito reflected on the speculation surrounding his retirement decision, including calls from conservatives for him to leave the court while Republicans control the White House and Senate. “It’s not pleasant, in the sense that it’s a reminder of mortality,” he said. “It’s like, what are those vultures doing up there? They are flying around. But it goes with life tenure.” Alito also discussed critiques of his work on the court, including the claim that he is “especially vulnerable to a charge of partisanship.” “I vote in every case the way I think the case should be decided,” he said. “If that means a high correlation with what Trump wants, fine. If it means zero correlation with what Trump wants, fine as well. I think it’s wrong, it’s absolutely wrong, to say, ‘Well, you know what? I’m going to decide some cases this way and some cases the other way so that people will say, “Well, he’s objective, because sometimes he favors this side and other times he favors that side.”’”

 

How Democrats can repair the broken Supreme Court

Sen. Adam Schiff [Los Angeles Times, via newsletter.scotusblog.com, Aug 13, 2026]

In a column for the Los Angeles Times, Sen. Adam Schiff, a Democrat representing California, argued that “[f]uture Democratic majorities in Congress — perhaps starting as soon as January — should make repairing the [Supreme Court] and reforming the judicial branch a priority to make sure it does not continue to operate as a partisan and retrograde institution.” Specifically, he called on Democrats to “enact term limits for Supreme Court justices,” “expand the number of justices sitting on the court to reflect the expanded size of our nation,” and “create an enforceable code of ethics, bringing this court under the same set of rules of accountability as other leaders privileged to be in public service.” “These proposals would help restore balance and credibility to the court,” Schiff wrote.

[TW: Term limits won't really do much so long as the pipeline by which young conservatives are indoctrinated into "law and economy" and "unitary executive theory" remains open. Though I think there is a strong case to be made that such indoctrinated ideologues are far more likely to run aground on an enforceable code of ethics.]

 

Justice Samuel Alito made up to $2.9 million from fossil fuel holdings since 2005

[The Guardian, summarized by Drop Site Daily, August 12, 2026]

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito gained between $390,000 and $2.9 million from oil and gas interests between 2005 and 2024, according to an analysis by judicial watchdog Court Accountability shared exclusively with the Guardian.

Most of the gains stemmed from a Grady County, Oklahoma property in which Alito’s wife, Martha-Ann, holds a mineral interest, along with an inherited ExxonMobil stock bequest.

The findings come as the Supreme Court prepares to hear oral arguments on October 5 in a case where Suncor Energy and Exxon are seeking to block subnational governments from suing fossil fuel producers over climate effects.

    •  

Civic republicanism

Corporate Power Approaches Escape Velocity

Hamilton Nolan, Aug 14, 2026 [How Things Work]

If corporations become more powerful than national governments, we are all in trouble. The reason for this is straightforward: Corporations are not real objects. They do not exist in nature. They are legal fictions created according to a set of laws that dictate what they can and cannot do. Those laws, which quite literally create corporations, are made by governments. The rights of corporations and the limits of their operations are entirely dictated by governments, which write the laws and administer the courts that both enable corporations to exist and make money, and put boundaries on them. If governments lose their ability to draw hard lines on the behavior of corporations—if corporations become so powerful that governments are no longer able to tell them what to do—then corporations become the supreme power on earth.

This is bad, obviously, but it is worth stating why it is bad. It is bad because governments, while imperfect and sometimes even malignant in many ways, ultimately derive their legitimacy from the will of the governed. Legitimate governments, good governments, democratic governments are obligated by some scrutable process to work for the public good, as they define it. We all know the many ways that this can go awry, but when governments are bad, we can tell that they are bad because they fail on their most basic task of empowering themselves with the will of the public to increase the public good.

That’s not what corporations do at all. Corporations care not for the public good, nor for the public’s very existence. Corporations are robots, algorithms—AI programs, if you like—that work for the lone goal of increasing profits. Their definition is the same as that of cancer. They grow without regard to the good of the larger body....

 

The Mentor - How Roy Cohn taught Donald Trump everything

Kai Bird and Susan Goldmark, August 3, 2026 [The New Yorker]

 

 

Sunday, August 9, 2026

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 09, 2026

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 09, 2026

by Tony Wikrent

 

The Biggest Skygazing Day of the Century Is Almost Here [YouTube]

August 12, 2026 is the biggest skygazing day of the century. The Perseid meteor shower peaks under a completely moonless sky, the core of the Milky Way stands high in total darkness, and six planets line up across the sky before dawn.

 

War on voting

This Is What Military-Coup Preparation Looks Like.

WA Lawrence [via Naked Capitalism 08-05-2026]

The blueprint for a military coup begins when armed force enters civilian government and permanent command awaits a usable crisis.

A force approaching 5,000 armed Guard personnel, proposed permanent White House barriers, and a mission extending through 2029 are replacing temporary security measures with continuing federal authority.

“This is Liberation Day in D.C., and we’re gonna take our capital back. We’re taking it back.”

—Donald Trump, August 11, 2025 ....

 

‘Doomsday Scenario’: How Trump and Republicans Could Steal Power – Even If They Lose

Justin Glawe and Asawin Suebsaeng, Aug 03, 2026 [Zeteo]

  • Democrats may win enough seats to take back the House, but Republicans can challenge those wins and attempt to steal control of Congress.
  • The first path toward this doomsday scenario would be if Republicans replace the current House clerk. The second path is for Republicans to work in lockstep to challenge election results.

 

Sunday, August 2, 2026

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 02, 2026

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – August 02, 2026

by Tony Wikrent

 

War

The Math Behind The U.S. Defeat in Iran

Spencer Ackerman, 30 July 2026 [forever-wars.com]

... By spreading out missile and drone attacks across a wide arc of U.S.-used or aligned military bases and civilian infrastructure (energy, data and desalination facilities) spanning from Kuwait to the United Arab Emirates—and now spreading inland—Iran has forced the U.S. into firing off lots of its interceptors. It also successfully attacked on-base radars that the interceptors rely on for accuracy. While story after story reported that Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned about the limited supply of interceptors, known as magazine depth, President Trump insisted that the U.S. had sufficient capability to fend off Iranian attacks.

The actual magazine depth of the U.S. military is understandably classified. But yesterday, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a think tank with impeccable establishment credentials—Kissinger was a trustee—published an estimate of the current state of U.S. interceptor stocks. I don't know what exactly I expected, but the burn rate of the interceptors is so extreme as to make this war look doomed from the outset.

According to CSIS, the U.S. had 2330 Patriot (smaller, short-range) interceptors and 452 THAAD (larger, long-range) interceptors at the start of the war. Five months later, it has between 759 and 827 Patriot interceptors and between 234 and 278 THAADs. Those aren't figures for the interceptors the U.S. has in the Middle East. They're the figures for all the interceptors the U.S. has, period.

In other words, the U.S. has so far used up around 66 percent of its Patriot stocks and around 40 percent, conservatively, of its THAADs. It did that in five months across a war it chose. A war that Trump said would be won in four to five weeks.

The rate of expenditure hasn't been static in those five months. Remember that there was a ceasefire declared on April 8. CSIS' figures, understandably, show the most intense period of interceptor usage occurring in just the first five weeks of the war. All this helps explain why Trump had to pursue a ceasefire in the first place....

 

U.S. general warns Pentagon he lacks sufficient forces to protect Israel

Dan Lamothe, July 31, 2026 [Washington Post]
The top U.S. general in Europe privately warned the Pentagon this week that he lacks sufficient naval forces to continue protecting Israel from incoming ballistic missiles, officials said, illustrating how the ongoing Iran war has imposed constraints on the military.
 
Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, the head of U.S. European Command, sent written notification to senior Pentagon officials saying that without another Navy destroyer he will be forced to choose defense of the United States “homeland” over that of Israel, said the officials, who like some others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the correspondence.

 

Israel and US consider Iran land blockade

Connor Stringer, July 31, 2026 [The Telegraph, via yahoo.com/news]

The United States and Israel are discussing a possible land blockade of Iran, The Telegraph can reveal.

The proposal is one of several options being explored by Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu to ratchet up economic pressure on the regime after months of strikes and a prolonged campaign failed to bring it to heel....

Iran shares borders with Iraq, Turkey, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Armenia and Azerbaijan, meaning the leaders would have to persuade these countries, many of which they are not allied with, to co-operate.

Washington may view Pakistan and Iraq, which are not considered its close allies in the region, as weak links.

If any of the seven countries bordering Iran agreed to co-operate, they would face their own economic consequences and the threat of retaliatory strikes by the Islamic Republic....

