Sunday, July 6, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – July 06, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – July 06, 2025

by Tony Wikrent


Trump not violating any law

'He who saves his Country does not violate any Law'


Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025 [mediaite.com]


Welcome to the Age of Disappearance: America's new era of secret police 

Hamilton Nolan, July 02, 2025 [How Things Work]

...an avalanche of new funding for the Department of Homeland Security, ICE, and anti-immigration measures is, in fact, coming. This is going to spill well past the bounds of what any sane person would consider to be “immigration enforcement.” It is going to create a lavishly funded, unaccountable, quasi-secret police force that will transform our nation for the worse. Very soon.

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about the terrifying scale of this new funding. This bill contains enough money to build a new system of immigration detention centers far bigger than the entire federal prison system. The American Immigration Council says that it will be enough to facilitate the “daily detention of at least 116,000 non-citizens.” It will let ICE hire more field agents than the FBI. Its $170 billion in funding for Stephen Miller’s rabid campaign to purge America of brown people is comparable to the total annual funding for the United States Army.

Donald Trump envisions himself as an all-powerful leader whose will is equal to law. He is bent on revenge against his political enemies. He has installed extreme loyalists in the Justice Department, the FBI, the Defense Department, the Department of Homeland Security, and all other security departments. The courts have declined to meaningfully restrain his abuses of these departments. This budget will give him the final piece of the puzzle that he needs to achieve his fever dream: a nationwide army of masked, unaccountable armed agents empowered to snatch anyone they like off the streets, and the physical infrastructure to imprison or deport those people at will. Thousands of men with guns, unrestrained by judges or local police, who do not answer to Congress, who point guns at the press, who arrest whoever they want, for reasons they do not share, and do whatever they wish with those people. The implications of this are going to make America a much darker place….

...ICE has already arrested a number of Democratic elected officials, including mayors and members of Congress and a judge. In this environment, it is a trivial matter for Trump and his loyalists to concoct reasons to arrest almost anyone. People can be arrested if they are immigrants, if they look like they might be immigrants, if they illegally harbored or assisted immigrants, or if they somehow impeded ICE’s quest to arrest immigrants. The mission can and will be scaled up from “deport immigrants” to “punish those who want to stand in the way of our mission.”….



16 Thoughts On The Republican Budget Atrocity

Brian Beutler, July 03, 2025 [Off Message]

  • Quite apart from the economics, this secret police force and the prison network that will be built for it, is the most repugnant and frightening aspect of the bill; Medicaid can be funded again, food stamps can be funded again, clean energy can be funded, taxes can be increased progressively. But an immigrant prison network, overseen by Trump-loyal paramilitaries, with no resources for due process, will be very hard to dislodge, and could easily be turned against the citizenry. This is Stephen Miller’s wet dream and it will stain the whole country….


Trump falsely questions Zohran Mamdani’s citizenship, threatens to arrest him over ICE operations 

[ABC, via Naked Capitalism 07-02-2025]


Trump’s Threat to Deport Mamdani Isn’t a Joke 

Ken Klippensteinm, July 3, 2025

Last month, according to an internal memo, the Justice Department ordered its attorneys to “prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings” — the process by which naturalized Americans can be stripped of their citizenship — not for fraud or criminality, but “against individuals who pose a potential danger to national security.”


Strategic Political Economy

There’s a Race to Power the Future. China Is Pulling Away

[New York Times, via Naked Capitalism 07-02-2025]

Beijing is selling clean energy to the world, Washington is pushing oil and gas. Both are driven by national security….

While China still burns more coal than the rest of the world and emits more climate pollution than the United States and Europe combined, its pivot to cleaner alternatives is happening at breakneck speed. Not only does China already dominate global manufacturing of solar panels, wind turbines, batteries, E.V.s and many other clean energy industries, but with each passing month it is widening its technological lead….

China has also begun to dominate nuclear power, a highly technical field once indisputably led by the United States. China not only has 31 reactors under construction, nearly as many as the rest of the world combined, but has announced advances in next-generation nuclear technologies and also in fusion, the long-promised source of all-but-limitless clean energy that has bedeviled science for years.


Global power shift

BRICS Without China? Xi’s No-Show at Summit in Brazil Is No Coincidence 

[YouTube, via Naked Capitalism 07-05-2025]

[Yves Smith: “This video does not consider the thesis that another well-substantiated video argued: that Xi had not made a single appearance outside his residence after a sudden absence during a major party event. The thesis is he had a health crisis, which kicked off a power struggle, and he is now under house arrest. Even if this is false, BRICS is playing out as we predicted: all hat and no cattle (ex facilitating bilateral trade financial plumbing, which is very important). Even Mohammed Marandi, when Nima brought up BRICS in the past week, almost sighed when Nima mentioned BRICS and said what mattered was not BRICS but the idea of BRICS and organizations like the SCO which were advancing the BRICS philosophy. That correction said to me was Marandi signaling that BRICS has been overhyped and the focus needs to be on the paramount BRICS aim of multipolarity, and not the supposed organization, which as of today, does not even have a budget.”]


U.S. Attorney General calls Mexico a “foreign adversary”

[Guadalajara Post, June 27, 2025]


Gaza / Palestine / Israel / Iran

Quiet, West Bank Pogrom in Progress 

[Haaretz, via Naked Capitalism 07-02-2025]


Israeli army purchases frozen as drones worth millions lost in Iran

[Middle East Monitor, June 30, 2025]

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has suspended new military purchases amid concerns about a potential new round of fighting with Iran, following the loss of dozens of drones worth millions of dollars over Iranian territory.

According to Ynet, the Israeli Ministry of Finance is refusing to approve a 60-billion-shekel ($16.2 billion) increase requested by the Ministry of Defence to cover the costs of the recent conflict with Iran and the ongoing Operation Gideon’s Chariots in Gaza. Both operations were not part of the approved 2025 state budget….


Chilling Maps Show: Iran's Missiles Obliterated Israeli Neighborhoods

Bar Peleg, Ran Shimoni, Adi Hashmonai, Jun 30, 2025 [Haaretz]

From Tamra to Tel Aviv and further south, Israeli engineers' maps show how a shock wave from Iran's ballistic missiles can be as ruinous as a direct hit….

In Tel Aviv, 480 buildings have been damaged, many of them badly, at five separate sites. In Ramat Gan, it's 237 buildings at three sites, about 10 badly. In another Tel Aviv suburb, Bat Yam, 78 buildings were damaged by one hit; 22 will have to be razed.

The Israel Tax Authority has received applications for financial assistance for nearly 33,000 damaged structures. Another 4,450 files have been opened for the loss of belongings and equipment, and another 4,119 for damaged vehicles….

Peter Haenseler, 5 July 2025 [Sonar21]


Thomas Neuburger, July 01, 2025 [God’s Spies]


Chris Hedges, July 2, 2025
The latest report submitted by Francesca Albanese, Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, lists 48 corporations and institutions, including Palantir Technologies Inc., Lockheed Martin, Alphabet Inc., Amazon, International Business Machine Corporation (IBM), Caterpillar Inc., Microsoft Corporation and Massachusetts Institue of Technology (MIT), along with banks and financial firms such as Blackrock, insurers, real estate firms and charities, which in violation of international law are making billions from the occupation and the genocide of Palestinians.


Oligarchy
The Oligarchs’ Big Prize in Trump’s Budget-Busting Bill

Timothy Noah, July 3, 2025 [The New Republic]

Avoiding an income-tax increase is nice, but that’s not the bill’s greatest gift to the rich….

The oligarchs’ real prize in the reconciliation bill is the continuation or possible expansion of a 2017 change in the tax code so tedious to explain that most news accounts haven’t bothered. Some people call it the qualified business income deduction, others call it the pass-through deduction, and still others just call it Section 199A. It’s a deduction of 23 percent (House version) or 20 percent (Senate version) on business income that “passes through,” untaxed, to a private individual, who then pays taxes on it as personal rather than corporate income. The rationale for this deduction is that business income shouldn’t be taxed at a maximum 37 percent rate when the corporate income tax is only 21 percent.

Are you bored yet? If so, you’re exactly where the oligarchs want you. Maybe you’ll perk up if I tell you this tax cut will add to the budget deficit either $820 billion (House version) or $736 billion (Senate version). More than half the benefit will go to millionaires.

Pass-through income is a key driver of income inequality. Between 1985 and 2021, the top 1 percent in the income distribution increased its share of the nation’s income from 13 percent to more than 25 percent. The majority of that increase came from pass-through income. Defenders of the pass-through tax break will tell you that most pass-through businesses are small businesses, and that’s true. But the majority of income from pass-through businesses goes to the rich. In 2011, 70 percent of all pass-through income went to the top 1 percent; the 2017 tax break almost certainly pushed that proportion higher….


Chartbook 394 “A City we can afford”: capitalism and democracy in New York 

Adam Tooze [via Naked Capitalism 06-30-2025]

...The idea that democracy might enable the majority of Americans to proactively distribute significantly greater resources away from the rich towards public services and those most in need, has come to seem increasingly quaint. At this moment, Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill, a huge tax giveaway for the upper class, is moving through Congress. It will be profoundly regressive in its impact.

But within the frame of a city like New York, with a tightly packed population of 8.5 million, the distributional struggle takes on a rather different hue. In New York City the trade offs and conflicts feel real. The rich, the middle class and the poor cannot avoid each other, as they often do in the rest of the USA. Through shared infrastructure like schools or overcrowded and dangerous streets, the competition for scarce housing and the cost of everyday necessities, the struggle of competing purchasing power and class differentiation is played out in plain view. Meanwhile, the shocking state of the subway brings home viscerally the many failures of public policy. How can a city of such wealth be reliant on a system of such shabby, stinking decrepitude? It is not by accident that New York City’s upper class fear democracy more than their counterparts in much of the rest of the country. Here there might actually be a majority in favor or redistribution, major market regulation and against privatization. De facto, New York City’s taxing powers are limited. Mamdani is talking about a few percentage points for those earning more than a million dollars a year. Everything requires approval by Albany, the far more conservative state-capital, 140 miles to the North. But, to prevent these questions even being posed, the backlash against Mamdani will be intense and it will be very well funded.

That backlash will be led by big money from New York’s rich upper class. As the voting data suggest, his support dwindled fast amongst those with incomes more than $150,000. At the upper end, there are 28,000, or so, New Yorkers who filed income tax on adjusted gross income (AGI) of more than $1 million, accounted for 0.7% of all tax filers, 35.6% of the AGI, and 42.4% of NYC Personal Income Tax (PIT) liability. Roughly 4400 individuals declared more than $ 5 million or more. And 1600 made $10 million or more. That group, who amounted to 0.04% of the total returns in 2011-2021, accounted for 17.9% of the AGI, and 21.3% of NYC income tax paid. 123 people on the Forbes list of billionaires are registered as living in the city….


