Saturday, June 4, 2011

Who controls the moneychangers?

Because if a democratically elected government does not control its banks, the banks will certainly control the government.

This is by FAR, the most important public policy question.  And I greatly admire those who even attempt to address this most serious dilemma.  I love the purity of this guy's argument--for him this is about the principles of democracy itself.  Me? I get lost a long way before I end up in a room discussing the philosophy of democratic control.  For me the reasons banks should subjected to rigorous social controls are simple--when we let the moneychangers make public policy decisions, they are freaking terrible at it and they cost way, WAY too much for the "services" they supposedly provide.

There is something just wrong about the idea that traders playing video games with electronic money should be allowed to determine the course of health care delivery or whether a country should manufacture its own shoes or a thousand other examples.  These people have no real skills so they resort to the tactics of terrorists, "Give us all your money or we will wreck your economy.  And trust us, we can do it--we regularly crash significant parts of the real economy by accident because lacking important knowledge of the real economy, we resort to primitive ideologies that have no known benefit to life on earth except they DO make US richer."  And for pleasure of getting this naked threat we are told that these vile little creatures should be paid insane multiples of the President's salary for the important job of "allocating capital."

Can the guillotine be far away?

Dignity and Democracy
Escaping the Clutches of the Financial Markets
An Essay by Dirk Kurbjuweit     06/03/2011 
In today's Europe, the people are no longer in control. Instead, politicians have become slaves to financial institutions and the markets. We are partly to blame -- and changes are urgently needed to nurse European democracy back to health.
We (Germans) are doing well. In fact, we're doing splendidly. The economy is booming, with 1.5 percent growth in the first quarter. We are as prosperous as we were before the crisis, which has finally been overcome. Congratulations are in order for everyone.
The banks, Deutsche Bank above all, deserve particular congratulations. In the first quarter, it earned €3.5 billion ($5.1 billion) in pretax profits in its core business, and by the end of the year the bank will likely report a record €10 billion in pretax profits, its best results ever. That number is expected to rise to €11 billion or even €12 billion in two or three years.
Less than three years after the peak of the crisis, it seems as if it never happened. That is true of the economy, but it also true of us as economic subjects. But is that all we are?
No, we are also citizens and participants in a democratic society. As such, we have no reason to be celebrating. Instead, we ought to be sad and outraged. Democracy, after all, is not doing splendidly, or even well. It is gradually becoming a casualty of the financial crisis.
Rage Directed at Politicians
Trouble is brewing all over Europe. Young people with little hope for the future are protesting in Spain. In France, 1.4 million copies were sold of a manifesto titled "Be Outraged." Young Frenchmen and -women are devising utopias that extend well beyond civil society because they no longer expect anything from it. A deep depression has descended upon Greece, combined with a rage directed at politicians and the rest of Europe.
In Germany, this is what politicians are hearing from their citizens today: "You spent billions to rescue the banks, and now I'm supposed to be footing the bill? Forget it!" Hardly anyone is willing to put up with their politicians any more. And German leaders have lost support -- and some of their own legitimacy.
They seem helpless, unable to come to grips with the euro crisis. They meet in Brussels, and they talk, argue and adopt resolutions, and yet nothing improves. Greece isn't getting out of its hole, Ireland and Portugal are teetering on the brink, and Spain and Italy are heavily indebted to a dangerous degree. And no politician is providing leadership.
And then there were the lies. Jean-Claude Juncker, the prime minister of Luxembourg, had his spokesman deny that a meeting of European Union finance ministers on the Greek crisis was taking place, even though that meeting was in fact taking place. It wasn't the kind of lie that frequently crops up in politics: the broken campaign promise. Rather, it was more crass type of untruth: the denial of a reality. Juncker no longer had the courage to speak the truth. He was guided by fear of the financial markets. His lie was a capitulation of politics.
Things Will Have to Change
This is what is so disturbing about the current situation: the fact that politicians seem so helpless and powerless. They have been given a new master, and it's not us, the people, who tend to intervene in milder ways. Rather, it's the ruthless financial markets. The markets drive politicians even further into anxiety, weakness, incapacity and lies. Those who govern us are now being governed by the banks. That's the situation.
We could decide that we don't care because the economic figures are so good. But that would mean we are happy to play the role of the economic subject, to invest and spend money, all the while abandoning the original promise of democracy. Or we can say: We refuse to relinquish our role and political masters. But if that's our decision, things will have to change.
How has this happened? What are the consequences? And how do we extricate ourselves from this situation? more


  1. I hate to give the politicians a break, but it is the banksters and the masters of the universe who own them that need to accept the blame for The Great Denial we are living in. They created an obvious inflated housing and over-development bubble, and then created financial instruments to wildly profit on it, and then created a public bailout scheme to fund it even after it collapses, and then had the audacity to skim off full bonuses to celebrate their 'wisdom'.

    As soon as enough people figure that out AND stop wasting their time pointing at the weathervane politicians who provide cover for these banksters, banking as we know it will cease as people find other ways to fund their needs.

    Another thing people need to realize is the one legitimate industry that investment bankers should pursue is green energy, yet they tiptoe in as if it is radioactive (actually radioactive for some odd reason appeals to these MOTUs, go figure). Some day soon people will fugure that out too, and all these clues will confirm their decisions to no longer give their money to our modern intellectually corrupted banking system.

  2. Thanks for this Mike. Just so you know, I have been pitching green energy as THE essential necessary investment since the 1970s. It is at the core of Elegant Technology. So I always welcome support from others who get it.

    I hope Kurbjuweit is still in his 20s. It would nice to see a young person who understands the big issues!

  3. I do appreciate your efforts, greatly. Such an uphill battle against entrenched special interests and the mass of unaware sheeple absorbed in debt-ridden comforts.

    This was one of the eye-popping tidbits I've picked up this last year, which gives an idea for how long the answer has been known and ignored by the masters of the universe--
    "I'd put my money on the sun and solar energy." --Thomas Alva Edison talking to Henry Ford and Harvey Firestone in 1931

    Here are 3 of Americas supposed greatest inventors talking. One can only wonder if any part of the early conservation activists, say Sigurd Olson, had been successful in convincing such inventors toward wind and solar...but I'm dreaming, right...coal and oil was already too entrenched by 1931, no?