 

Trump not violating any law

'He who saves his Country does not violate any Law'

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025

 

‘The Boss Wants This Money’: Inside Trump’s Unprecedented Fundraising Operation

Josh Dawsey, Dana Mattioli, Annie Linskey and Emily Glazer, July 30, 2026 [Wall Street Journal, via PoliticsNC]

Almost every night in the White House, President Trump calls his fundraiser, Meredith O’Rourke, for an update.
 
Trump asks O’Rourke which companies and donors have cut checks and which haven’t, and for how much. He often asks her to make much larger financial requests than she was planning—for some donors the ask is $5 million, for others it is $50 million. And the president gives her names to call, often including people who have recently met with him, according to people with knowledge of the calls.
 
“This is very important to the president. He’s asked me to call you and ask you for this donation,” O’Rourke has relayed on phone calls with companies, persistently following up with them. In some calls, she has referred to Trump as the boss, saying “the boss wants this money.” In turn, Trump has called her the “princess of darkness” because she is such a “killer” with donors, according to people who have heard his comments....
 
Trump stands out for taking personal control of the fundraising, and no sitting American president has ever raised these amounts for his pet projects. At the same time, companies have paid new attention to the White House as Trump has gotten involved in regulatory decisions that once were made by independent agencies, dramatically shifting the balance of power across Washington.
 
Trump has been demanding large checks from companies for a range of political and legacy projects—telling executives and lobbyists that their companies should give $25 million or $50 million. He has sometimes offered donors special access....
“Trump is shattering all fundraising paradigms in regards to hitting up corporate America for donations. The scope is mind-bogglingly large,” said Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian at Rice University. “We used to talk about the Lincoln bedroom being for sale, but this is just a wholesale money trough that’s totally different.” Critics alleged in the 1990s that the Clinton administration allowed overnight stays in the White House’s Lincoln bedroom in exchange for campaign contributions....
 
The White House referred requests for comment to Alvarez. She said the president is the “most successful fundraiser in modern political history” and that Trump plans to use the money to “help Republicans win big in the midterms, build an enduring political infrastructure and continue advancing innovative private-sector initiatives.”
 
“One thing has never changed. President Trump can’t be bought,” she said....
 
Several CEOs and board members said they believe there is a link between their contributions and their access to the president. One chairman of a publicly traded company said that if you give the money, you know you are either checked on a list, or crossed off a list if you don’t....

Companies have traded notes about what Wall Street analyst Blair Levin calls “The Trump Transaction Tax,” or a payment outside of the cost of normal business. “Another way of saying it,” Levin said, “is simply that we’re replacing the free market with the market for Trump’s affections.” ....

 

A Ruling Party That Faces No Consequences for Open Corruption Has No Reason to Accept Elections - We won't survive if we try to play by their rules.

Christopher Armitage, Aug 01, 2026 [The Existentialist Republic]

 

Trump’s Constitutional Dictatorship

Mark Danner [The New York Review, August 20, 2026 issue]

Reviewed:

... The scene is irresistible: the president of the United States sitting at the Resolute Desk and comparing himself blithely to Mao, Hitler, and Stalin. Still, what does it tell us? That a tireless and amoral will to power is deeply embedded in Donald Trump’s narcissism and vanity is not exactly a revelation: anyone who has watched him perform a ninety-minute stand-up routine before a crowd of supporters—drinking in, with almost erotic delight, the fervent worship of thousands—cannot have failed to notice. And after the undermining of NATO, the destruction of USAID, and the calamity of the Iran war, Trump’s name is more likely to appear on lists of leaders who have diminished their country’s power than lists of those who have increased it. But that he has become one of the most powerful American presidents—that he has since his second inauguration “put on a demonstration of raw executive power the country had not seen since the presidency of FDR”—is well-nigh indisputable. One could go further and say that not only has Trump, like Roosevelt and Lincoln, successfully imposed on the world’s first modern democracy a “constitutional dictatorship,”  he is the only president to have done so in the absence of a true emergency.

How did he do it? Aggressively, brutally, relentlessly—weren’t we all watching him? The more specific answer is that he did it by exploiting the chief executive’s myriad emergency powers or, as Haberman and Swan rather politely phrase it, by “redefin[ing] the very concept of an ‘emergency.’” Another way to put it is that Trump did what Trump does as easily as he breathes: he lied. Is the trade deficit, in uninterrupted existence for half a century, an emergency? Can a country leading the world in energy production be said to be undergoing an “energy emergency”? Can we consider that the southern border, where crossings dropped 77 percent after Joe Biden’s executive order limiting entry, remains in the grip of a “border emergency”? The answer is no. But it doesn’t matter. In issuing more than 140 executive orders in his first hundred days in office—Roosevelt issued ninety-nine—Trump declared that the country was beset by no fewer than ten separate emergencies.

 And in the face of this supposedly unprecedented onslaught the president must have unprecedented powers to confront them....

 

Trump’s National Killer Police Force

[The Intercept, July 24, 2026]

Within the span of a week, federal immigration agents shot and killed two people in Maine and Texas, and another was hit by a truck and killed in Florida after trying to avoid ICE agents. A fourth person recently died in ICE custody after reportedly being denied medication.

Their deaths prompted yet another round of questioning as to how federal immigration agents have amassed so much power and so little accountability. This week on The Intercept Briefing, host Akela Lacy speaks with Naureen Shah, of the American Civil Liberties Union, and Nayna Gupta, of the American Immigration Council, on the consequences of allowing the government to build a national policing force that’s bringing Trump’s war on immigrants into communities across the country.

“The $240 billion injection that the Trump administration has given ICE and Border Patrol make these agencies — which already were the largest federal law enforcement agencies — make them far larger than anything that we’ve seen at the federal law enforcement level,” says Shah. “Their budgets are bigger than that of many, actually most militaries around the world.” ....

 

Sunday, July 26, 2026

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – July 26, 2026

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – July 26, 2026

by Tony Wikrent

 

Prosecutor Investigating U.S. Boat Strikes and Claims of Torture Was Murdered in Ecuador 

Camila Lourdes Galarza, July 23, 2026 [Drop Site]

QUITO, Ecuador—Alexandra Bravo, the prosecutor assigned to investigate U.S. strikes on three Ecuadorian boats and the 36 survivors’ subsequent accounts of torture and kidnapping, was shot dead in the coastal city of Manta last month. According to police, on June 14 a hitman aboard a black motorcycle opened fire on Bravo as she and her sister were leaving a café at about 11 a.m. Bravo’s sister, who jumped to protect her, was also killed in the attack.

 

Are Foreign Intelligence Agencies and Criminals Killing Donald Trump’s Enemies to Earn His Favor. The Quiet Dismantling of America's Defenses Against Foreign Assassination on U.S. Soil.

Christopher Armitage, July 25, 2026 [The Existentialist Republic]

 

War on Voting

Don’t Let ICE Freeze Voting

Guest article by Jay Inslee, former governor of Washington State [MeidasTouch Network, Feb 03, 2026]

... Ask yourself this - why would Trump NOT surround polling places with camo-clad, face-masked, helmet-wearing, semi-automatic long gun carrying ICE and Border Patrol agents on election day, in every Democratic-leaning precinct in any targeted district? What would restrain him? His well-developed sense of propriety? His internal moral code? The spineless Republicans in the House and Senate that would have to threaten him with impeachment if he did this? Good luck finding those Profiles in Courage.

This would be devastating. He would not target all the precincts, just those with heavy Democratic performance. Given the fact that the Trump administration shoots protesters and then lies about them, the abject fear these troops would put in the minds of thousands of people who just want to vote cannot be measured, but is surely significant, particularly given the close margins in the House....

 

THE PLOT AGAINST THE MIDTERMS

Seymour Hersh [via Naked Capitalism 07-24-2026]

 

Donald Trump Doesn't Want Nursing Home Residents To Vote

Brian Beutler, July 22, 2026 [Off Message]

On Monday, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services quietly rescinded standing guidance—first issued in October 2020, then renewed ahead of the 2024 election—reminding nursing-home owners that their residents have the right to vote “without interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal” from their long-term care facilities, and that they “are required to support residents in the exercise of their right to vote, such as assisting with absentee or mail-in voting or transporting residents to polling locations or ballot drop-boxes in a safe manner.”

 

War

New WSJ Article Paints Trump in ‘Downfall Video’ Type Scenes in the Oval

Josh Marshall, July 24, 2026 [Talking Points Memo]

The Journal has an article today about the increasing unreality of the strategy, if one can call it that, the U.S. is using to approach Trump’s war with Iran. The headline tells the story: Trump is Losing Patience Over an Iran War with No Clear End in Sight. The article appears to be based on accounts from various advisors who’ve been present at planning meetings with Trump. It’s filled with quotes about how he’s out of patience, mad, fed up, has lost confidence in diplomacy, etc. One advisors says he’s moved into “revenge mode.” He’s telling advisors he thinks he can “break the Iranians’ will through an aggressive bombing campaign.”