The war on America’s radicals: Mamdani is only the latest victim 

B. Duncan Moench, July 4, 2025 [Unherd, via Naked Capitalism 07-06-2025]

...Muslims and non-Western religions aren’t the only groups that have been met with prejudice by the country’s Anglo-Protestant majority either. Even the Mormons, arguably the whitest — and most Middle American — of heterodox religious groups had to abandon its practice of polygamy and dismantle their vast communal economic system before the Utah territory could be admitted as a state. Yes, Catholics, Jews, and Mormons were eventually welcomed into the American mainstream during the 20th century. But that only happened after a full century of cultural, and political, Anglo-centric assimilation. Each group had to prove they embraced Republican versions of democracy, Anglo-liberal “free” market economics and, no less important, Anglo-Americans’ unique take on the Protestant work ethic, which equates state support with personal failure….


In American political culture, however, the establishment has eagerly worshipped “wealth creators” while demeaning wage workers as lazy or entitled. This occurs regularly despite the fact that the US has, by far, the weakest labour protections and stingiest welfare state among wealthy industrialised nations. This mentality emerged early in the industrial era, as elites embraced a Robber Baron-style capitalist triumphalism, intertwined with the survival-of-the-fittest ethos promoted by Social Darwinists like William Graham Sumner. The only serious resistance ever mounted against this ideology was the New Deal coalition, built on Franklin Roosevelt’s political genius and relentless popular appeal. The American establishment hysterically condemn Mamdani because they can sense he might have that same potential.

Despite Roosevelt’s unparalleled four-term popularity, when the New Deal coalition collapsed in the Seventies, the role of labour unions and the state in building up middle-class stability began to disappear from the national narrative. In its place, identity politics rose up to become the face of American “Leftism”. As the language of identity replaced the language of class, the establishment’s long-standing worship of wealth and material success became stronger still. That ultimately paved the way for Wall Street plunder and modern Silicon Valley hyper-feudalism where, since 1975, approximately $79 trillion has been redistributed from the bottom 90% of American workers to the top 1%.

This astoundingly regressive wealth redistribution must, of course, be justified by ideology. That’s where the Social Darwinism of thinkers like Sumner come in, offering a uniquely American cauldron of disdain for the needy and indigent….

Despite the bemoaning of Mamdani as nothing more than a spoiled woke socialist, his surprising political success derives from his rejection of identity-victimhood fixations and — like FDR before him — his refusal to accept the elite dogma that the state is powerless to improve the economic conditions of everyday people.

Mamdani is routinely portrayed as a demonic immigrant antichrist for the same reason the German 48ers were declared an existential threat, despite their small numbers and political irrelevance. These early rebels openly challenged America’s LASP norms and dared to advocate for a different — multicultural and multi-ideological — vision of the country. Mamdani seems set to do the same. Whether or not you support his policies, the intensity of the reaction from the national media and Right-wing influencers toward a mayor’s race, in a place most of them openly hate, reveals something deeper, almost unconscious….


The Common Sense of a Wealth Tax: Thomas Paine & Taxation as Freedom from Aristocracy

Jeremy Bearer-FriendVanessa Williamson, 1 January 2022 [Scholarly Commons]


The carnage of mainstream neoliberal economics

Don’t blame China — Blame Milton Friedman

[X-Twitter, via Naked Capitalism 06-29-2025]

William Huo

Exhibit Q8: The Empire That Milton Built. Then Gutted.America is in decline. But this wasn’t caused by China, or Russia, or immigration, or wokeism. The culprit is Milton Friedman. And the class that turned his ideas into a wrecking ball. (1/17)

Friedman taught that the only social responsibility of business is to increase profits. From that seed grew a system that stripped America to its studs and sold the drywall to China. (2/17)
….
This wasn’t some invisible hand. It was conscious policy. The WTO, NAFTA, and permanent MFN status for China all served the same goal. Eliminate borders for capital. Trap labor in place. (6/17)


Surveillance pricing lets corporations decide what your dollar is worth

[Pluralistic, via The Big Picture July 03, 2025]

What if you show up at the hotel at 9pm and the hotelier can ask a credit bureau how much you can afford to pay for the room? What if they can find out that you’re in chemotherapy, so you don’t have the stamina to shop around for a cheaper room? What if they can tell that you have a 5AM flight and need to get to bed right now? 


That Dropped Call With Customer Service? It Was on Purpose 

Chris Colin, June 29, 2025 [The Atlantic]

Endless wait times and excessive procedural fuss—it’s all part of a tactic called “sludge.” ….

...On the contrary, I told her, I needed to hear every detail. Tentatively at first, she told me about a family trip to Sweden that had been scuttled by COVID. What followed was a protracted war involving denied airline refunds, unusable vouchers, expired vouchers, and more. Other guests from the party began drifting over. One recounted a recent Verizon nightmare. Another had endured Kafkaesque tech support from Sonos. The stories kept coming: gym-quitting labyrinths, Airbnb hijinks, illogical conversations with the permitting office, confounding interactions with the IRS. People spoke of not just the money lost but the hours, the sanity, the basic sense that sense can prevail.

Taken separately, these hassles and indignities were funny anecdotes. Together, they suggested something unreckoned with. And everyone agreed: It was all somehow getting worse. In 2023 (the most recent year for which data are available), the National Customer Rage Survey showed that American consumers were, well, full of rage. The percentage seeking revenge—revenge!—for their hassles had tripled in just three years….

When I started talking with people about their sludge stories, I noticed that almost all ended the same way—with a weary, bedraggled Fuck it. Beholding the sheer unaccountability of the system, they’d pay that erroneous medical bill or give up on contesting that ticket. And this isn’t happening just here and there. Instead, I came to see this as a permanent condition. We are living in the state of Fuck it.
Some of the sludge we submit to is unavoidable—the simple consequence of living in a big, digitized world.

But some of it is by design. ProPublica showed in 2023 how Cigna saved millions of dollars by rejecting claims without having doctors read them, knowing that a limited number of customers would endure the process of appeal. (Cigna told ProPublica that its description was “incorrect.”) Later that same year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ordered Toyota’s motor-financing arm to pay $60 million for alleged misdeeds that included thwarting refunds and deliberately setting up a dead-end hotline for canceling products and services. (The now-diminished bureau canceled the order in May.) As one Harvard Business Review article put it, “Some companies may actually find it profitable to create hassles for complaining customers.”


The Business of Betting on Catastrophe

[The MIT Press Reader, via The Big Picture June 30, 2025]

World Bank pandemic bonds paid out only after death tolls passed a threshold. They’re part of a booming market where investors turn calamity into capital. 


U.S. Imported Food Reliance Worsens: Food Trade Deficit Alert! 

[Rethink Trade, via Naked Capitalism 07-04-2025]

Key findings:

  • The United States’ food trade deficit reached $58.7 billion in 2024. The $46 billion increase in the gap since 2015 is driven by a $42.7 billion increase in imports.
  • The United States has been in a food trade deficit since 2015 and an agricultural trade deficit—which includes fiber, forestry, and industrial products—since 2017.
  • Several goods commonly found on the Fourth of July barbecue table have trade deficits, including beef, potatoes, tomatoes, watermelon, ketchup, and beer.
  • The majority of the grain and oilseed milling products, fruits and tree nuts, and seafood consumed in the United States are imports. The import share of consumption for many foods, both manufactured and non-manufactured, is increasing.
  • The U.S. food trade deficit likely cannot be addressed by increasing exports. Despite food exports to top trade partners and in top export categories increasing, the deficit continues to widen on growing imports.


Trumpillnomics

Republicans Are Cutting Medicare. Not Only Medicaid, Medicare. 

David Dayen, July 3, 2025 [The American Prospect]

... Republicans have created another problem. They didn’t just cut Medicaid; they also have forced nearly half a trillion dollars in cuts to Medicare, the health program for the elderly.

Because of a statutory requirement to automatically impose budget cuts when legislation increases the deficit, the Big Beautiful Bill would require automatic sequestration cuts across the board, something that has been confirmed by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) but has been largely absent from the debate over the bill. Medicare is one of the programs that will face the axe, and the damage sums to $490 billion over the next ten years, starting in the next fiscal year that begins in October. While many of the safety-net cuts in the bill are delayed to help Republicans with their re-election campaigns, the Medicare cuts must begin next year….



A List of Nearly Everything in the G.O.P. Bill, and How Much It Would Cost or Save

Alicia Parlapiano, Margot Sanger-Katz, Aatish Bhatia and Josh Katz [New York Times]

Below is a table that lists how nearly every provision would affect the federal budget over 10 years, as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office in an analysis published Sunday. The budget office measured the legislation as it usually does, taking into account the cost of extending expiring tax cuts. This is a different approach than the one embraced by the Senate’s leaders. The C.B.O. analysis does not include a handful of policy provisions that do not have direct effects on the federal deficit.



Trump Gets To Sign His Big Ugly Bill Today Because... CONGRESS ALWAYS CHICKENS OUT

Howie Klein, July 04, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]

Trump, reports some of the Republicans who met with him in the last few days, doesn’t even know what’s in the bill. According to 3 of the congress members, the increasingly senile SeƱor TACO told them at one of the meetings that there are 3 things Congress shouldn’t touch if they want to win elections: Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security. One member said to Trump that “But we’re touching Medicaid in this bill.”


Heather Cox Richardson, ​​​​​​​June 28, 2025 [Letters from an American]

In Politico today, Meredith Lee Hill reported that “[e]very major health system in Louisiana is warning [House] Speaker Mike Johnson [R-LA] and the rest of the state’s congressional delegation that the Senate [Republicans’] planned Medicaid cuts ‘would be historic in their devastation.’” The Senate’s revised measure will hurt healthcare and undermine the state’s budget, they wrote. But “[t]hese economic consequences pale in comparison to the harm that will be caused to residents across the state, regardless of insurance status, who will no longer be able to get the care that they need.”


Trump and the GOP Will Regret the Day They Passed This Sick Bill

Michael Tomasky, July 3, 2025 [The New Republic]

Here’s the important question to ponder: Why is this happening? What kind of people want to close rural hospitals? What kind of people want veterans to stop being able to buy decent groceries? Answering these questions teaches us a lot about what’s become of the Republican Party over the last three-plus decades.

The seminal moment in this history isn’t Trump coming down that escalator. In fact, it has nothing to do with Trump.

The year was 1990. At an impromptu meeting at Andrews Air Force Base with congressional leaders, President George H.W. Bush agreed to the last tax increase that a critical mass of Republicans backed. The tax increase was responsible fiscal policy— the deficit had jumped significantly since 1989—and in fact the revenue, and other spending caps in the bill, helped stabilize the country’s finances. But all anyone remembers is that Bush broke his “read my lips” campaign pledge not to raise taxes.

