And compared to now, we actually were somewhat prepared to cope with the economic calamity of 1929-1940.
10 Million Americans Disappeared during the Great Depression Time
While America lectures Russia on the 1932-33 famine in Ukraine, Russian historian Boris Borisov asks what became of over seven million American citizens who disappeared from US population records in the 1930s.
RT: What made you research the history of what you call "American Holodomor"?
B.B: It was very simple. As I was doing comparative research of the American Great Depression in the 1930s, and the Great Depression of the 1990s in Russia, I grew interested in the social dimension of the tragedy. It was logical that I looked up official American documents and found out that the discrepancies were so obvious that any independent researcher would not but have doubt about the official U.S. statistic data. All appears to be rather interesting. I will come to that later.
The U.S. Congress added fuel to the fire by adopting resolutions nearly every year blaming the Soviet government for alleged staged famine in the 1930s in Ukraine. The first resolution came in 1988, 50 years after the events described. The current members of Congress wonder about the following, and I quote, "people in the government were aware of what was going on, but did not do anything to help the starving".
At that very period of 1930s, the wealthy city of New York saw kilometre-long lines of people for free soup. There were no queues on the city"s main streets though, but not because there were no hungry people but because most of the cities did not have any money ? they were just bankrupt.
So, I became curious about that and carried out some research that brought about interesting results.
RT: You say that America of the early 1930s made over seven million people perish. It"s a horrifying figure and it needs an explanation. What do you base your research on and why do you say the population statistics of the U.S. government of 1932-33 was falsified?
B.B.: Seven and a half million people does not mean the number of particular victims of the famine, but a general demographic loss, or the difference between the supposed population on the date of the census that was due to be held in 1940 and the factual number of people. In reality, the total demographic loss is bigger. The fact is not contested by anyone. The figure is more than ten million people. more
This is a longer post, but it corrects the false and misleading information about 7 million Americans dying in a famine in the 1930s. If you read until the end, you will find out how this pro-Russia, anti-America "news" outlet allowed a man to post his twisted understanding of historical facts to fit his own narrative.
ReplyDeleteWhen doing critical analysis of a new claim, you need to look at the author's credibility, any potential bias, and the facts they used.
The burden of proof lies on the one making the new claim. Let's look at the article. The author is Boris Borisov, and he is listed as a historian and wrote "Where did America’s missing millions go? Holodomor Lessons." The author puts his entire claim on 1 faulty calculation that he based on the US population from 1910-1940, and he doesn't fully understand the low birth rate at that time, the number of deportations, the huge drop in immigration, and the increase in emigration.
Let's see how people bite Boris' big bait and get hooked.
Comrade Boris' article was written on April 4, 2008 and was first posted on Russia Today on Oct 15, 2008.Russia Today is the first Russian 24/7 English-language news channel which brings the Russian view on global news. They are funded by the Russian government and their American news company (RT America) was ordered to register as a foreign agent in 2017 because they participate in political activity. They complied. In other countries, RT has been fined for biased reporting (and they paid the fine), and RT reporters have quit due to RT's disinformation campaigns.
Comrade Boris' original article is supposed to be at rt.com/features/news/31913/ but the website shows a 404 error. It is archived at Wayback Machine's web archive from Oct 18, 2008. Why would RT remove Comrade Boris' article from their website? That webpage has been showing an error for years.
They kept his interview about his original article from Oct 22, 2008. rt.com/usa/interview-with-boris-borisov/
First, who is Boris Borisov? What credentials does he have? Has he written any books? Has he published any peer-reviewed articles in any journals? Does he teach at a university? Does he have a history of quality journalism? Who is his employer? Nothing is listed about him except that he is a historian. This is his only article on RT.
What bias might he have? Look at the title and his last sentence. In 2008, Russia was getting a lot of bad press from the US and other countries about the Ukrainian famine (Holodomor) that occurred in 1932, and Comrade Boris was trying to compare that to the 1930s in America. When Stalin led the Soviet Union, an estimated 5-7 million people starved to death. His last line says "In fact, the U.S. should stop barking at Russia, which they usually do, and sniff their own butt instead." He is prejudiced against America for chastising Russia and is looking to find a "you did it too" event. He also calls America the "Western Evil Empire."