 

Trump threatens to bomb a civilian target for every attack on shipping in Hormuz

[Drop Site Daily, July 22, 2026]

President Donald Trump said the U.S. would bomb one Iranian bridge or power plant for every attack by Iran on a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, warning that the policy would apply to strikes carried out with “missiles, rockets, drones, or any other device or weapon.” In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the targets could include infrastructure “located next to, or in, the capital city of Tehran.”

 

'Open the Gates of Hell' - The child could stand down. Or not. Let's look at the 'not'

Thomas Neuburger, July 24, 2026 [God's Spies]

... If Trump decides to launch a major strike, a rage of revenge or even a landing of troops, there aren’t many pathways ahead. Either:

  • The U.S. security state, in its wisdom, will raise its head above water and get in his way; or
  • All hell will break loose.

If Trump really makes up his mind, those are the roads.

If the State Were to Try to Stop Trump…

Let’s look at the first — the State attempts to stop Trump. I wrote about that earlier. I think this is the least likely path, but if it occurs, here are all the State’s choices....

 

US Intelligence Assessment Says the US Cannot Bomb Iran Into Capitulation

Dave DeCamp, July 21, 2026 [defenddemocracy.press, July 25, 2026]

The Washington Post reported on Monday night that a new US intelligence assessment says that Iran’s government is unlikely to feel a significant impact or change its negotiating position as a result of the US airstrikes that have been hitting Iran.

The report, which cited current and former US officials, said that US intelligence agencies have also “concluded that Tehran and Washington are, for now, stuck in an indefinite limbo between peace and war,” though there’s been little peace lately as the US has bombed Iran for 10 consecutive nights.

 

WSJ: Iran rebuilding faster than Israeli intelligence expected

[Wall Street Journal, via [Drop Site Daily, July 24, 2026]

Iran has quickly rebuilt infrastructure damaged during months of U.S. and Israeli bombing, from missile bases deep inside mountains to bridges, ports, and production facilities, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

    • Planet Labs and Airbus imagery showed repairs at missile bases near Kangavar, north of Kermanshah, and at Dezful, where crews reopened collapsed tunnel entrances and repaved access roads within weeks.
    • One Israeli military official said Iran repaired a bridge hit by three Israeli bombs within days. Officials also said that some strikes only collapsed entrances to deeply buried facilities, leaving the missiles inside intact.

 

How Biden Enabled Israel’s Aggression Toward Gaza—and Iran - Top officials from the previous Administration now express regret over their failure to rein in Netanyahu.

David D. Kirkpatrick,  July 20, 2026 [The New Yorker]

On March 5, 2024, five months into the war in Gaza, Mirjana Spoljaric, the president of the International Committee of the Red Cross, sent a confidential letter to President Joe Biden. Under the Geneva Conventions, the Red Cross holds a unique responsibility to counsel states about avoiding war crimes. In the letter, which I obtained from a former United States official, Spoljaric reminded Biden that the organization had condemned the “horrific” October 7th massacre of Israelis by Hamas, and remained “relentless” in pressing the group to release the hostages it had taken. But she was now appealing to Biden “with profound alarm” because Israel, which had been pummelling Gaza with heavy munitions since October, was ignoring the Red Cross as never before. “The way the hostilities are being conducted by Israel is incompatible” with the laws of armed conflict, she wrote, “particularly the obligations to protect civilians and distinguish between military targets and civilians or civilian infrastructure, to ensure dignified treatment of detainees and the dead, to protect medical installations and personnel, and to provide and enable access of humanitarian aid.” ....

... Iran had been central to Biden’s thinking about the Middle East, several top advisers said. He’d feared that any public pressure the U.S. put on Israel—any “daylight” between the allies—could invite attacks by Iran or its Lebanese client, Hezbollah. The U.S. would then be compelled to defend Israel in a regional conflagration. Brett McGurk, Biden’s White House coördinator for the Middle East and probably his most influential adviser, championed this position, arguing that rock-solid support for Israel would help contain Iran, whose proxies killed three U.S. soldiers in the region during the first months of the Gaza conflict....

... alarms about potential war crimes began ringing inside the Biden Administration soon after Israel began its counterattack on Gaza. By November 1, 2023, the Palestinian death toll was at least eighty-eight hundred, including more than fifty-eight hundred women and children. Israeli jets were conducting as many as eight hundred strikes a day on northern Gaza, and Administration officials who were closely tracking the war told me that Israeli military planners could not possibly have preselected or so quickly identified that many legitimate military targets, such as tunnel entrances, rocket launchers, and Hamas leaders. Nor could the Israelis have carefully weighed whether the risk to civilian lives and infrastructure was proportionate to the military value of each target. Startlingly, the strikes appeared to move in a geographical line from the northeast to the southwest, flattening whole neighborhoods in a way that suggested little differentiation between civilian and military structures. Biden’s Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, anxiously asked his staff how Israel could justify this scale of destruction. A senior State Department official told me, “We were all shocked at how aggressive and deadly it was, and asking, ‘What the fuck are they doing?’ " ....

Blinken flew to Israel a few days later. He met with Netanyahu and Gallant, and, according to people present, told them that letting in food was not only “a moral responsibility” but also “a strategic imperative and a legal imperative.” Yet Netanyahu wouldn’t budge until Blinken threatened to cancel a planned visit by Biden. Even then, Netanyahu agreed to let in only a small amount of supplies, which would have to come through Rafah, on Gaza’s border with Egypt; he also asked that this minor concession remain secret. He feared a domestic backlash for not starving Gaza’s women, children, and other civilians. Biden made his visit, and as he left Netanyahu bragged publicly that he’d defied the President. He declared that Israel “will not allow humanitarian assistance” from “our territory into the Gaza Strip.” ....

On May 5th, Israeli officials, in an apparent attempt to stir up American supporters on the eve of the report’s release to Congress, told Axios that the Biden Administration had quietly put a hold on a shipment of what the publication called “ammunition.” The withheld ammunition turned out to be thousands of enormous bombs: about half weighed two thousand pounds, the others five hundred pounds. (A two-thousand-pound bomb kills anyone within a radius of twelve hundred feet.) In an interview on CNN three days later, Biden said, of the two-thousand-pound munitions, “Civilians have been killed in Gaza as a consequence of those bombs.” If Israel attacked Rafah’s “population centers,” he continued, he would not be “supplying the weapons.” Israeli officials said that their military used the two-thousand-pound bombs to destroy fortified tunnels, and although there are less indiscriminate ways to accomplish that objective, Republicans pounced. Senator Tom Cotton, of Arkansas, declared that Biden’s “position is de facto for Hamas victory.” Representative Keith Self, of Texas, called Biden “Benedict Arnold.” Sixteen House Democrats joined Republicans in condemning the decision to withhold the large bombs....

 

And It Goes On - We don't get to say when it stops

Aurelien, July 22, 2026 [Trying to Understand the World, via Naked Capitalism 07-23-2026]

Given that about ninety per cent of all those who have ever written about international relations, war and conflict studies and military-strategic issues are alive and writing now, you might be surprised to learn that we still know very little about the principal causes of real-world conflicts, and even less than that about why and how they end. Moreover, we lack even an agreed definition of what a “conflict” is, which means that various attempts to calculate the frequency and length of conflicts, as well as to identify their end, give wildly different results....

There is probably no major conflict in modern history where experts completely agree on the “causes.” In turn, this is because the very structure and definition of such conflicts is often contested. If you believe that there is an organic and causal relationship between the Second Word War in Asia and that in Europe, then you will argue that the War started in the early 1930s, and look for causal connections between the two episodes. If (like me) you regard these as two separate wars with some thematic connections and a degree of influence on each other, then you will prefer different dates, different end-points and different emphases in accounts of the period. Even in the more geographically constricted First World War, there are huge differences in emphasis, and a debate that can never be settled about the ‘“causes,” both immediate and long-term. The causal chain between the assassination of an Austrian Archduke by Serb nationalists in Sarajevo, and fighting between British and German colonial troops in what was then Tanganyika, has about the strength of a cotton thread, and it is questionable in the end if we are even talking about the same conflict.

Likewise, it’s not always obvious when wars “end.” (The fighting did not stop everywhere in November 1918 for example.) How many wars have there been in the Middle East since 1948? Some would argue only one, with long pauses and changes of battlefront. Did any of these wars actually “end?” Was the Lebanese Civil War a separate event whose causes were primarily domestic, even if outside powers like Syria intervened from the start? Was it one war or several, with pauses and reconfigurations? Did that War actually end in 1990, or did exhaustion just produce a long pause where war does not seem attractive? And if there is, in fact, an underlying and insoluble crisis which occasionally takes the form of conflict, should we not be giving more of our attention to the crisis in question, and less to the periodic conflicts? ....