Ever since, Republican domestic policy has consisted entirely of two prongs: cutting taxes, overwhelmingly for the rich; cutting spending, overwhelmingly for, or one should say “on,” working-class and poor people. This is who they are.

Within that broad category, there are three camps….


Construction spending continues contraction, amplifying yellow flag caution from manufacturing 

[Angry Bear, via Naked Capitalism 07-02-2025]


They’re not capitalists — they’re predatory criminals

GOP is stripping healthcare from millions knowing it will kill them--they should be charged with murder!

Dean Obeidallah, June 30, 2025

The GOP is about to approve the “the biggest rollback in federal support for health care ever,” as Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF told The Washington Post. More than 12 million people (up to 16 million) will lose healthcare due to GOP’s cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act to fund a tax cut for their wealthy donors.

Stripping Americans of healthcare will kill people. Literally.

The GOP knows this but doesn’t care. The only question is: Does their actions rise to the level of manslaughter or even murder?!


What’s the cruelty to do this, to take health insurance away from people?
Heather Cox Richardson, June 30, 2025 [Letters from an American]

...Senator King continued: “I don’t understand the obsession and I never have…with taking health insurance away from people. I don’t get it. Trying to take away the Affordable Care Act in 2017 or 2018 and now this. What’s driving this? What’s the cruelty to do this, to take health insurance away from people knowing that it’s going to cost them…up to and including…their lives.”

In fact, the drive to slash health insurance is part of the Republicans’ determination to destroy the modern government.

Grover Norquist, an employee of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and one of the key architects of the Republican argument that the solution to societal ills is tax cuts, in 2010 described to Rebecca Elliott of the Harvard Crimson how he sees the role of government. “Government should enforce [the] rule of law,” he said. “It should enforce contracts, it should protect people bodily from being attacked by criminals. And when the government does those things, it is facilitating liberty. When it goes beyond those things, it becomes destructive to both human happiness and human liberty.”

Norquist vehemently opposed taxation, saying that “it’s not any of the government’s business who earns what, as long as they earn it legitimately,” and proposed cutting government spending down to 8% of gross domestic product, or GDP, the value of the final goods and services produced in the United States.

The last time the level of government spending was at that 8% of GDP was 1933, before the New Deal. In that year, after years of extraordinary corporate profits, the banking system had collapsed, the unemployment rate was nearly 25%, prices and productivity were plummeting, wages were cratering, factories had shut down, farmers were losing their land to foreclosure. Children worked in the fields and factories, elderly and disabled people ate from garbage cans, unregulated banks gambled away people’s money, and business owners treated their workers as they wished. Within a year the Great Plains would be blowing away as extensive deep plowing had damaged the land, making it vulnerable to drought. Republican leaders insisted the primary solution to the crisis was individual enterprise and private charity.


They Will Not Kill Us Without A Fight — 38 moral witnesses were arrested today for refusing to accept policy murder

William J. Barber, II and Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, June 30, 2025 [Our Moral Moment]


Michigan Republican Mike Rogers Sells Out To The Same Crypto-Cartel He Once Warned Us About

Howie Klein, July 03, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]

...It’s hard to overstate the danger of what’s unfolding here. The “crypto cartel” isn’t just a convenient phrase; it’s a rapidly metastasizing force in American politics, a moneyed clique of deregulation-obsessed financiers, libertarian tech bros, and shadowy offshore interests who are buying influence across party lines, whether Slotkin, Gallego, Kirsten Gillibrand, Adam Schiff, Shontel Brown, Ritchie Torres, Josh Gottheimer, Angie Craig, Donald Davis, Maxwell Frost… on Team Blue or Lummis, Tom Emmer, Ted Budd, Katie Britt, Jim Banks, Young Kim, David Valadao, Byron Donalds, Randy Fine on Team Red. Many of them have no foundational ideology beyond profit, no loyalty beyond their wallets and no concern for the democratic process—unless it can be bent, hacked or just plain purchased outright….


Dave DeCamp, June 29, 202 [DefendDemocracy.Press]


Restoring balance to the economy

Green Social Housing: Lessons from Vienna

[Climate and Community Institute, June 2025]

Vienna is the global capital of social housing. Over 40 percent of the city’s housing units are social housing, providing homes for the majority of the city’s renters. And, as the city’s population has grown over the past two decades, Vienna has continued to build affordable, beautiful social housing, where doctors live next to janitors and grandparents live down the street from their grandkids. Today, Vienna’s social housing shelters residents from both real estate speculation and climate breakdown.


Ezra Klein Meets Zohran Mamdani

Robert Kuttner, July 3, 2025 [The American Prospect]

...Klein has the germ of a valid argument, but he has been widely criticized, including in these pages, for ignoring the broader issue of corporate power in determining what government actually does. For example, the collapse of housing construction after 2008 was not the result of a sudden increase in zoning obstacles. It was the result of Wall Street’s subprime scam.

U.S. GDP per capita is a robust $89,000. That’s almost $360,000 for a family of four—if it were distributed equally. But of course, the economy becomes more unequal every year. On average, there is plenty of abundance. The problem is maldistribution, financialization, and oligarchy….

Klein has scoffed at Mamdani’s idea of publicly owned supermarkets in food deserts, pointing out that supermarket chains operate on very low margins. But Klein misses the fact that Mamdani is proposing grocery pilots in places where the chains don’t find it profitable to operate at all. Several small towns in red-state America that have lost chain stores already have municipally owned food markets.

Klein also misses the fact that high retail food prices are substantially the result not of excessive markups by chains, but extreme consolidation and price-gouging by producers, for which the remedy is antitrust. In addition, if smaller stores could get the same pricing from food wholesalers as the big-box chains—something that is required by law under the Robinson-Patman Act—they could compete in these food deserts. A city-owned grocery in New York would have the resources to bring Robinson-Patman cases and create a level playing field.


Disrupting mainstream economics

This July 4, Where is America’s Land of Opportunity?

Colin Woodard, July 4, 2025 [Washington Monthly]

The geographies of upward mobility show U.S. regions that emphasize investments in the common good over economic libertarianism do better


Why the Federal Reserve doesn't understand the monetary system that it's supposed to manage [video]

Steve Keen, June 30, 2025 [Building a New Economics]


Information age dystopia / surveillance state

Ex-CISA Official Warns: We’ve Gutted Cybersecurity—A Gift to Iran, China and Russia

Lynn Parramore, June 30, 2025 [Institute for New Economic Thinking]


Interview by Lynn Parramore featuring Dr. David Mussington, cybersecurity expert with two decades of experience [including with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)], reveals why the clock is ticking on U.S.  vulnerabilities under Trump.




Landmark AI ruling is a blow to authors and artists

[Popular Information, via The Big Picture June 29, 2025]

Books are particularly valuable for LLMs precisely because humans have taken such care to produce them. If you want to teach a computer the nuances of many different topics — and how to write clearly — there is no substitute for books. But when it came time to train Claude, Anthropic did not start by buying books. Instead, it “downloaded for free millions of copyrighted books in digital form from pirate sites on the internet,” including books by the three authors who filed the lawsuit. 


The End of Publishing as We Know It

[The Atlantic, via The Big Picture June 29, 2025]

...Chatbots have proved adept at keeping users locked into conversations. They do so by answering every question, often through summarizing articles from news publishers. Suddenly, fewer people are traveling outside the generative-AI sites—a development that poses an existential threat to the media, and to the livelihood of journalists everywhere.

According to one comprehensive study, Google’s AI Overviews—a feature that summarizes web pages above the site’s usual search results—has already reduced traffic to outside websites by more than 34 percent. The CEO of DotDash Meredith, which publishes PeopleBetter Homes & Gardens, and Food & Wine, recently said the company is preparing for a possible “Google Zero” scenario….

Book publishers, especially those of nonfiction and textbooks, also told me they anticipate a massive decrease in sales, as chatbots can both summarize their books and give detailed explanations of their contents. Publishers have tried to fight back, but my conversations revealed how much the deck is stacked against them. The world is changing fast, perhaps irrevocably. The institutions that comprise our country’s free press are fighting for their survival…. 


The Ascendance Of Algorithmic Tyranny 

[Nomea, via Naked Capitalism 07-02-2025]


A.I. Is Starting to Wear Down Democracy

[New York Times, via The Big Picture June 29, 2025]

Content generated by artificial intelligence has become a factor in elections around the world. Most of it is bad, misleading voters and discrediting the democratic process. Artificial intelligence has long threatened to transform elections around the world. Now there is evidence from at least 50 countries that it already has. 


Make Fun Of Them 

Ed Zitron [via Naked Capitalism 07-01-2025]


Has an AI Backlash Begun? 

[Wired, via Naked Capitalism 07-01-2025]


Markets, Bureaucracy, Democracy, ... AI? What large models share with the systems that make society run

Henry Farrell, Jun 30, 2025


Botshit Gone Wild 

Gary Marcus, via Naked Capitalism 07-05-2025]


Climate and environmental crises

The electrification imperative — How a switch from burning fossil fuels to using electricity can unlock the full value of the energy transition

[Ember Energy, via Naked Capitalism 06-30-2025]


Earth is Trapping Much More Heat Than Climate Models Forecast 

[The Conversation, via Naked Capitalism 07-01-2025]


Arctic Sea Ice reaches a Historic Low for late June, with Winter Impacts expected if the Weather Pattern persists 

[Severe Weather, via Naked Capitalism 07-01-2025]


Droughts worldwide pushing tens of millions towards starvation, says report 

[Guardian, via Naked Capitalism 07-05-2025]


Democrats' political malpractice

Will Democrats Learn from the Establishment’s Loss? The David Hogg affair, Zohran Mamdani’s win, and the future of the Democratic coalition.

David Austin Walsh, June 26, 2025 [Boston Review]

...Part of the problem for Democrats is that there is little consensus about what exactly the party stands for in concrete policy terms beyond unconditional support for Israel, some attention to climate change, and vaguely defined commitments to racial, gender, and sexuality equity (never mind the establishment’s backing of Cuomo after his resignation following sexual harassment allegations)….

Another key factor behind the implosion of the Democratic establishment is that it once again proved incapable of accommodating major internal reform. Twenty-five-year-old liberal activist David Hogg, elected as one of five vice-chairs of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in February, said he would not run again after a vote to hold new vice-chair elections passed with an overwhelming majority earlier this month on nominally procedural grounds….

...Democrats have long struggled with a gerontocracy problem: even with the recent elevation of younger leaders like Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries—fifty-four years old—the average age of Democratic leadership in the House remains seventy-two. (The average for GOP leadership, by contrast, is forty-eight.) ….

what philosopher OlĆŗfįŗ¹́mi TƔƭwò has called “deference politics.” 