Comrade Boris makes several false claims at the beginning of his article.
He writes "just like you won’t find anything on the genocide of the indigenous people. American politicians don’t give passionate speeches on the subject."
He hasn't done enough research because in 2000, the "the head of the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs apologized Friday for the agency's "legacy of racism and inhumanity" that included massacres, forced relocations of tribes and attempts to wipe out Indian languages and cultures." washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20000908/aponline153014_000.htm
Ouch Boris! You're loosing credibility!
Comrade Boris writes, "Of course, according to the American version of history 'millions of men, women and children became the victims the criminal and cruel totalitarian regime in the Soviet Union'. American history cannot be described in these terms. Let’s disprove this myth, using American sources."
ReplyDeleteLater in his footnotes, he says "U.S. information is not reliable."
Ok Boris. You're going to try and prove something with information you don't think is reliable. That makes a lot of sense.
Comrade Boris also claims "statistics from 1932 were destroyed – or hidden very well. They just don’t exist. No explanation is given." If you look on the Statistical Abstracts page, the explanation says "Note: No abstract was prepared for year 1932." census.gov/library/publications/time-series/statistical_abstracts.html
They also didn't prepare an Abstract in 1923 or 1927. Boom! Another hit on Boris!
Comrade Boris isn't looking at the correct population chart. He falsely claims "the numbers of increase in population change at one point by 2 times - exactly at the border betwee [there was no "n" in the article] 1930/31. They fall and freeze at this level for 10 years. And just as suddenly, a decade later, they climb back up."
Wrong again Comrade! According to the Vital Statistics of the United States (Census Bureau) publication, the US population increased by about 1 million people every year from 1930-1940. It never falls and freezes. Never! Boom! Strike 3! books.google.com.ph/books?id=JsR6qeDfUtwC&pg=RA3-PA16&lpg=RA3-PA16&dq=125,690,000+1933+population&source=bl&ots=O39uEogv2c&sig=ACfU3U0RLv49ZtV-5qfQ6E7bf4W0MTsXrA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj8_82mx9XoAhUVL6YKHRHUDTUQ6AEwCnoECAwQLw#v=onepage&q=125%2C690%2C000%201933%20population&f=false
Comrade Boris is only looking at the Statistical Abstracts data between 1931 to 1940. Why he used these statistical summaries (that include social, political, and economic data) as opposed to the actual census data, we'll never know.
He tries to make the claim that there should have been about a 15% increase in the US population from 1930-1940. In 1932, there were about 125 million people, and by 1940, Comrade Boris thought there should have been around 141 million people, but there were only around 132 million people.
He writes, "According to the calculations, in 1940, the US population should have amounted to at least 141,856,000 people, given that the previous demographic tendency was preserved."
What calculations? What tendency? He doesn't list them or provide any statistical modeling. My theory is that he looked at the previous 20 years and tried to come up with a projected number. He didn't look at 30 years ago, 40, 50, 60, etc. He limited himself to a narrow window of 20 years.
Let's look at the US Population table at census.gov/population/censusdata/table-4.pdf
1940 (Apr. 1) 132,164,569
1930 (Apr. 1) 123,202,624
1920 (Jan. 1) 106,021,537
1910 (Apr. 15) 92,228,496
1900 (June 1) 76,212,168
From 1930-1940, there was an increase of 7.3%. From 1920-1930, there was an increase of 16.2%. From 1910-1920, there was an increase of 15%. From 1900-1910, there was an increase of 21%.
My theory is that Comrade Boris calculated that since 1920-1930 had an increase of 16.2% and 1910-1920 had an increase of 15%, 1930-1940 should have had a similar number. His projection of at least 141,856,000 people by 1940 means he was expecting a 15.14% increase in the population. When this did not happen, he concluded that millions of people died.
What he failed to acknowledge was that since 1880, the population rate had been declining. The population was increasing, but not as quickly. Look at the full census chart on that webpage. It was growing quickly around 1880 but had not grown as fast since then. Why didn't Comrade Boris balk at the 6% drop (21%->15%) from 1910-1920?