This in turn is an aspect of a larger problem, which is the historical tendency to view the West as the norm. If the Russians and the Iranians are doing something different from us, they must be wrong. If we are, by definition, doing the right thing, then we should win, and so we do not need to change anything substantial... This is itself part of a massive over-estimate of western norms and western power in the world, which has survived decades of disappointment, and is still very powerful, largely because we know little about strategic issues and concerns outside the West, and cannot be bothered to find out. We make assumptions about western power and influence which are normatively rather than pragmatically based. We assume that people who sound as though they might think like us actually do think like us, because our way of thinking is just superior. We assume that western doctrine, training and equipment is the best, because we have never seriously researched others, and we look for someone to blame when any of these are shown to be inadequate....

More generally, trying to actually get to grips with the fiendish complexity of, say, Middle East or West African politics is a life’s work for specialists, and western capitals are in general simply not interested in that level of detail. For generations now, it has been easier to invoke Great Power arguments than to attend to actual circumstances on the ground, and nothing much changes. From the 1970s, western powers claimed that independence movements in Africa, because they had looked to the Soviet Union for support, were therefore nothing but tools of Moscow. (As late as 1990, the BBC was furiously criticised by some right-wing politicians for its live coverage of the release of the “terrorist” Mandela.) And “interference” by the Soviet Union was seen everywhere: right-wing journalists, prompted by unidentified “intelligence sources” claimed in the 1970s that De Gaulle’s decision to withdraw French forces from the NATO Integrated Military Structure had been masterminded by the KGB. Political folklore being as unimaginative and unoriginal it is, fundamentally the same kinds of ideas circulate today, enabling politicians and pundits to avoid the complexities of real life, and to luxuriate in the idea of a mysterious and glamorous world of “psyops” and “colour revolutions” and “cut-outs” which they know, in reality, almost nothing about. And if we get it wrong, well the consequences don’t affect us....

The panic arises from the dawning understanding that western actions can have real consequences. For several decades, talking and acting tough against China, Russia or Iran has been essentially playing to a domestic audience, seeking to appear more radical and hard-line than the next actor. What the targets of this behaviour may themselves have thought was irrelevant, and anyway there was nothing they could do about it. That’s changed now, of course, but habits of generations die hard. It’s not that western governments are trying to “provoke a war” with China, it’s that they can’t abandon the habit of threatening and insulting that country, secure in the belief that there will never be any practical consequences. Until now, though, the subtlety with which the Chinese are conducting themselves is obviously more than western political systems can easily understand.

It follows that the West has now largely lost the ability to determine how crises will unfold, and especially when and how they will finish....

And the dreaded Military-Industrial Complex: won’t they force the war to continue? Maybe not so dreaded: of the largest US companies listed by revenue in Fortune magazine, none of the military companies are in the top fifty. Much economic power lies elsewhere, and anyway you can’t escalate with things you haven’t got....

 

Trump not violating any law

'He who saves his Country does not violate any Law'

Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025

 

Truth Social to sell trading firms ‘fastest’ access to Trump’s posts.

[Reuters, via The Big Picture, July 19, 2026]

Trump Media & Technology Group has unveiled a paid-for, licensed data feed that will give banks and trading firms “the fastest” access ‌to posts from influential Truth Social accounts, such as President Donald Trump’s, whose posts often move global markets. The product, called “Truth API,” will deliver posts from the 10 most influential accounts to customers at a significantly faster pace than a regular push notification on the Truth Social platform, a spokesperson said.

 

 FCC Officials Took Pricey Gifts From Paramount as the Company Needed Approval for Billion-Dollar Deals

[ProPublica)

ProPublica documents the gifts — Kennedy Center galas, fancy dinners — that Paramount lavished on FCC officials while seeking regulatory approval. The appearance of corruption is indistinguishable from the thing itself.

 

Letters from an American, July 24, 2026
Heather Cox Richardson, July 25, 2026

Tony Romm and Brad Plumer of the New York Times reported this afternoon that the Trump administration’s claim last October that it was cutting programs in order to protect taxpayers against waste was, in fact, a lie. In court filings, federal officials admitted that the $7.5 billion in cuts from clean energy projects begun under former president Joe Biden were “based solely” on whether states had voted for Democratic candidate Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election.

Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought announced the cuts by saying, “Nearly $8 billion in Green New Scam funding to fuel the Left’s climate agenda is being cancelled.” But, in fact, a government lawyer told the court that none of the cancellations were “based on any programmatic, statutory, cost-reduction or performance-based factor.”

 

Trump administration freezes over $1B in Medicaid funds to California, Minnesota

[Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, via Drop Site Daily, July 22, 2026]

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) said Tuesday it is deferring about $867.5 million in Medicaid payments to California and $199 million to Minnesota, Axios reported.

CMS claims that its financial reviews revealed “unsupported claims” for in-home care and other services in the states. Minnesota state officials called the change “unprecedented and punitive,” noting their full collaboration with CMS’ inquiry.

CMS announced in May that it would defer $1.3 billion in Medicaid funds to California, in what CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz claimed was the agency’s biggest ever deferral.

 

After "Political Terrorism" Summit, U.S. Names 43 Americans + Groups

Ken Klippenstein, July 20, 2026

Rubio report on Cuban subversion names Zohran Mamdani, Amy Goodman, Hasan Piker + orgs like DSA and Amazon Labor Union

 

Trump’s Phantom Enemies - The Trump administration is laying the groundwork for blacklisting and criminalizing all left-wing, progressive, anti-war and anti-imperialist dissent.

Chris Hedges, July 22, 2026

 

Trump’s Consumer Watchdog Pick Worked For Companies Sued By The Agency

Luke Goldstein, July 22, 2026 [The Lever]

President Donald Trump’s pick to take over the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Brian Johnson, previously consulted for a litany of companies and industry groups sued for alleged consumer protection violations, including by the financial regulatory agency he’s now poised to lead, according to financial disclosures reviewed by The Lever.

Among Johnson’s clients were payday lenders charging up to 360 percent interest rates, credit reporting agencies that distributed inaccurate information about consumers’ financial status, and a home equity company sued for allegedly trapping homeowners in debt with false promises....

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) began operations 15 years ago this week, in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, with a mandate to protect the public from the kinds of rogue practices that Johnson’s clients have been accused of deploying.

Johnson, a longtime critic of the agency, worked as a deputy director at the Bureau under the first Trump administration, where he was once described as the “Wizard of Oz… pulling the levers behind the curtain.” Most notably, Johnson authored a “five-year strategic” plan to pare back the agency’s scrutiny of corporations, which was met with fawning praise from the financial industry.

Johnson most recently served as a Vice President at the national bank Capital One, a position he held in 2025 when Trump’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau abruptly dropped a major lawsuit brought by the Biden administration against the bank....

 

The Alien Terrorist Removal Court

Steve Vladeck [via Naked Capitalism 07-21-2026]

 

DOJ withdraws subpoenas against NYT journalists

[New York Times, via [Drop Site Daily, July 24, 2026]

The Justice Department withdrew subpoenas seeking phone records and grand jury testimony from New York Times journalists after Judge Arun Subramanian pressed prosecutors for nearly an hour over procedural violations.

The DOJ had attempted to subpoena journalists investigating the security capabilities of Trump’s new Air Force One, donated to him by Qatar, an act the Times claimed was an attempt to intimidate its reporters. The Justice Department says that the investigation “remains ongoing.”

 

Tariffs, Yet Again

Barry Ritholtz, July 24, 2026 [The Big Picture]

These are as likely unlawful as the IEEPA tariffs were, but for different and more technical reasons. Congress did give the Executive branch limited authority to impose these sorts of tariffs, but with a very specific set of guidelines and procedures to follow.

The documents filed claim these were followed properly, but their own language makes it clear this is unlikely.

The new strategy is to use the complexity of Section 301 to provide SCOTUS cover to allow what is plainly a usurpation of Congressional authority.1   It was impossible for any credible court to have supported the IEEPA tariffs, as they were so clearly unconstitutional.

 

8 things you need to know (and didn’t read) about Trump’s new tariffs

Dan Froomkin, July 24, 2026 [presswatchers.org]

 

Trump Jr.’s investment firm posts 200% returns

[Drop Site Daily, July 23, 2026]

Donald Trump Jr.’s investment firm 1789 Capital has generated returns of roughly 200% as of June 30, far outpacing the venture capital industry average of around 21%, the Times reported on Wednesday.

    • 1789 Capital has grown from a fund managing a few hundred million dollars to one managing more than $3 billion in assets by investing in companies benefiting from Trump administration policies, The New York Times reported.
    • The firm’s investments include rare-earths producer Vulcan Elements, which received a $620 million Defense Department loan months after 1789 invested and is now under congressional Democratic scrutiny, and Polymarket, now valued at $15 billion after federal regulators granted it a U.S. operating license.