Elite deference politics breeds elite political entitlement, often defended by explicit appeals to identity. This was a strong part of the rationale for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential bid—it was Clinton’s turn after Obama to be president, the line went—and it animated the fury of so many Clinton stalwarts at Sanders’s candidacy. The left’s antipathy for Clinton was dismissed first as the misogyny of the so-called “Bernie Bros” and then as racism, a refusal to listen to Black voters in the primaries. Later, in 2020, concerns about Biden’s age and fitness for the presidency were brushed aside—even by people who raised similar concerns about Sanders—again on the grounds of ageism. The point is that centrist bloviating about “The Groups” misses the most consequential case of elite deference politics. The form practiced by the party establishment itself is vastly more responsible for the party’s plight in 2025 than environmental and racial justice nonprofits….


The Elephant in the Room — Reintermediation is the only path forward for Democrats

[Policy Tensor, via Naked Capitalism 07-01-2025]

...Start with the abundance agenda. Its focus is on improving government’s capacity to solve problems (like building more housing or infrastructure faster). That’s undeniably important – effective governance is a public good. However, ask: Who is advocating the abundance agenda, and to whom is it being pitched? Largely, it’s an elite discourse (journalists, think-tankers, some politicians) trying to convince other politically attentive elites that we should loosen regulations and invest in growth. The people most alienated from the Democratic Party – say, a non-college homeowner in a deindustrialized Midwestern town – are not part of this conversation, except perhaps as skeptical onlookers. In fact, some of those voters might hear “deregulate zoning and environmental rules” and think: that sounds like helping developers, not me. The messaging of abundance could easily be co-opted by the GOP (“Democrats want to sidestep environmental protections to ram through solar farms and apartments in your suburban neighborhood”). Without an underlying trust and relationship with communities, a pro-growth agenda might breed backlash rather than enthusiasm….

Ultimately, all three strategies operate within the existing paradigm of a mostly top-down party trying to persuade voters periodically. They tweak what the party says or does from the top, but not how the party connects with people at the ground level. None of them directly tackles the party’s structural legitimacy problem. Indeed, it’s telling that these debates are largely internal to elite circles – evidence of the very gap we’ve highlighted. As Waleed Shahid observed, Democrats have become “trapped in an increasingly bitter internal fight” between camps (populists vs. abundance advocates) instead of uniting to face outward challenges. And that fight is not purely ideological; it’s powered by insider interests (big donors and party operatives) who find the “abundance” framework a convenient way to dismiss the populist left’s critiques of corporate power….

[TW: does not address the issue of how political economy was reorganized over the past half century to favor capital at the expense of labor. The real elephant in the room is that with the Supreme Court having decriminalized corruption (see The Lever's podcast series The Master Plan), political elites are bought to do what the rich want.

[What must be restored is the historical understanding that the rich have always posed a threat to republican self-government because of their insatiable desire for more wealth and more power. As some scholars of the founding period have observed, one of the great tragedies of USA history is the supplanting of civic republicanism by economic liberalism.  No one should be elevated to public office who do not see the rich as competitors for power, to be kept under control. Thomas Paine argued for a wealth tax as a means of ensuring freedom from oligarchy.]

  

On Zohran Mamdani and Taxi Drivers 

Zephyr Teachout [via Naked Capitalism 07-03-2025]


Unable to Reinvent Itself, Dems Can’t Capitalize on Trump’s Missteps.

Jon Jeter’s Black Agenda Report

“The DNC,” he wrote, “owes its stasis to the internecine feud that came to a head with Kamala Harris’ loss to Trump in last year’s general election and which spilled over into the New Year. That split pits party stalwarts against younger progressives who want Democrats to break from the conservative tradition established by Bill Clinton in his 1992 presidential campaign in a misguided effort to ‘out-Republican the Republicans.’”

The party’s disunion is the culmination of  Bill Clinton’s strategy to compete with Ronald Reagan’s GOP for the votes of white, suburban racists by effectively being more conservative. Covering the tune, “Anything You Can Do I Can Do Better,” Clinton razed the Wall Street regulations that Reagan only loosened. When Reagan left the White House, the number of conglomerates controlling the bulk of U.S. media outlets had been whittled from 50 to 29; by the time Clinton left office, the number was six. And while Reagan talked a good game about lifting trade barriers, the U.S. tariff regime was largely intact when he left office; the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) signed into law by Clinton opened the floodgates for employers to ship the nation’s manufacturing sector offshore.

It was, however, Clinton’s 1994 crime bill that was the focus of intense scrutiny in the 2020 U.S. presidential season, and rightly so. The Reagan and Bush administrations nearly doubled the nation’s federal prison population yet Clinton jailed more inmates in eight years than the Reagan and Bush administrations did in 12.


The Democratic Party is Its Voters And They’re Doing Just Fine
­Josh Marshall, June 30, 2025 [Talking Points Memo]

As it happens, I hadn’t known this primary was being held last weekend. (No excuses, just so much else going on and it was run as a so-called “firehouse primary” on an expedited basis.) The first I heard about it was from a handful of TPM Readers who wrote in to tell me about the surprising levels of energy and turnout they’d seen when they showed up to vote. This contrast caught my attention because it’s one that keeps showing up, paradoxically unremarked upon in almost all the election coverage we see.

On the one hand, the Democratic Party is “floundering,” “directionless,” “lost.” It’s approval numbers are bleak. And then, often in the same articles, you have all this evidence of voter intensity. Turnout. New activism. Lots of new people running for office. What seems like an apparent contradiction resolves itself if you get your terms right. I don’t think the Democratic Party is in a tailspin or floundering at all. In many cases, the elected leadership of the party is. But the elected leadership is not the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party is its voters. Especially it’s primary voters….


Trump’s transactional regime

Trump’s Finances Were Shaky. Then He Began to Capitalize on His Comeback.

Russ Buettner, July 2, 2025 [New York Times]

Contrary to the president’s assertions, records filed in a fraud case against him suggest that his riches were not the product of a steady and strong empire.

Last spring, even as Donald J. Trump’s march back toward the White House dominated public attention, his finances, largely out of view, faced serious threats.
His office building in Lower Manhattan generated too little cash to cover its mortgage, with the balance coming due. Many of his golf courses regularly lacked enough players to cover costs. The flow of millions of dollars a year from his stint as a television celebrity had mostly dried up.
And a sudden wave of legal judgments threatened to devour all his cash.
Then, with his clinching of the Republican nomination, everything began to change….
Most glaringly, Mr. Trump is now both a partner in several crypto ventures and, as president, crypto’s chief policy regulator, and he has signaled that he wants his administration to have a hands-off approach to digital currencies.
Today, those moves are seen by Mr. Trump’s detractors as a money grab of historic proportions. But an analysis by The New York Times of thousands of pages of internal Trump Organization documents filed in one of the legal actions against him suggests a more urgent motivation for Mr. Trump’s behavior: a need, rather than simply a desire, for easy money to keep his empire intact….

Resistance

Trained Volunteers Patrol L.A. Streets as ICE Raids Intensify: Neighborhood groups monitor immigration enforcement amid rising fear and federal scrutiny.

Myriam-Fernanda Alcala Delgado July 3, 2025 [The American Prospect]


The Most Overlooked Value of Political Protest: Protests show people they are not alone in caring about an issue.

Betsy Levy Paluck, July 1, 2025 [The Atlantic]


Conservative / Libertarian / (anti)Republican Drive to Civil War

The Know Nothings Never Left— They Just Rebranded as MAGA… The Klansmen In Khakis

Howie Klein, July 03, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]


Mica Soellner reported that racists and xenophobes like Chip Roy (R-TX), Brandon Gill (R-TX) and Gym Jordan (R-OH) are on the warpath. “In the wake of Zohran Mamdani’s stunning win in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary, Hill Republicans are pondering a new issue— restricting legal immigration. Several conservatives have used Mamdani’s primary victory to argue that mass immigration is causing damaging cultural change, pointing to the 33-year-old’s political rise as an example. Mamdani, a Democratic socialist, was born in Uganda. Mamdani would become the first Muslim and Indian mayor of New York City if he wins the general election in November. ‘We have fifty-one-and-a-half million foreign born people in this country,’ Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) told us. ‘You clamp down on illegal immigration, which is what the president is doing, but you need to limit, slash and refocus legal immigration… legal immigration is part of the problem.’”


“Bipartisanship” Should Be An Epithet

Patrick Toomey, July 05, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]

...The GOP, as a party, gleefully threw dirt on the graves of the New Deal, the Fair Deal, and the Great Society. It wasn’t the handiwork of 1 overfed, oversexed, and undereducated front man. It was fathered and nurtured by party stalwarts like Grover Norquist and Mitch McConnell.

Cutting social spending for the poor and middle class, cutting taxes for the top 1%, and running up huge deficits in the process have been essential elements of the GOP playbook since halcyon days of St. Ron the Forgetful. Let’s remember what then-OMB Director David Stockman said of the 1981 Reagan-era upper-bracket tax cutting orgy. Do you realize the greed that came to the forefront? The hogs were really feeding. The greed level, the level of opportunism, just got out of control. 

Stockman summarized the GOP template for 45 years and counting now….


Howie Klein, July 01, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]


Gregory S. Schneider, June 30, 2025 [Washington Post]
What started as an effort to promote racial unity in Edenton by reconsidering its most prominent downtown symbol has done the opposite….

The tone from the White House gives an extra sense of empowerment to those who have come out to defend the Edenton monument every weekend for the past three years. On a recent sunny Saturday, Ron Toppin, 80, and two helpers set up a canopy over tables neatly lined with trays of Confederate information sheets and hit the sidewalk two hours before their opponents arrived.

Trump’s election “made the country a whole lot better,” said Toppin, whose late wife used to organize the informational materials for the group and who said his great-great-grandfather was a rebel soldier captured by the Union in 1863. “We’ve got America back.”

Mike Dean, commander of the Edenton Bell Battery of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, roared up on his Harley — dubbed “Traveller” after Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee’s horse — and took command of the outpost. When a few protesters began marching up the sidewalk, Dean gestured to a woman walking by with a sign that read “Remove this statue.”
“Understand,” Dean said, “these are Marxists. Marxists want to destroy history.”

John Ganz, July 1, 2025 [Unpopular Front]

The essence of Trump’s movement is an attack on the very concept of American citizenship. It’s the bright, red thread that runs through the entirety of its existence: from its origin in birtherism, the racist idea that there was something questionable or tainted about Barack Obama’s citizenship, to the stolen election myth, which sought to disenfranchise millions of Americans, to the attempt to end birthright citizenship by fiat through executive order, and the newly announced prioritization of denaturalization cases by the Department of Justice. A Republican congressman called for New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani’s denaturalization and deportation. The White House said it should be “investigated.” This is not to be taken lightly.

I say it is an attack on the concept of citizenship, not a redefinition or even a return to the pre-Reconstruction racial state, because, in the Trumpian universe, there is no agreed-upon, apolitical definition of who is granted citizenship, of who bears inalienable rights under the law. The sovereign decides who is a citizen, as it decides who is an enemy and where and when the law applies. It becomes entirely arbitrary, a prerogative grant….