Comrade Boris says "we can surely say there were around 5 million victims of the Holodomor of 1932/33 in the United States."
ReplyDeleteWhat other historians have verified this claim? None.
Where are the graves of 5 million people dying in one year? They don't exist.Influenza killed around 675,000 Americans in 1918 and there are plenty of facts, pictures, and data about that. But nothing was recorded about 5 million people dying in 1932? Come on, Comrade.
Go look at the mortality statistics for 1932 and 1933 on the census. cdc.gov/nchs/products/vsus/vsus_1890_1938.htm
1932 - the top killers were cancer, heart disease, and kidney infections (page 11). No starvation. No malnutrition.
1933 - the top killers were tuberculosis, cancer, blood clots, and heart disease (pages 36-39). No starvation. No malnutrition.
If you look at the RT interview with Comrade Boris posted above, he says "Seven and a half million people does not mean the number of particular victims of the famine, but a general demographic loss, or the difference between the supposed population on the date of the census that was due to be held in 1940 and the factual number of people."
So a week after he posted that article, Comrade Boris is now saying that they all didn't die of a famine.
Comrade Boris used an unknown statistical model to predict how many people should have been alive by a certain year, and when reality didn't fit his prediction, he made up the claim that people had died. Why was there a drop in population numbers? A low birth rate, deportations, a huge drop in immigration, and an increase in emigration.
The birth rate was already dropping in the late 1920s. The number of births was the lowest it has ever been in 1933. If you look at 1900-1929, and then from 1940-2000, you can see that the number of births were at the lowest point in the 1930s. cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/t001x01.pdf
Immigration dropped by at least 50%. For each decade since 1900, immigration was around 8 million, 6 million, and 4 million. In the 1930s, it was 699,375. That means at least 2-3 million potential immigrants were denied entry or didn't come to the USA because of the economic depression. dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Yearbook_Immigration_Statistics_2008.pdf Table 2, page 13
1-2 million Mexicans were deported in the 1930s. Boom! Comrade Boris didn't mention that! These numbers did not show up on the emigration tables. theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/americas-brutal-forgotten-history-of-illegal-deportations/517971/
Around 2.5 million emigrants departed from 1930-1940. page 23 census.gov/library/publications/1949/compendia/hist_stats_1789-1945/hist_stats_1789-1945-chB.pdf
That's about 7 million people.The population from 1930-1940 increased from 123 million people to 132 million. Comrade Boris was predicting 141 million based on the growth rate of the previous 20 years. What are some reasons for not as many people being recorded on the census? People were deported, emigrated (he does mention this), had a low birth rate (he mentions this too), barred from entry to the States due to President Hoover's strict immigration policy that was modified in 1929, died (but not 5 million in one year), or just didn't fill out the census form.
Boom!
In conclusion, what other credible news outlets have posted Comrade Boris' article? None.
Since 2008, there have been a few fringe blog sites, conspiracy theory sites, and small news aggregate sites that host it.
Comrade Boris may only be familiar with a government controlled media outlet. In the US, there is freedom of the press. Countless independent journalists, newspaper writers, and photographers crisscrossed the country in the 1930s and reported on events. Not a single picture, newspaper article, or report was ever written about millions of Americans dying of a famine. The US census data confirms there was not millions of people dying in 1 year. The population was increasing, the mortality rate was dropping, and the life expectancy was growing.
This is a clever riff on the work of Robert Conquest in his book, "Bitter Harvest." In it, he uses Bolshevik population statistics to estimate the number of dead in the Holodomor. This is also why Borisov claims the US 1932 and 1933 Census statistics were forged and undependable - the famous Bolshevik census of 1937, which recorded a sharp drop in population. Stalin had, prior to the census, signaled very strongly the numbers that he expected, but for some reason the census leaders did not get the message. The unusually low (and probably accurate) numbers that followed led to the trials and executions of many people involved in that census. A subsequent census was held two years later, which produced the desired numbers, and no new census was authorized for decades afterward.
ReplyDeleteI expect Mr Putin sent one of his employees to have a bit of fun with us.