 

Strategic Political Economy

Oh Dear, Condo Prices Fell by 15% to 33% in 30 Bigger Cities Already. Some Dropped Back to 2006 Levels

Wolf Richter [via Naked Capitalism 07-21-2026]

 

Global power shift

China is now world’s No 1 science power, top Russian scientist Artem Oganov says

[South China Morning Post, July 19, 2026]

 

Iranian Missile Accuracy's Crucial Chinese Component (Allegedly) - A Chinese alternative to GPS may be crucial to draining the U.S. interceptor magazine

Spencer Ackerman, 20 July 2026 [FOREVER WARS and The Intercept]

 

Oligarchy

How America's Corporate Class Became Legally Unaccountable (w/ Marie Gottschalk) (video)

Chris Hedges, July 23, 2026

 

The Musk Machine Comes For The Midterms - The law firms that helped Elon Musk gut Delaware’s shareholder protections are now spending big to save the Democratic lawmakers who made it possible.

Luke Goldstein, July 14, 2026 [The Lever]

 

Felonomics

The CDC Has a Cyclospora Lab. DOGE Downsized It Last Year

[Wired, via The Big Picture, July 19, 2026]

Former CDC staffers on the cuts now haunting the outbreak response: “Based on simple math, these outbreak responses—which require rapid, timely responses—are going to be greatly diminished,” the former CDC lab director tells WIRED.

 

Trump gave us the worst diarrhea outbreak in decades yet corporate media yawns!

Dean Obeidallah, July 21, 2026

 

SNAP Tracker: People Are Losing Food Assistance as the Harmful 2025 Republican Reconciliation Law Is Implemented 

[Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, via Naked Capitalism 07-24-2026]

 

The Kleptocrat Nesting Dolls Behind Trump’s Potemkin Gas Stations

Maureen Tkacik, July 20, 2026 [The American Prospect]

... Upon subpoenaing the gas station chain CEO’s bank records, PMG ultimately discovered he had no fewer than 28 other credit agreements he hadn’t disclosed on behalf of three or four alter-ego companies whose businesses he’d never listed on his application. The CEO and his brother/partner—two central New Jersey men in their thirties named Syed and Shamikh Kazmi, respectively—had outstanding default judgments against them in Wisconsin and Michigan, a business in Florida they had never disclosed, and legal disputes with landlords and franchisors from Circle K to Phillips 66 to 7-Eleven, the latter of which accused the brothers in a lawsuit of allowing a store they were operating to fall into such an alarming state of squalor it was forced to “disown” it, then exploiting a provision in the franchise agreement to order hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of cigarettes in its last weeks of operation that they allegedly neither returned to corporate nor paid for. Another landlord was suing them for tens of thousands of dollars in unpaid rent. The lawsuits would drag on and multiply while the Kazmi brothers bid on new assets under slightly altered names, then failed over and over again to wire over the required deposits....

 

Gas Grab - Big Oil is laying off workers while ramping up production — and profits.

Veronica Riccobene, Jonathan Easley, July 17, 2026  [The Lever]

Gusher. The Trump administration’s escalation of the war with Iran once again has Americans paying more at the pump, leading to a massive windfall for oil companies — even as the industry slashes jobs and reaps the benefits of reduced wartime regulations. After briefly dropping in June, the price of a gallon of gas hit $4 this week, up from $3.14 one year ago, as affordability becomes a major issue in the 2026 midterm elections. The world’s top 100 oil and gas companies reportedly raked in more than $30 million in excess profits every hour when gas prices spiked at the start of the war. And in the coming weeks, U.S.-based oil firms are expected to report their best quarterly profits in years.

📉 Still, despite increased production, employment in the oil and gas industry has fallen sharply, with Chevron, ExxonMobil, BP, ConocoPhillips, and Imperial Oil collectively shedding tens of thousands of jobs. In 2016, U.S. oil and gas extraction jobs employed 187,300 people. By June of 2026, that number had fallen to 114,500.

 

Trump calls for review after climate manual for judges withdrawn

Zach Schonfeld [The Hill, via scotusblog.com, July 21, 2026]

In a Truth Social post on Sunday, President Donald Trump demanded review “of an updated judges’ manual that he claims the left improperly influenced,” according to The Hill. “These Manuals have been totally DISCREDITED,” Trump wrote. “Our Nation’s Federal Judges deserve Facts and Science, not Political Fraud and False Science on Climate.” The president’s comments come after “a controversial climate science chapter” was removed from “the updated ‘Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence,’ which federal judges use to aid them in cases involving complex scientific topics,” and after Justice Elena Kagan, who wrote the foreword for the manual, was asked about that chapter’s removal during her congressional testimony last week. Kagan said “she hadn’t read the chapter ... and insisted the judge who managed the project is working to avoid a repeat.” “I know that she is engaged with members of Congress about ... how to make sure that the processes that the Federal Judicial Center uses [to produce the manual] are good ones and that a situation like this does not come up again,” Kagan said.

 

Ex-DOGE staffers launch military AI cyber startup valued at $1.4 billion

[Reuters, via Drop Site Daily, July 23, 2026]

Former Department of Government Efficiency employees—including Gavin Kliger, until recently the Pentagon’s chief data officer—have launched Cathedral, a startup seeking government contracts for AI-driven military cyber operations against adversaries like China, after closing a $160 million funding round led by Andreessen Horowitz and Sequoia Capital, Reuters reported Wednesday.

 

The carnage of mainstream neoliberal economics

Investor alert: Rare earth mining isn’t paying off 

Kevin Walmsley [via Naked Capitalism 07-25-2026]

China's export bans on gallium and other key materials have demolished supply chains for arms suppliers.

Now the War on Iran is liquidating arsenals far faster than the munitions can be replaced, and policymakers have pledged billions of dollars to build out new sources of supply....

The Pentagon is in desperate need of more gallium to build missiles and radars, gallium is a by-product of the aluminum mining and refining industry, China has cut off exports of gallium from its aluminum companies....

The gallium shortage is an urgent problem for Western militaries, because gallium is so critical in radar systems, communications, and electronic warfare platforms. Policymakers in the United States are suddenly aware of the problem, now that the Pentagon is blowing through their arsenal of weapons far faster than they can be replaced, and without gallium they cannot be replaced anyway....

[TW: Back in the 1980s, I was covering the quiet but very portentous conflict in the Reagan regime, as the military industrial complex joined with the old hands in State and Commerce Departments to warn that the Reagan ideologues' obsession with free market and free trade nostrums were endangering USA's military-industrial base. I was particularly clued in to the MIC freak out engendered by the sudden collapse of the USA machine tool industry. The Reagan ideologues quickly came to hate the Office of Technology Assessment in particular. (Anti)Republicans took a perverse joy in Newt Gingrich stripping OTA of ALL funding in 1995. Any points for saying "I told you so," when I told you so was forty years ago?]

 

‘Starvation Wages’ at Giant US Corporations Force Workers to Seek Taxpayer-Funded Aid

Julia Conley, July 23, 2026 [CommonDreams]

US Sen. Bernie Sanders recently commissioned a government analysis of federal aid programs and how much employees of some of the largest and most politically influential corporations in the country are relying on food and healthcare benefits due to the chronically low wages paid by Amazon, Walmart, and other firms.

On Wednesday, the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) released the results of its research....

Six years after the GAO first analyzed low-wage workers’ use of Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the report found that the number of Amazon employees who required federal assistance has nearly tripled since 2020, despite the fact that the e-commerce giant has increased its annual profits from $11.59 billion to $77.67 billion in that time....

Sanders noted that Walmart increased its annual profits from $14.88 billion in 2020 to $21.89 billion in 2025, but the number of workers who relied on Medicaid grew by 55% to more than 16,000 people in the 11 states sampled by the GAO....

 

New Fed research suggests far fewer Americans own homes than widely believed 

[CBS, via Naked Capitalism 07-25-2026]

Only about 53% of U.S. adults own homes, far below the commonly cited 65% homeownership rate, according to new Federal Reserve research that paints a starker picture of access to homeownership.

 

Big Food Is Running Out of Moves With Shoppers and Investors

[Wall Street Journal, via The Big Picture, July 21, 2026]

Shrinkflation exhausted. Price hikes maxed out. Volume declining. The major food companies have no good options left. Investors are rightly giving up on companies like General Mills and Kraft Heinz, which are squeezed by everything from inflation to GLP-1s.

 

On Quality: An ode to Pirsig: What quality is and how it is degraded.