It’s long been my contention that the attack on citizenship is the most serious and frightful aspect of the Trump phenomenon and the one that makes it most deserving of the epithet fascist or totalitarian. “MAGA,” in its innermost being, means “death to America.” If they successfully destroy American citizenship as enshrined in the Constitution they will have destroyed the country… It will be a chaotic and shambolic existence where more and more people have to scramble to ensure they have the right papers or are in the right zone.  



The (anti)Federalist Society assault on the Constitution

The Democracy Index

Joshua Kolb, Lily Conway, and Joyce Vance, July 1, 2025

Last week ended with the legal fireworks lawyers wait for every year: the bundle of Supreme Court decisions released at the end of June before the justices take their summer break. A total of nine opinions were released on Thursday and Friday, and while all the rulings were significant, there were four particularly notable decisions that will have significant nationwide repercussions and tell us where the court (and therefore the country) is headed.

​​​​​​​

The Necessity of Birthright Citizenship for Black People 

Margaret Kimberley, Ju[y 2, 2025 [Black Agenda Report]

"I'm just saying if we had the legal right to do it, I would do it in a heartbeat. I don't know if we do or not, we're looking at that right now." - Donald Trump on sending U.S. citizens convicted of crimes out of the country….

...The 14th Amendment did undo the 1857 Dred Scott decision, which deprived all Black people of citizenship. But Black people must always be wary and think ahead, as our enemies may be doing. Once any changes to the understanding of birthright citizenship are made, there is a possibility of persons, particularly from marginalized groups, becoming stateless. There are people who don’t have ready access to birth certificates, or in the case of a Black woman in Texas who has a birth certificate listing her name only as “Girl” and who, as a result, cannot obtain a Social Security card or prove her citizenship. No one knows how many other people find themselves in such situations….


Sunday, June 29, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – June 29, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – June 29, 2025

by Tony Wikrent


Remembering Bill Moyers: A Colossus of Journalism and Public Service

Jonathan Alter, June 28, 2025 [Washington Monthly]


'We Have Lost a Giant': Broadcast Legend Bill Moyers Dies at 91

Jessica Corbett, June 26, 2025 [CommonDreams]    


Free Press Mourns Bill Moyers

[Free Press, June 26 2025, via CommonDreams]


The (anti)Federalist Society assault on the Constitution

Amy Coney Barrett and the Supreme Court Give Birth to a Disaster

Garrett Epps, June 27, 2025 [Washington Monthly]

...Three federal district courts concluded that the birthright citizenship order is almost certainly unconstitutional and barred the executive branch from enforcing it pending a final decision. The issue seemed headed to the Supreme Court, where it would be decided in the normal course of American law.

The administration, however, did an end run around that process. It filed an application with the Supreme Court that denied any interest in the issue of the order’s constitutionality. Instead, it said, it wanted the Court to look at whether district courts can tell the president he can’t do something he wants to do—to issue “universal injunctions” barring the government from, for example, stripping citizenship from any baby until the constitutionality of the order can be settled. The two things, the government suggested, have nothing to do with each other….  


The Supreme Court Just Gave Trump Three Victories in One Ruling

Matt Ford, June 27, 2025 [The New Republic]

The Supreme Court’s ruling on Friday in Trump v. CASA is a disastrous moment for the American constitutional order. In a 6–3 decision, the court’s conservative justices curbed the judiciary’s power to prevent the executive branch from carrying out blatantly unconstitutional policies and orders.

The court effectively granted Trump three major victories in one stroke. First, the ruling severely narrowed federal judges’ power to temporarily halt the Trump administration’s actions in general, freeing the president from a major constraint on his policy agenda.

In response to lawsuits, lower courts had often issued what are known as “nationwide injunctions,” which blocked the executive branch from enacting a new policy while litigation continued in court. Those injunctions typically applied beyond the plaintiffs in a particular case. But Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the court, held that courts had acted unlawfully by granting relief to anyone beyond the plaintiffs themselves….


The Real Judicial Coup: How the Supreme Court Just Redefined Presidential Authority

Mike Brock, June 27, 2025 [Notes From The Circus]

...Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, has created what amounts to a doctrine of presumptive executive constitutionality. The Court ruled that when a president issues an order that appears to violate the Constitution, courts must assume the president is correct until proven wrong—not once, but individually, circuit by circuit, plaintiff by plaintiff.

Let’s be absolutely clear about what this means: the Supreme Court has ruled that birthright citizenship—guaranteed by the plain text of the 14th Amendment—can be suspended nationwide based solely on a president’s claim of authority, and anyone who wants their constitutional rights restored must file individual lawsuits seeking individual relief.

This isn’t judicial restraint. This is a fundamental rewriting of how constitutional rights work in America….

This represents a systematic advantage for executive power over constitutional constraint through procedural manipulation. It’s not that rights disappear—it’s that protecting them becomes exponentially more difficult and expensive….


“No Right Is Safe”: SCOTUS Bars Judges From Reining in Trump

Shawn Musgrave, June 27 2025 [The Intercept]

The Supreme Court halted courts from issuing national injunctions, forcing “judges to shrug and turn their backs to intermittent lawlessness.”


By Limiting Nationwide Injunctions, Supreme Court Declares 'Open Season on All Our Rights'

Jessica Corbett, June 27, 2025 [CommonDreams]

In a ruling that stems from the president's birthright citizenship order, the "conservative supermajority just took away lower courts' single most powerful tool for reining in the Trump administration's lawless excesses."


It’s Not Just a Constitutional Crisis in the Trump Era. It’s Constitutional Failure

Jack Rakove, June 27, 2025

[TW: Rakove is a leading scholar of the creation of the American republic. His 1996 book Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution dismantled many of the claims of the Constitutional originalism of conservatives, and was awarded the 1997 Pulitzer Prize for History.]

...Our ongoing constitutional crisis began with the presidential election last November 5. Reelecting an individual culpable for January 6 who has twice made a mockery of the presidential oath of office is itself a constitutional crisis. Nothing in his past or current behavior suggests that Trump has ever felt fidelity to his constitutional duties.

Once a constitutional crisis becomes an endemic condition, the term no longer usefully describes our collapsing system. Instead, we live in an era of constitutional failure when the relevant institutions cannot fulfill their responsibilities….

...When audiences at constituent meetings repeatedly shout, “Do your jobs,” they have a better grasp of Congress’s responsibility than their feckless representatives….

In the face of this congressional passivity, what path of constitutional repair is left open? Unsurprisingly, the best answer remains the courts. Although it has taken time to respond to the turmoil Trump has unleashed, the judiciary’s actions have been encouraging. Remarkably, the difference between Republican and Democratic-appointed judges has been slight, suggesting that judicial independence enshrined in Article III may be fulfilled amid this grave situation.

Yet, with the current Supreme Court, one cannot be too confident. Why? Its responses to the two 2024 critical election cases remain deeply troubling to anyone who takes the injunctions of the Constitution seriously.  The Court handled one case with striking expedition. But it manifestly stalled the other with a run-out-the-clock set of procedural delays that deprived voters of findings they were entitled to possess before November 5. The decisions in Trump v. Anderson (which involved the application of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to Trump’s eligibility to appear on the Colorado primary ballot) and Trump v. U.S. (the presidential immunity case) should sit atop any hit list of constitutional failures….

...The second condition seems more surprising. It is the stunning inadequacy of the majority’s understanding of constitutional history and core concepts of American constitutionalism….

In our fractious polity, fresh insults to constitutional norms and settled practices of governance occur daily. That is why the phrase constitutional crisis no longer describes our situation. The Constitution has failed, and we no longer know which institution will rescue it.


Sotomayor joined by Jackson, Kagan on fiery birthright citizenship dissent 

[The Hill, via Naked Capitalism 06-28-2025]


Trump not violating any law

'He who saves his Country does not violate any Law'


Trump Stuns By Saying ‘I Don’t Know’ When Asked Directly NBC’s Kristen Welker ‘Don’t You Need to Uphold the Constitution?’

Joe DePaolo, May 4th, 2025 [mediaite.com]


Trump’s ICE Agents Are Arresting US Citizens. GOP Budget Would Hire 10,000 More. 

[Truthout, via Naked Capitalism 06-24-2025]


Trump's secret police are terrorizing American streets: The altercations are growing more tense — especially in Los Angeles.

Justin Glawe, June 27, 2025 [Public Notice]


Militarized LA: troops here to stay as Trump doubles down on deployments 

[The Guardian, via Naked Capitalism 06-24-2025]


Justice Dept. whistleblower details senior officials’ efforts to stonewall judges, ignore decisions 

[CBS News, via Naked Capitalism 06-26-2025]


How To Talk To Your Senators About Emil Bove

Joyce Vance, June 25, 2025 [Civil Discourse]


Meet the D.C. Bigwigs Literally Profiting Off Trump’s Deportations 

[The Bulwark, via Naked Capitalism 06-26-2025]


Strategic Political Economy

Solving America’s Chip Manufacturing Crisis

Kenneth Flamm and William B. Bonvillian

American Affairs Volume IX, Number 2 (Summer 2025): 41–68.

[TW: Flamm documented the origins of the U.S. computer industry in his 1998 book, Creating the Computer: government, industry, and high technology, published by the Brookings Institution and available in full online. This book should be required reading for all courses of study in economics and American history because it devastates the myth of “entrepreneurial free enterprise” by showing how it was carefully created and targeted U.S. government programs and funding which allowed the risky new technologies required for computers to reach commercial success and create an entire, new industry. This new article is long and brimming with technical industrial information very few people have mastered, making it an extremely important and informative read. ]

...Economies of scale are the fundamental economic force reshaping industrial structure in leading-edge chip fabrication. For context, note that at the peak of its market power in the global computer processor (CPU) market in the third quarter of 2014, Intel alone produced a record 100 million x86 processors (x86 is Intel’s famous foundational architecture and instruction set for computer processors), implying an annual Intel production rate of somewhere between 300 and 400 million processors….

Intel’s current problems are in part linked to the relentless increase in fabrication equipment costs at every new technology node as well as to the increasing volume of production needed to reach minimum efficient scale at the new nodes. In 2014, Intel’s dominant market position gave it massive volume that was produced at multiple Intel fabs (using the “copy exactly” strategy Intel invented in the 1980s). But by 2023, Intel’s annual x86 processor volumes appear to have dropped 30–50 percent, to 190–230 million sold annually….

...in the early 2000s, Intel began to stray from the vision of its legendary early leaders Robert Noyce, Gordon Moore, and Andy Grove, who focused on fielding the most technically advanced, complex, and capable products on the market.… The connection to Intel’s current woes is that the first decade of the twenty-first century was a distracting one for Intel management. The firm’s resources and managerial attention were diverted into sales and marketing initiatives aimed at defending an entrenched position of market power. The company had lost its singular focus on technical innovation that had been its hallmark under Noyce, Moore, and Grove’s early vision for Intel….