[Worse On Purpose, via The Big Picture, July 25, 2026]

Every investigation I’ve published documents the same story: a product stripped of what made it good while everything a shopper can check stayed intact. Same logo, same spec sheet, same four and a half stars, same price or higher. What got swapped out, the steel gauge, the stitch count and the years of service life, sits in the parts you can’t check from the aisle. That gap between what you can verify and what actually matters is the whole game, for them and for you. They use it to slowly diminish the quality of the products you once loved without tripping an alarm. You can use it to watch the theft happen.

 

Predatory finance

Private equity’s influence in U.S. manufacturing

[Private Equity Stakeholder Project, via Naked Capitalism 07-23-2026]

 

Apple's robo-repo (25 Jul 2026)

Cory Doctorow,  July 25, 2026 [Pluralistic]

[TW: Before getting to Apple, this article is stuffed with the rip-off details on Klarna, the subprime crisis of 2007-2010 and how Obama and Geithner saved the banksters by sacrificing home-owners (the economic point where a reactionary populist revolt against elites was made inevitable), contract lending to "long-haul truckers, among the most exploited workforce in America," subprime auto-loans....]

... The next wave of automotive usury-tech was a kind of systematic exploration of the entire space between a car that is repossessed and a car that isn't. Some subprime cars are fitted with an extra stereo system that can only be controlled by the borrower over a wireless connection. Miss a payment and this secondary stereo turns itself on and starts playing earsplitting threats about what will happen to you if you don't pay up. The only way to turn it off is to make the payment. The next step is remote immobilization: miss too many payments (or violate a lease clause by crossing the county line) and your car just stops working:

https://archive.nytimes.com/dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/09/24/miss-a-payment-good-luck-moving-that-car/

But the apex of this usury-tech comes from (where else?) Tesla. Miss a Tesla payment and your car can do way more than just immobilize itself and tell the dealer where to get the car – it also unlock its doors, flash its lights, honk its horn, and back out of its parking space when the repo man arrives:

https://tiremeetsroad.com/2021/03/18/tesla-allegedly-remotely-unlocks-model-3-owners-car-uses-smart-summon-to-help-repo-agent/ ....

That's where the law comes in. In 1998, Bill Clinton signed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Section 1201 of the DMCA makes it a felony to produce a tool that bypasses an "access control." That means that if a computer is designed to block you from modifying it, removing that block is a felony, punishable by five years in prison and a $500k fine. DMCA 1201 doesn't distinguish between modifications undertaken for a lawful purpose (changing your printer so it works with generic ink) and unlawful purpose (breaking the locks on a DVD so you can sell infringing copies). DMCA 1201 criminalizes anything the manufacturer dislikes. It's what Jay Freeman calls "felony contempt of business model.

 

They’re not capitalists — they’re predatory criminals

A Network Unravelling - Disclosures, Defiance, and the Ongoing Fight for Epstein Transparency

Nolan Higdon, July 21, 2026 [Savage Minds, via Naked Capitalism 07-24-2026]

 

How America’s Corporate Class Became Legally Unaccountable (w/ Marie Gottschalk)

The Chris Hedges Report

 

Restoring balance to the economy

Senate Democrat proposes universal health care for children

Joseph Choi, 07/21/26 [The Hill]

Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) on Tuesday unveiled a proposal for all American children to receive Medicaid, a program he’s dubbed MediKids, saying Democrats must bring new ideas to move the conversation on healthcare forward.

Kim’s MediKids Act would automatically enroll every child into the program at birth, provide continued eligibility until the age of 26 and cover 100 percent of the federal medical assistance percentage for this cohort....

Democratic Sens. Alex Padilla (Calif.), Cory Booker (N.J.) and Tammy Duckworth (Ill.) are co-sponsors of the bill. Kim says conversations with Republicans are just now starting.

In recent years, childhood uninsurance rates have risen, going from 5.1 percent to 6 percent between 2022 and 2024, the highest it’s been in a decade....

 

Could A U.S. State Pass a 30 Hour Work Week? The Senate passed one in 1933 by 53 to 30. 

Christopher Armitage, July 24, 2026 [The Existentialist Republic]

 

Disrupting mainstream economics

Washington Still Ignores Airline Monopolies - The GAO's latest report doesn't make it past takeoff.

Economic Liberties, July 22, 2026 [The Economic Populist]

... In a recently released report on airline “competition” completed as part of the 2024 FAA Reauthorization Act, the GAO claims Americans benefit from increased “competition” and that fares inclusive of junk fees are lower than they were 19 years ago. None of this is true. The twin effects of deregulation and dramatic concentration took a wrecking ball to airline competition.

In the spirit of the mandate that ordered this report commissioned, I reviewed the report and listed the most inaccurate things about it. I should add, in the interests of full disclosure, I was interviewed extensively by GAO investigators for this report — only to see much of what I told them dismissed or disregarded....

 

Disrupting mainstream politics

Should Federalist Society Membership be an Impeachable Offense for Judges?

Christopher Armitage, July 19, 2026 [The Existentialist Republic]

A Serious Exploration of the Case for Impeaching and Removing Every Federal Judge and Supreme Court Justice Who Has Ever Been a Member of the Federalist Society or Endorsed Unitary Executive Theory.

 

A sitting judge just delivered the most scathing critique of this Supreme Court term

Mark Joseph Stern, July 19, 2026 [Slate]

... Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Justice Todd Eddins’ excoriating assessment of the term so valuable. In an opinion handed down Wednesday, the justice once again refused to import SCOTUS’s “results-driven approach to due process” into state law. He explained that the Hawaiʻi Constitution “takes no instruction” from “hubristic originalists” who are “driven by agenda and intent on swiping power that belongs to the people.” A Supreme Court “that systematically dismantles democratic safeguards, steamrolls constitutional liberties, and tramples human dignity,” he concluded, “does not chart the course for the Hawaiʻi Constitution.”

DANIEL R. GRANILLO vs. STATE OF HAWAIʻI (pdf)

[SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI]

In Citizens United v. Fed. Election Comm’n, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), the Court claimed fidelity to text, history, and
tradition while invalidating yet another democratically vetted law, handing corporations the same speech rights as flesh-and
blood Americans and letting dollars talk louder than voters....

But “the Supreme Court’s imperious ideology,” Eddins continued, “does not stop at due process. The same jurisprudence has cratered democracy itself,” a process that accelerated over the term that just ended. Its “judicial demolition” of the Voting Rights Act culminated in Louisiana v. Callais, which “buried what remained of the crown jewel of the civil rights movement. Pretend law for a real statute.” The supermajority “then ditched its own thirty-two day default for releasing decisions and hustled out its judgment mid-primary, a favor granted over objection only twice in twenty-five years.” Just weeks later, “on its shadow docket, the court tossed an eleven-day trial record built on fifty-one witnesses, 790 exhibits, 2,600 pages of testimony, and a 270-page opinion by a three-judge court.” In the process, “it resurrected a tainted congressional map the three-judge factfinders found deliberately entrenched racial bias against Black voters.”

[TW: The precise attack on SCOTUS by Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Justice Todd Eddins struck a nerve in the land of conservative (anti)Republican bloviators. The National Review posted Hawaii Justices’ Stunning Screed Against the U.S. Supreme Court,  whihch included wailing and gnashing such as "ongoing disregard for the rulings of the United States Supreme Court," "a meandering, nine-page broadside against the U.S. Supreme Court," "ugly and unhinged" and

Pages 72 through 80 are worth reading in full, if only to marvel at the scope and arrogance of the digression, spanning voting rights, campaign finance, abortion, religious liberty, the Second Amendment, the major questions doctrine, Chevron deference, the spending power, the removal power, and birthright citizenship.

[Reason magazine, the libertarian operation that destroyed the empathy and social conscience of generations of computer geeks and tech lords, carried Is The Hawaii Supreme Court's "Aloha Spirit" Consistent With A Republican Form Of Government? ]

 

Republicans Try to Smother OSHA Heat Standard Under General Duty Clause

To the surprise of no one, the Republican-controlled House Education and Workforce Committee yesterday approved H.R. 6213, the Heat Workforce Standards Act of 2025, a bill to stop OSHA from issuing a workplace heat standard “substantially similar” to the strong 2024 Biden proposal.

The discussion at the markup was not uninteresting. (If you missed it, you can still watch it here.)

 

The People Own the Constitution, Not the Court

Josh Marshall, July 20, 2026 [Talking Points Memo]

 

America Has Eight Political Tribes. Which One Do You Belong to?

[New York Times, via Naked Capitalism 07-22-2026]

 

NYT’s Embarrassing Anti-DSA Meltdown 

[FAIR, via Naked Capitalism 07-24-2026]

... The New York Times (e.g., 6/16/25) has been vocal about its desire to keep DSA-backed candidates out of office, especially Mamdani. The recent momentum for DSA inspired the paper to publish a news story (7/19/26) that painted DSA’s pro-tenant, pro-worker, tax-the-rich platform not as a threat to the monied class, but as the project of white gentrifiers suppressing Black and Latino electoral power....

A March poll found that Mamdani’s net approval rating, which is +10 points among white New Yorkers, is +23 among Latino voters and +42  among Black voters. Compare that to former Mayor Eric Adams, whose 2021 nomination “seemed to signal a high-water mark for Black political power” in New York City, according to the Times piece: In his last year in office, his net approval rating among Black voters was -36 (Quinnipiac, 3/5/25)....

 

Information age dystopia / surveillance state

AI solipsists and AI cynics (24 Jul 2026)

Cory Doctorow,  July 24, 2026 [Pluralistic]

As a technology, AI isn't exceptional. It's not exceptionally wicked. It's not exceptionally good. Take away the accompanying, galactic-scale stock-swindle, and we'd call AI's applications "plug-ins" and we'd use them and abuse them in the same way that we've used every other technology:

https://www.normaltech.ai/

As a destructive economic pathology, AI is extraordinary. AI boosters have spent a baffling and terrifying sum of money – over $1.4T, most of that in the past year – on the promise of making as many workers unemployed as possible, while lowering the wages of the meager survivors of this jobspocalypse. To make things worse, AI can't do the jobs it's replacing: AI is predicated on the premise that the monopolies, duopolies and cartels that control the global economy can deliberately worsen their products without suffering economic or regulatory consequences, because they're the only game in town....

 

AI does not appear to be boosting productivity, analysts at Barclays have said 

[Telegraph, via Naked Capitalism 07-25-2026]

 

The Strange Inner Life of Self-Driving Cars

[Wired, via The Big Picture, July 21, 2026]

What Waymo’s vehicles “see” and “think” — the hallucinations, the edge cases, the weird decisions. The AI behind the wheel is both more capable and more alien than you’d expect.

 

Collapse of independent news media

 

Climate and environmental crises

Here’s how your peanut butter jar — and nearly everything else — can be recycled - There’s a way to fix the American recycling system. It involves AI-powered sensors and massive machinery.

[Washington Post, July 21, 2026]

 

Democrats' political malpractice

We’re Still Living In The 2016 Election - Bernie Sanders’ chief campaign strategist says Democrats rigged the 2016 presidential primary — and started a fight the party is still having today.

David Sirota, July 16, 2026 [The Lever]

 

Whitmer’s War Against Medicare For All

David Sirota, July 16, 2026 [The Lever]

... El-Sayed has devoted his adult life to championing Medicare For All — he literally wrote the book on it — and has based his Senate campaign around a promise to make it a reality. He is a huge threat to the private health insurance industry. Stevens, by contrast, is an opponent of Medicare For All. She is no threat to that industry.

And so with El-Sayed surging in the polls, Stevens is getting a lifeline from Whitmer — a politician with familial and campaign finance ties to a major health insurance corporation whose business could be limited or ended by Medicare For All....

 

The Resistance Liberal Lawyers Helping Trump Take Over the Media

Matt Stoller, July 24, 2026 [BIG]

 

Resistance

The Epstein Survivors Justice Act: How States Can Reopen the Epstein Case, Pardon or No Pardon - The fight is just getting started.

Christopher Armitage, July 24, 2026 [The Existentialist Republic]

This is version 3.0 of the bill, previously published as the Child Sex Trafficking Investigation and Accountability Act, revised and strengthened for this release. Everything that follows is built from existing and long standing legal precedent.

The primary provisions of the Act, in plain terms:

  • State attorneys general get Martin Act-style subpoena power: they can compel documents and testimony before any charges are filed, with no probable cause showing required.
  • Use immunity lets prosecutors compel testimony from witnesses invoking the Fifth Amendment, the same mechanism that dismantled organized crime networks.
  • No federal referral, cooperation, or approval is required, and a federal decision not to charge means nothing under state law.
  • A presidential pardon reaches federal offenses only and has no effect on a state prosecution.
  • Federal agents who obstruct the investigation can be prosecuted, and federal employment provides no immunity for openly criminal obstruction of justice.
  • There is no statute of limitations going forward for child sex trafficking, and the limitations period is paused while a perpetrator conceals evidence or occupies public office.
  • New in 3.0: a three-year revival window reopens civil cases that courts previously dismissed as too old.
  • New in 3.0: survivors can sue anyone who knowingly profited from the operation, including financial institutions, not just the abusers themselves.
  • New in 3.0: the attorney general can order records preserved from the day the law passes, and destroying them afterward is a felony.
  • Fines and forfeitures from convictions finance a Survivors’ Compensation Fund, so the perpetrators pay for the recovery.
  • If the attorney general refuses to act, any resident can bring the civil case for the state and keep up to twenty-five percent of the recovery.
  • If the attorney general or the governor is implicated, a special prosecutor is appointed, and anyone convicted is permanently barred from public office in the state.

 

Want Supreme Court Term Limits? Here’s How to Do It - The Brennan Center has laid out a compelling roadmap for Congress to follow

Jesse Wegman, July 20, 2026 [via scotusblog.com, July 22, 2026]

In a post for his Substack, Jesse Wegman explored the Brennan Center’s “new memo on Supreme Court term limits,” which “makes the case for why Congress has the power” under the Constitution’s necessary and proper clause “to institute term limits through federal statute, no constitutional amendment required.” Congress could impose “18-year terms for justices, followed by a shift to senior status. Senior justices would no longer sit on the nine-member Court. Instead, their duties would change to include sitting by designation on lower federal courts.” “When Congress was in the business of actually using its legislative powers over the Supreme Court, it relied on [the necessary and proper] clause all the time: to set the number of justices, or the Court’s jurisdiction, or the timing of its term, and so on,” Wegman observed, contending that “court reformers should see the Constitution as a friend, not a foe.”

 

Conservative / Libertarian / (anti)Republican Drive to Civil War

North Carolina was the dress rehearsal for MAGA - The state offers lessons for the country.

Thomas Mills, July 21, 2026 [PoliticsNC]

... In January 2013, Republicans took control of North Carolina state government for the first time in more than a century. They moved quickly to upend state agencies and purge them of Democratic influence. They slashed and burned, often with no obvious intent to rebuild.

In the legislature, Republicans introduced legislation so brazen that even some of their own members seemed shocked. They introduced bills to create a state religion. They allowed guns on campuses and in bars. They flattened the progressive income tax, shifting the burden from the wealthy and corporations onto the middle and working class. They ended teacher tenure and banned Sharia Law. They put limits on abortion and drug-tested welfare recipients. They began solidifying their power by making nonpartisan school board elections partisan, stripping authority from local governments, introducing voter ID bills, reducing early voting days, and ending public financing of judicial campaigns.

Republicans moved with breathtaking speed. Democrats were paralyzed and unable to muster any effective response. The press was overwhelmed and couldn’t keep up with the flood of stories coming out of Raleigh or offer the context needed....

As their policies shifted the state hard to the right, they changed the rules to lock in their power. Extreme gerrymandering effectively gave Republicans veto-proof majorities in the legislature and nine of the state’s 13 US House districts, even as Democrats won a majority of the Congressional votes and half of the legislative ones cast in the state.

North Carolina state Representative David Lewis, chair of the Redistricting Committee, famously said, “I propose that we draw the maps to give a partisan advantage to 10 Republicans and 3 Democrats because I do not believe it’s possible to draw a map with 11 Republicans and 2 Democrats.” A North Carolina lawsuit, Rucho v. Common Cause, validated gerrymandering for partisan gain and set the stage for the national redistricting wars ahead of the 2026 midterms....

 

Civic republicanism

Last week, I presented the online archived second volume of Mathew Carey's 1788 American Museum; or Repository of Ancient and Modern Fugitive Pieces &c. Prose and Poetical.  I explained the important role played by Carey's publishing firms in industrial development of USA.

One thing I noted in perusing Number 1 was a few mentions of Sir James Steuart, an 18th century Scottish economist who some honest historians have identified as being a more important influence on the founding of the American republic than British empire apologist Adam Smith. Here's an exercise you can try yourself: do a text search for Adam Smith in the American Museum. My search yielded zero hits. Very interesting, given that around half the contents of the American Museum dealt with subjects of political economy. 

Joseph Schumpeter, one of the most influential economists of the twentieth century, in his last book (which was never finished) History of Economic Analysis (pdf), acknowledged that Smith obtained enormous influence as a peddler of specific economic doctrines, but noted that Sir James Steuart's An Inquiry into the Principles of Political Economy (1767) had "more originality and deeper thought than does the Wealth of Nations." So, why do we remember Smith today, and not Steuart? Schumpeter concluded that Steuart "was never much of a success in England," as a result of the elite disfavor Steuart faced for being a Jacobite adherent of restoring the Catholic Stuarts to the throne of the United Kingdom. 