Intel Foundry is not really a case of “too big to fail”; it is a case of “too intertwined with national security to fail.” There are no other U.S. company alternatives to Intel Foundry: the capital costs of entering advanced chip manufacturing, R&D, and production are staggering, the technology challenges and risks are massive, and all of Intel’s former U.S. competitors have by now exited advanced chipmaking. The national security imperative requires that the U.S. government backstop Intel Foundry,…

In addition to the task of supporting Intel Foundry’s commercial success, there is a longer-term financing task.58 The chips Act is a stop­gap measure. It assures some production in the United States of the pending generation of advanced chip processes, but not the following generations of chips.59 It was a onetime law with the authorization running out, as noted, in 2027; and the funding for new fab construction is already committed. The U.S. semiconductor challenge is a long-term one, and CHIPS was an important but decidedly short-term fix….

...Because the federal government refused to engage in a subsidy competition to finance the massive costs of new semiconductor fabs, no new leading-edge logic fabs had been built in the United States for over a decade, and no new leading-edge memory fabs for roughly two decades, before the chips Act.80 Congress passed the chips Act in recognition of this major security vulnerability.

But the chips Act is only authorized for five years, expiring in 2027, and it is not at all clear that it will be renewed….
 

Congress Is Pushing for a Medicaid Work Requirement. Here’s What Happened When Georgia Tried It. 

[ProPublica, via Naked Capitalism 06-27-2025]

...Georgia, the only state with a Medicaid work mandate, started experimenting with the requirement on July 1, 2023. As the Medicaid program’s two-year anniversary approaches, Georgia has enrolled just a fraction of those eligible, a result health policy researchers largely attribute to bureaucratic hurdles in the state’s work verification system. As of May 2025, approximately 7,500 of the nearly 250,000 eligible Georgians were enrolled, even though state statistics show 64% of that group is working.


Global power shift

Gen. Michael Kurilla and the Pivot to Asia: Part 1 of 3: In America's Great Game, what role does Gen. Kurilla play?

Thomas Neuburger, June 24, 2025 [God’s Spies]

Who’s really in charge of all these wars, the U.S. or Israel? Which is the client state and which the master? 

...Many assert that the tail (Israel or Netanyahu) is wagging the dog. Jeffrey Sachs is one of many with this opinion. Others, like Michael Hudson, believe that we are the boss and Israel is our “landed aircraft carrier” in the Near East.


Iran, China and America's Great Game: Part 2 of 3: Why is Iran so important to U.S. global strategy?

Thomas Neuburger, June 26, 2025 [God’s Spies]

China has been kept in a box by Western sea power since the 1840s. The box is still there. The land road is China’s way out….

...The Belt and Road Initiative — China’s plan to create land routes that bypass Western sea power, a modern Silk Road for goods and energy — runs right through Iran and the first station opened in May.


China’s reusable rocket Zhuque-3 completes major engine cluster test 

[CGTN, via Naked Capitalism 06-22-2025]


Chinese researchers invent silicon photonic multiplexer chip that uses light instead of electricity for communication 

[Tom’s Hardware, via Naked Capitalism 06-22-2025]


Because we need to know and remember …That Grace and Sanity existed in a President

OnenessWarrior, Apr 27, 2025

"In a moment that should’ve stopped time, Jimmy Carter—quiet as a monk, sharp as a scalpel—offered a truth so unassuming, most missed the incision. He was speaking to Trump, but really, he was speaking to all of us.

Carter’s point was this: While China has spent decades laying tracks for the future, we’ve been digging graves in the past. They’ve built cities, schools, trains that move faster than thought. We’ve built military bases, debt, and an empire of rust.

It wasn’t a boast. It was an autopsy.

China chose infrastructure. We chose interference. They built railways across continents. We bombed bridges across borders. They invested in AI, medicine, and education. We invested in overthrowing oil-rich governments, branding it freedom….


Gaza / Palestine / Israel

Israel-Iran: The Denouement 

[Simplicius, via Naked Capitalism 06-28-2025]

[TW: An important summary that dispenses with much misinformation. For example, four of the Iranian military leaders Israel claimed to have killed have returned to public view.]


Mark Sleboda – What the Hell Just Happened in the Middle East You May Ask? 

[Moon of Alabama, via Naked Capitalism 06-26-2025]


Israel Suffered Extensive Damage 

Larry Johnson [via Naked Capitalism 06-27-2025]


US Missile Defenses Heavily Depleted in Shielding Israel: report 

[Newsweek, June 27, 2025 [via Moon of Alabama]

The U.S. drew down a significant portion of its advanced anti-missile system to bolster Israel's defense against Iranian aerial attacks during a 12-day conflict in which Israel and the U.S. struck nuclear facilities and Iran retaliated with missile launches, according to defense news outlets and independent analysts…. the United States used an estimated 15 to 20 percent of its global THAAD missile interceptor stockpile, incurring unprecedented costs exceeding $800 million, according to the Bulgarian Military News and Military Watch Magazine outlets.


Humiliation: Israel Tucks Tail After Failing All Objectives in War against Victorious Iran 

[Simplicius, via Naked Capitalism 06-25-2025]

Yesterday, Iran retaliated for the US ‘strikes’ on its nuclear facilities, concluding the final act of the choreographed play we’ve been witnessing…. The US claims everything was intercepted, and of course, again it was revealed that the entire act was ‘agreed upon’ between both sides.... 

The reasons were obvious, as the above article titles hint at: Israel was being attritioned, its economy ravaged, its largest seaport and airports shutdown, and some sources claim, its fuel and ammo stockpiles dwindling. Technical ‘superiority’ aside, Iran is a country of 90+ million (to Ted Cruz’s eternal chagrin), and Israel’s 9 million would be hard pressed to wage a war of attrition against it, with or without US’ help.

Iranian attacks were beginning to add up, devastating Israeli neighborhoods and turning citizenry against their government….


Tallying the Costs to Israel of Its Failed Iran Regime Change Operation

Yves Smith, June 26, 2025 [Naked Capitalism]

Israel entered the 12-day exchange convinced it could absorb costs; the ledger now shows a nation bleeding cash, talent, and confidence. Direct military outlays hit $5 B in the first week, then ballooned to $725 M every 24 hours, $593 M on offensive strikes that failed to silence Iran, $132 M on frantic mobilisation and missile intercepts that still let 400 warheads through. Iron Dome batteries alone inhaled $10 M to $200 M per day while Iranian salvos sailed past them and erased $1.47 B in civilian property, triggering 38 700 damage claims, 11 000 evacuations, and 30 condemned high-rise skeletons across Tel Aviv’s financial spine.

The Weizmann Institute, Israel’s prestige export, lies in shards, 45 labs gone and $500 M in biomedical IP incinerated, pulling decades of grant pipelines and pharma partnerships off the table overnight. Intel’s Kiryat Gat fabs froze mid-wafer, choking a supply chain that feeds 64 % of Israel’s exports and 1/5 of its GDP; the high-tech sector now runs on skeleton crews because 300 000 reservists were yanked from R&D floors and data centers to guard empty runways at Tel Nof. Commercial flights halted twice at Ben Gurion, insurers jacked premiums, and foreign airlines rerouted around a country that once sold itself as the region’s safe hub.

Capital is already in flight. More than 80 000 Israelis emigrated in 2024, the largest outflow since 1948, pushing the two-year total above 500 000 and forcing Netanyahu’s cabinet to slap a travel ban on Jewish dual nationals to stem the leak. Investor confidence cratered: venture funds paused term sheets, construction sites stand idle, and mega-projects wait on credit that no longer clears. The finance ministry, staring at a deficit set to shove public debt past 75 % of GDP, begged for an extra $857 M in defence cash while slicing $200 M from hospitals and schools.

Analysts peg Israel’s aggregate loss between $11.5 B and $17.8 B, up to 3.3 % of GDP, before counting long-tail hits from halted exports, cancelled IPOs, and sovereign-risk downgrades. Iran, still sitting on its uranium stockpile, spent a fraction of that yet forced the self-styled “Start-Up Nation” into a liquidity scramble, an insurance panic, and a brain-drain spiral. Tel Aviv promised deterrence; Tehran handed it a balance sheet in red ink and the visible stamp of strategic humiliation.


Marco Rubio Says It’s ‘Irrelevant’ Whether Iran Decided To Build a Nuclear Weapon 

[Antiwar, via Naked Capitalism 06-24-2025]


'It's a Killing Field': IDF Soldiers Ordered to Shoot Deliberately at Unarmed Gazans Waiting for Humanitarian Aid

Nir HassonYaniv KubovichBar Peleg, June 27, 2025 [Haaretz, via CommonDreams]


THE BURIAL PLAN 

Seymour Hersh [via Naked Capitalism 06-26-2025]


U.S. Used Up 15-20 Percent of its Global THAAD Anti-Missile Arsenal in Just 11 Days of Mid-Intensity Combat: Cost Over $800 Million 

[Military Watch Magazine, via Naked Capitalism 06-26-2025]


The carnage of mainstream neoliberal economics

Argentines reel from health care cutbacks as President Milei’s state overhaul mirrors Trump’s 

[AP, via Naked Capitalism 06-22-2025]


Under neoliberal fire, the right to strike is waning, globally, after years of premeditated attacks to limit it 

[Equal Times, via Naked Capitalism 06-27-2025]


Trumpillnomics

Has Trump’s FTC Abandoned Fair Markets? 

[Washington Monthly, via Naked Capitalism 06-27-2025]


Restoring balance to the economy

Montana’s Bid To Undo Citizens United

Inci Sayki, June 28, 2025 [The Lever]

Former state officials from Montana have launched an ambitious effort to ban dark money and corporate spending from local politics.

The Transparent Election Initiative, a campaign-finance reform nonprofit founded by former state Commissioner of Political Practices Jeff Mangan, has announced what it calls “The Montana Plan,” a constitutional initiative that would bar corporations and anonymous individuals from using political action committees to funnel unlimited, untraceable funds into election campaigns. The ballot measure is slated to go before voters in 2026.

The plan would bypass the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United ruling, which allows unlimited amounts of money from special interest groups, including corporations and unions, to flood political campaigns. According to the Transparent Election Initiative’s website, unlimited corporate spending in politics “drowns out voters’ voices,” and Mangan told NBC Montana in May that people, regardless of their political leanings, are tired of nonstop, excessive money in politics.