Schumpeter concluded that Adam Smith's undeniable success in Great Britain was due to English elites' favor for "the policies he advocated—free trade, laissez-faire, colonial policy, and so on." In other words, Adam Smith was crowned with success for being a prominent apologist for the exploitative brutality of the British empire:

....it was Adam Smith’s good fortune that he was thoroughly in sympathy with the humors of his time. He advocated the things that were in the offing, and he made his analysis serve them. Needless to insist on what this meant both for performance and success: where would the Wealth of Nations be without free trade and laissez-faire? Also, the ‘unfeeling’ or ‘slothful’ landlords who reap where they have not sown, the employers whose every meeting issues in conspiracy, the merchants who enjoy themselves and let their clerks and accountants do the work, and the poor laborers who support the rest of society in luxury—these are all important parts of the show. It has been held that A.Smith, far ahead of his time, braved unpopularity by giving expression to his social sympathies. This is not so. His sincerity I do not for a moment call into question. But those views were not unpopular. They were in fashion. 

In fact, as Smith biographer Salim Rushid details, Adam Smith very carefully and deliberately went about currying favor with Scottish and English ruling elites. Rushid writes, that during his time "Adam Smith was not hailed as a new prophet except by some few, but very influential, persons such as Lord Shelburne and William Pitt." Adam Smith was merely a paid apologist for the ruin and misery Great Britain imposed on millions of colonial people in Ireland, Africa, China, India, and elsewhere. As Philippine economic historian Erle Frayne Argonza wrote in September 2008:

To continue on the theme of laissez faire, a doctrine started by the French physiocrats and systematized further by the Scots, let it be known that the principle of ‘free trade’ generated by physiocracy was largely a doctrinal defense of slave trade....  Adam Smith was an ‘intellectual prostitute’ whose services were procured by the British East India Company, precisely for the purpose of crafting in theoretical form the ‘free trade’ doctrine that was to justify, though subtly, the slave trade of that historic juncture. 
The historical record of what was actually taught in USA as political economy in the nineteenth century, shows that Adam Smith was rejected in favor of economic doctrines developed indigenously by Americans, especially in Pennsylvania and the northeast.  In Origins of Academic Economics in the United States (Columbia University Press, 1944), Michael J.L. O’Connor notes that the first American edition of Smith’s Wealth of Nations did not appear until some years after the American Revolution. Jefferson termed it the best book on political economy in 1790, but by 1810 Jefferson was more impressed with the work of the Frenchmen Antoine Destutt de Tracy (who coined the term "ideology") and Jean B. Say.  A third edition of Smith was published in Hartford in 1818. O’Conner observes that 53 years then passed before another edition was published in the United States. (Though O’Conner postulates that what demand there was in the US was met “by the numerous cheap foreign editions.”)

 
O’Conner found that in the late 1830s and afterwards, the most popular “principal text” used to teach economics in the USA was Elements of Political Economy, by  Francis Wayland, pastor of Boston's First Baptist Church and later president of Brown University. While American publishers ignored Adam Smith entirely, editions of Wayland were published in 1837, 1838 (New York); 1840, 1841, 1843, 1846, 1848, 1849, 1850, 1851, 1852, 1853, 1854,1855, 1856, 1858, 1859, 1860, 1867, 1868, 1869, 1873  (Boston); and 1875 (New York). In 1878, Presbyterian minister Aaron L. Chapin, founder and president of Beloit College (the oldest continuously operated college in Wisconsin) extensively revised Wayland, and this new edition was published in 1878, 1879, 1880, 1882, 1883, 1884, 1885, and 1906. (O’Conner, page 174)
 
By comparison, O’Conner noted, after the Hartford 1818 edition, another edition of Adam Smith was not published until 1871.
 
In his article "Francis Wayland's 1830s Textbooks: Evangelical Ethics and Political Economy," (Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2002), Donald E. Frey wrote, "A comparison of book sales to college enrollments suggests that Wayland's Political Economy served a greater proportion of the market of its day than Paul Samuelson's Economics did between 1948-1980."
 
In the excellent and highly readable study of Abraham Lincoln’s economic beliefs (Lincoln and the Economics of the American Dream, Memphis State University Press, 1978), Gabor Boritt noted that Lincoln’s Springfield law partner, William Herndon, recalled that Lincoln read Henry C. Carey and Francis Wayland (Elements of Political Economy). No mention was made of Adam Smith. As Boritt observed, “It is remarkable that in 1886 his former partner still remembered Lincoln’s special liking for this by then rather forgotten book.” (p122) 
 
Simply put, Adam Smith was a factotum for the British oligarchy, and as such, was fundamentally hostile to the United States and its grand experiment in self-government and republicanism. This marks the cultural conflict with the continuing existence of monarchy and oligarchy in Britain. 
 
In 1834, there was published in Boston a little book entitled Tracts on Sundry Topics of Political Economy, written by Oliver Putnam, a sickly but wealthy merchant of Newburyport, Massachusetts. To preserve his health, Putnam retired in his thirties, but busied himself with an intense study of political economy. Putnam's ideas were informed by his travels throughout the U.S. and Europe, travels he had undertaken in search of a cure for his ailments. The second part of the book is entitled "Observations on Smith's Wealth of Nations," and I venture to assert they were typical of American views of Smith, and British political economy in general, in the mid-1800s. 
In the following remarks, the writer's aim has been briefly to expose the fallacy... of doctrines, which, he conceives, are of tendency injurious to the welfare of his country. Adam Smith has founded a school in political economy... too plausible in the defence and too zealous in the advancement of their favorite theory, not to have gained a host of proselytes. What influence they may obtain abroad, is of little consequence to us; or certain it is, rather, that the more influence they do exert in Europe, the better they will promote the interests of America. But it is time for us to be vigilant and circumspect, when men and men of letters among us, who deservedly possess great credit in the public mind, profess themselves emulous to pin their faith on the infallibility of Adam Smith. When this becomes apparent, it is evidently time to exhibit the proofs of his fallibility, and of the pernicious effects arising from injudicious application of his theories to practice. . . . 
As Americans, also, we are all bound to take exception to his illiberal reflections on the dispute, which led to the revolutionary war, and on our causes of complaint against the mother country.— We have not been sufficiently awake to the mischievous effects of introducing many English writings into our seminaries of education, and of giving credence to their authors on subjects of political economy and politics. —It is a truism to say that our institutions are radically different from the English. Ours are throughout republican, theirs are substantially monarchical. Theirs are the oft-changed remnants of feudal barbarism; ours are a great political invention, which undergoes its first trial in this country.—And yet we have Blackstone and Paley for our text books in politics, who, whatever may be their excellencies on other accounts, are certainly the bigoted advocates, the courtly apologists, of whatever, in the system of the British government, is corrupt in itself, and most adverse to the genius and principles of our own government.
And so also we take Smith as our magnus Apollo in political economy, the basis of whose theory is, that the country gentlemen, that is, the landed aristocracy, of Britain, are the only class for whose benefit government is instituted, laws enacted, or who deserve the regard of the statesman, and that all the other productive classes, the mechanical, the manufacturing, the mercantile, are a set of sharpers, who have been constantly engaged, ever since the Conquest, in a conspiracy to defraud the simple, innocent, and defenceless country gentlemen, and to impoverish and ruin the country. These are strong terms, but they are not stronger than the text warrants. . . Surely it is not for our interest to allow the opinions of our national enemy to acquire a kind of prescriptive authority in the country.—It is not for our interest to place the writings of our national enemy in the hands of our youth, and thus administer, ourselves, poisoned aliment to the lips of the rising generation. 
...Adam Smith... takes pains to ridicule our colonial legislatures as little knots of factious rebels... he sneers at the high minded men, who composed our continental congress, as being upstart shopkeepers and attorneys, animated only with the little pride of becoming provincial dukes and marquises... he stigmatises, with the grossest terms of opprobrium, the master spirits of seventy-six, Washington and Adams, Franklin and Jefferson and their compeers, whose glorious names are and will be the watchword of millions, who shall never dream of the learned Glasgow sage's existence. Americans may not be apprised of these things; but they ought to be, ere they determine to repose implicit reliance upon the opinions of Adam Smith. 
The opinions of Adam Smith on this subject, are introduced here, not for the purpose of refuting them, for they do not deserve so much attention; but only to hold them up to the reprobation and indignation of an insulted people. 
Let it be holden in remembrance then, that, in treating of colonies, he traduces, in good set phrases, the whole American people. 

If not Adam Smith, then whose ideas provided the basis of the new USA economy?

Simple. The USA economy was built on the ideas of Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury. But that's not what has been taught in university economic courses for over a century.

 

 

.