‘Housing Unaffordability Is the Primary Cause of Homelessness’ 

[FAIR, via Naked Capitalism 06-23-2025]

CounterSpin interview with Farrah Hassen on criminalizing homelessness


Pay Equity at Kroger 

[Phenomenal World, via Naked Capitalism 06-27-2025]

In June 2023, the annual meeting of Kroger shareholders heard a motion requesting the company to annually report pay gaps across race and gender among its 430,000 workers. Introduced by Sam Dancy, an African American worker at the company and thirty-year member of the Seattle-based United Food and Commercial Workers’ Local 3000, the motion resulted in the unusual interruption of the meeting by Kroger’s then-CEO Rodney McMullen, who personally apologized to Dancy for discrimination he had faced in the workplace. However, McMullen then urged the shareholders to vote down Dancy’s proposal, arguing that such reporting was unnecessary because Kroger’s employees were represented by the UFCW.

Despite the CEO’s protest, the motion passed with 51 percent of votes. In response, Kroger has for the past two years been engaged in enhanced disclosure, issuing financial and corporate statements and data necessary to comply with the shareholders’ decision….


Disrupting mainstream economics

Finance and the Far Right 

[Post-Neoliberalism, via Naked Capitalism 06-23-2025]

...To research the economic policy of the far right in the early 21st century, I set up a database which explores the economic-policy goals of the far right in eight advanced market economies (US, UK, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Netherlands, France, and Italy). I systematically gathered statements far-right parties made over the past twenty years to see if certain goals (e.g., financial regulation or deregulation) are presented consistently over time and whether those goals are also pursued in legislative initiatives (i.e., did the parties not just “say” they supported those initiatives but actually tried to implemented them). The database places a particular focus on the realm of finance because of its critical relevance in contemporary economies and because vote shares for the far right increased considerably since the Global Financial Crisis….

There is also some evidence for the second feature of State Authoritarian Capitalism—the far right’s seeking to truncate the power of democratic institutions. While supporting the expansion of welfare spending in their programmes, these parties also seek to reimplement the gold standard (i.e. backing the national currency with gold reserves, thereby limiting the government’s ability to alter the value of the currency) which will critically hamper their ability to expand government spending –the gold standard restricts the amount of money a government can issue. Furthermore, the parties have criticised bailout programmes implemented during the Global Financial Crisis and COVID-19 as irresponsible and inhibiting market forces. They also tend to object to strong roles for trade unions and do not support workers’ participation in industry/finance…. 


Information age dystopia / surveillance state

The New Face of Surveillance Doesn’t Need Your Face 

[Reclaim the New, via Naked Capitalism 06-25-2025]


Andreessen Horowitz Backs AI Startup Whose Motto Is ‘Cheat at Everything’ 

[Gizmodo, via Naked Capitalism 06-25-2025]


A moral crusade against AI takes shape 

[Blood in the Machine, via Naked Capitalism 06-23-2025]


How artificial intelligence controls your health insurance coverage 

[The Conversation, via Naked Capitalism 06-23-2025]


The Hot, New Plan to Bribe States Into Deregulating Artificial Intelligence 

[Boondoggle, via Naked Capitalism 06-26-2025]


Uncovered: How UK police are hiding their Palantir work 

[Democracy for Sale, via Naked Capitalism 06-27-2025]


Robodebt: When automation fails 

[Can We Still Govern?, via Naked Capitalism 06-24-2025]

From 2016 to 2020, the Australian government operated an automated debt assessment and recovery system, known as “Robodebt,” to recover fraudulent or overpaid welfare benefits. The goal was to save $4.77 billion through debt recovery and reduced public service costs. However, the algorithm and policies at the heart of Robodebt caused wildly inaccurate assessments, and administrative burdens that disproportionately impacted those with the least resources. After a federal court ruled the policy unlawful, the government was forced to terminate Robodebt and agree to a $1.8 billion settlement.


Collapse of independent news media

Beating the Press

Zephyr Teachout, May 28, 2025 [The American Prospect]

In a time of eroding journalistic freedoms, a new book chronicles the deliberate effort to use libel law to bankrupt the independent media we have left.


Climate and environmental crises

Scientists Pitch $117 Trillion Wind-Solar Super Network 

[OilPrice, via Naked Capitalism 06-28-2025]

Scientists propose a $117 trillion global wind-solar grid, arguing it could provide constant, clean power by connecting regions with surplus renewable energy to those in need.

Globally interconnected solar-wind system addresses future electricity demands

[National Library of Medicine,  2025 May 15]


Creating new economic potential - science and technology

HOW THE RUBIN OBSERVATORY WILL REINVENT ASTRONOMY 

[IEEE Spectrum, via Naked Capitalism 06-24-2025]

…Rubin is unlike any telescope ever built. Its exceptionally wide field of view, extreme speed, and massive digital camera will soon begin the 10-year Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) across the entire southern sky. The result will be a high-resolution movie of how our solar system, galaxy, and universe change over time, along with hundreds of petabytes of data representing billions of celestial objects that have never been seen before….

The telescope’s enormous 8.4-meter primary mirror is so flawlessly reflective that it’s essentially invisible. Made of a single piece of low-expansion borosilicate glass covered in a 120-nanometer-thick layer of pure silver, the huge mirror acts as two different mirrors, with a more pronounced curvature toward the center….

Originally, Rubin was intended to be a dark-matter survey telescope, to search for the 85 percent of the mass of the universe that we know exists but can’t identify. In the 1970s, astronomer Vera C. Rubin pioneered a spectroscopic method to measure the speed at which stars orbit around the centers of their galaxies, revealing motion that could be explained only by the presence of a halo of invisible mass at least five times the apparent mass of the galaxies themselves. Dark matter can warp the space around it enough that galaxies act as lenses, bending light from even more distant galaxies as it passes around them. It’s this gravitational lensing that the Rubin observatory was designed to detect on a massive scale….

...Rubin will complement other observatories like the Hubble Space Telescope and the James Webb Space TelescopeHubble’s Wide Field Camera 3 and Webb’s Near Infrared Camera have fields of view of less than 0.05 square degrees each, equivalent to just a few percent of the size of a full moon. The upcoming Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope will see a bit more, with a field of view of about one full moon. Rubin, by contrast, can image 9.6 square degrees at a time—about 45 full moons’ worth of sky….


Democrats' political malpractice

A Democratic Socialist Smashes Wall Street in New York: What Zohran Mamdani Means for the Anti-Monopoly Movement

Matt Stoller [BIG, via Naked Capitalism 06-26-2025]


Who’s Afraid Of Zohran Mamdani?

David Sirota, June 27, 2025 [The Lever]

Democratic Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani’s mayoral primary victory in New York City has prompted an elite panic, the likes of which we’ve rarely seen: Billionaires are desperately seeking a general-election candidate to stop him, former Barack Obama aides are publicly melting down, corporate moguls are threatening a capital strike, and CNBC has become a television forum for nervous breakdowns. Meanwhile, Democratic elites who’ve spent a decade punching left are suddenly trying to align themselves with and take credit for Mamdani’s brand (though not necessarily his agenda).

On the surface, this freak-out can seem as if it’s about policy. Mamdani’s proposals for free buses, universal free child care, faster small-business licensing, higher taxes on the rich, some publicly owned grocery stores, a higher minimum wage, and rent freezes are indeed shocking to oligarchs conditioned to getting everything they want. When you’re so accustomed to privilege, the most minimally humane policies for others can seem like oppression — and Mamdani’s agenda probably feels that way to New York’s billionaires, CEOs, and neoliberals.

And yet, the intensity of the nervous breakdown over his win suggests this is about way more than one mayoral candidate’s important-but-hardly-radical agenda for a single metropolis. This is about power — specifically, the power of money and establishment authority to control outcomes.

Mamdani won despite being vastly outspent and despite being targeted for defeat by both the Democratic machine and the elite liberal media megaphone. His victory is a system defining” moment, not because a charismatic underdog was victorious in one race, but because it was the first time the oligarchy was unable to buy the political results it wanted in such a high-profile contest….


Zohran Mamdani: “This Is The Heart Of The Battle For The Future Of The Democratic Party”

David Sirota, June 25, 2025 [The Lever]

A week before 33-year-old democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani shocked the world by defeating Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic primary for New York City’s mayor, he sat down with David Sirota on the Lever Time podcast to discuss why he thought he had a shot and his plans for City Hall….


Zohran Mamdani and the false promise of "Vote Blue No Matter Who"

Matthew Adarichev, June 27, 2025 [Daily Kos]

Since 2016, progressives like myself have been told to “Vote Blue No Matter Who”. When our preferred candidates, like Bernie Sanders, were defeated, we were told by moderate Democratic candidates to put our differences aside, not be selfish, and support them. Even if we had policy disagreements, it would be for the greater good to support those candidates to avoid electing a Republican.

We obliged.

The New York City Democratic mayoral primary has illuminated what I suspected to be the case: this agreement only went one way….

What I take from all this is that “Vote Blue No Matter Who” always went one way. It was a slogan to badger progressives into supporting moderate candidates, but now that the shoe is on the other foot, moderate politicians are suddenly unwilling to put aside their differences. To them I say the same thing they told me:

I am sorry that your preferred candidate lost. I understand you may not agree with all of the positions taken by Zohran Mamdani. Nevertheless, it is time to support our Democratic nominee for the sake of maintaining Democratic Party unity as we fight against fascism.


This Is The Beginning of The End of The 9/11 Era

Spencer Ackerman, 25 Jun 2025 [forever-wars.com]

...And tonight, against all odds, against DoorDash, against Michael Bloomberg, against Bill Ackman, against Palantir's Alex Karp, against Andrew Cuomo, against the Murdoch media behemoth, against Bill Clinton, against Jim Clyburn, against the entire Democratic Party, Zohran Mamdani will win the Democratic nomination for mayor. The ranked-vote total will confirm it; Cuomo stunningly conceded the nomination.

For three weeks, every time I turned on the local news, every time I turned on a basketball or a baseball game, every time I loaded a YouTube video, every time I went to my mailbox, I saw those forces call Zohran Mamdani a dangerous, antisemitic jihadi. When I went out to do some poll visibility for Mamdani earlier today, one of the very few people who expressed hostility to Zohran hissed at me that Mamdani was flirting with a slogan that meant killing Jews. They threw 9/11 Politics, in both its 2001 version and its 10/7 variant, at Zohran….

It is important, it is revealing, and it is crucial to observe who played 9/11 Politics against Zohran. Who made a deliberate point of trying to make Jews like me hate and fear Zohran….

They will do all of this because they see what the people of New York did tonight as a test case. And they are correct. If a socialist can wrest power from the servants of oligarchy in the financial capital of the world—well, my friends around this country, around this world, what can you do to take the power back from them where you live?

And the advancement of that movement—for socialism, for freedom, for social peace, for the unity of the multiethnic working class—is how we end the 9/11 Era. Not shallow declarations by Security State-allegiant politicians funded by AIPAC that merely look toward the next war. By organizing and outcompeting them.


Coffee Break: Is Mamdani’s Win Over Cuomo The End of Democratic Party Neoliberalism?

Nat Wilson Turner, June 25, 2025 [Naked Capitalism]

David Sirota disected the already begun battle to control the narrative and decide the meaning of Mamdani’s win for The Lever:

in the media class that exists to interpret these moments for the political mainstream, a different story is already being written. And it reveals something deeper: not just confusion, but ideology — one that insists democracy is a performance, not a transfer of power or a mandate for a different set of policies.

For months, pundits dismissed Mamdani as championing too radical, too fringe, too unserious an agenda. But now that he’s clinched the nomination, the narrative is shifting: Mamdani, they say, succeeded not because of his policy program, but because of his energy, his style, his vibes. On Pod Save America — a proxy for the entire Democratic political class and its liberal followers — Tommy Vietor praised a video of Mamdani walking across Manhattan for giving him “Obama 2007 feels,” calling it “nimble and fun.”

Then came the pivot.

“I do think it’s worth separating out the style of politics from the policy,” co-host Jon Favreau said. “Because we could have a whole debate about what policy positions can win… but if there’s a center-left candidate who campaigns like Mamdani, that person could be president.”

That’s the tell.

This is not a new trick. When liberal elites feel threatened by a winning candidate whose politics could actually challenge capital, they seek to depoliticize the victory and attribute it to vibes, marketing savvy, and brand. It’s a containment strategy: Treat the insurgent’s style as admirable while ignoring — or quietly discrediting — their policy platform. That way, the establishment gets to appropriate the energy without having to endorse the demands.


What It Took To Win: Thoughts on Zohran Mamdani's Popular Front

John Ganz, June 26, 2025 [Unpopular Front]

...The lesson Mamdani and his strategists evidently took from the presidential election and the return of Trump was that the weakness of the Democratic establishment with its traditionally loyal constituencies signalled an opening for another kind of protest politics entirely, one that was constructive and positive, rather than rancorous and divisive. Those groups had not been permanently seduced by the right so much as not mobilized and activated by a progressive alternative. And they noticed there was an entire universe of motivated voters (and, importantly, volunteers) out there just waiting to be reactivated: Veterans of Bernie 2016, 2020, Warrenistas, and all the civic movements of the 2010s who had not given up but were simply dormant, waiting for new leadership. Then he diligently added to this base.

What I found particularly notable is Zohran’s outreach to small business owners, which in New York, contains a lot of recent immigrants. Rather than treat them as “petit bourgeois reactionaries” ensorcelled by Trump’s politics of resentment, his campaign saw them as small-d democrats who were not wedded to either party….

...Something else needs to be said about the Mamdani’s “M” and the Cuomo’s U” on this chart. It reflects Old New York vs. New New York and therefore two different forms of civil society. Mamdani captured more recent arrivals in New York, across cultural and class lines: post-college professionals on the make (or, in many cases, downwardly mobile white-collar workers who are being proletarianized or bohemianized) and recent immigrants from abroad. Cuomo appealed to the old gentry and business oligarchy (now more Wharton School than Edith Wharton) on the Upper East and West Sides and the old working class in the outer boroughs. And in many cases, they are quite literally old: the youth broke strongly Mamdani. But they also represent an earlier form of social organization: Cuomo campaigned at union halls and churches. Traditionally, these are good places to meet the electorate. But the clear lesson of the past decade was that the old civic associations’ power to control and mobilize the electorate has been steadily weakening. Remember that the “machine” as it is called, was built in another epoch; it pre-dates even the labor union, the radio, and television! It has survived in an etiolated form but is no match for the instantaneous powers of communication available in our era. Machine bosses were considered a throwback already by the 1970s. In his entitlement and laziness, Cuomo thought this tenuous structure would be enough. It wasn’t. It simply doesn’t serve or talk to enough voters anymore. The machine broke down because it’s old and rusty….


What Zohran's victory reveals about Democratic leaders: They are finally putting up a fight — against their voters

Jordan Zakarin, June 27, 2025 [www.progressreport.news]

Challenging the status quo is not antisemitic

Using antisemitism as a cover is particularly egregious because it continues to be used to silence dissent against what has become a wildly unpopular war in Gaza, one of the issues where Democratic leaders ignore their voters most. Democratic voters are overwhelmingly opposed to the war, want to see a cease-fire, and vehemently disagree with the country’s attacks on Iran, but leadership cannot even bring itself to condemn Donald Trump’s decision to enter the United States into the war.

In fact, “antisemitism” has been so warped and weaponized that it is now being used as code to discredit entirely unrelated policies that excite the base but so inconvenience the Democratic elite. Earlier today, Peter Orszag, who served as the Obama administration’s OMB director and is now the head of financial megafirm Lazard, spoke out against Mamdani as evidence that the Democratic Party is “increasingly antisemitic and anti-capitalism."

He made the smear to CNBC, a network that has devoted itself to trashing anyone who so much as suggests that the wealthiest Americans should pay a bit more than subterranean tax rates. That’s the network’s prerogative — on Wednesday, anchor Jim Cramer fretted that billionaires in NYC would be shot under Mayor Mamdani, and they’re welcome to continue to sound idiotic — but the only reason to insert antisemitism onto the mix is to discredit popular, populist economic policies by association.



How To End Democrats’ Civil War

David Sirota, June 23, 2025 [The Lever]

...A brief recap for those just tuning in: Abundance is a new bestselling book by The New York Times’ Ezra Klein and The Atlantic’s Derek Thompson, as well as a catchall term for a group of billionaire-boosted think tanks, pundits, and Democratic operatives aligned behind those authors.

The book’s much-ballyhooed opening narrative describing a utopian future mimics a 2019 short film by Naomi Klein and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — only the abundance version does not aim to conjure an updated version of a far-reaching New Deal. On the contrary, abundance presents itself as the practical idealism of The West Wing, offering a liberal-flavored version of Ronald Reagan’s quip that “the nine most terrifying words in the English language are ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

Across tomes, articlesthink tanks, and symposia, the abundists argue that oligarchy isn’t really America’s big problem. Instead, they assert that government, regulations, unions, and the American Left are the creators of scarcity and the primary obstacles to prosperity — because those forces are allegedly too unfriendly to business on stuff like housing, energy, and health care policy. From that claim flows the abundance movement’s insinuation that the deregulatory assault on the New Deal hasn’t gone far enough.

A growing anti-oligarchy movement on the center-left disagrees, citing evidence that shortages are often caused by the billionaires and corporations who use monopoly power and legalized bribery to control everything.

To sum up anti-oligarchy’s case: The drivers of affordable housing scarcity are real estate moguls algorithmically jacking up rents, monopoly developers limiting supply, Wall Street hucksters running mortgage finance, corporate landlords buying up housing stock, and corrupt politicians helping those powerful interests legislate limits on public-sector construction. The primary problem is not lefty do-gooders’ annoying zoning laws or requirements that apartment owners provide adequate air filtration to their renters, as Abundance implies.

In anti-oligarchy’s telling, the drivers of health care scarcity are the insurance middlemen rationing carehospital monopolies’ price gouging, and private profiteering off publicly financed medical inventions. The primary problem is not (yet) a lack of public resources for scientific innovation, as Abundance seems to suggest….

Anti-oligarchy also disagrees with abundance on how to win elections, and for good reason: Kamala Harris appeased her donors by eschewing anti-oligarchy and was hailed by The Washington Post for “running on an abundance agenda” — and she was then defeated by President Donald Trump in the 2024 election. Now, new polling data show the abundance argument about red tape is a far weaker Democratic argument than a sharp case against plutocrats….


Rust Belt Voters Want a New Political Formation Does Anyone Have the Guts to Build It?

Les Leopold, June 24, 2025

...But the combination of widespread disaffection alongside extreme party polarization has put more and more races outside the realm of possibility for any Democrat. Even economic populist Dems, like former Ohio senator Sherrod Brown, who avoid most of the pitfalls that plague Democrats’ reputation among working class voters, are unable to overcome this dynamic. The Democratic brand is now simply too tarnished and polarization too strong among working-class voters in many purple and especially red states.

Today most Democrats simply can’t win — and there is increasingly little that can be done about it. As Bernie Sanders has recently argued, it is “highly unlikely” that the Democratic high command will “learn the lessons of their defeat and create a party that stands with the working class and is prepared to take on the enormously powerful special interests that dominate our economy, our media, and our political life.”


Resistance

Lessons for protesters from Standing Rock 

[HEATED, via Naked Capitalism 06-23-2025]

During the high-profile demonstrations against the Dakota Access pipeline in 2016, the FBI sent several informants disguised as protesters to infiltrate activist communities.

The FBI wasn’t alone. The pipeline company, Energy Transfer Partners, hired a private mercenary and security firm called TigerSwan to conduct a sweeping protester surveillance operation. Part of that operation included sending undercover operatives “to collect information on the protesters, explicitly targeting those who were down on their luck,“ according to a 2018 investigation published by the Intercept.

The information collected by these surveillance operations was not only used to set up individual protesters during the demonstrations, which were led by the Standing Rock Sioux. It was eventually used to justify a massive conspiracy lawsuit against the environmental group Greenpeace. The lawsuit accused the group of inciting the protests in a bid to increase donations….


University Unions Stand Up to Trump’s Research Cuts While Administrators Waver

Brock Hrehor, Jaelyn Rodriguez, K.M. Slade, Nic Suarez, June 26, 2025 [The American Prospect]

While some universities have capitulated to Trump’s NIH cuts, there are faculty and graduate student union leaders on the frontlines pushing back.


Conservative / Libertarian / (anti)Republican Drive to Civil War

I Watched the All-In Podcast So You Don’t Have To: A Journey Through the Moral Abyss of Silicon Valley’s Most Dangerous Men

Mike Brock, June 28, 2025 [Notes From The Circus]

...I watched the latest All-In Podcast so you don’t have to. Consider this a public service—a guided tour through the moral wasteland that four wealthy men have constructed around themselves, complete with corporate sponsors and millions of devoted followers who mistake nihilism for wisdom.

What you’re about to read is not entertainment. It’s forensic analysis of how civilizational collapse sounds when it’s performed by people who profit from the wreckage. It’s documentation of how moral depravity presents itself when it has enough money to buy respectability and enough sophistication to make destruction sound like progress.

These are not good men having bad days. These are not decent people making regrettable choices. These are moral vampires who have discovered that there is considerable profit in packaging sociopathy as insight, nihilism as sophistication, and the systematic destruction of democratic civilization as just another investment opportunity….

...But the most dangerous figure in this moral wasteland is David Sacks—the man who represents everything wrong with how intelligence can be weaponized against wisdom, how sophistication can be corrupted into sedition.

Sacks is brilliant. This makes him infinitely more dangerous than his co-hosts because he understands exactly what he’s doing. When he provides legal justifications for authoritarian overreach, when he constructs constitutional arguments for unconstitutional behavior, when he uses his Stanford Law credentials to legitimize the systematic destruction of democratic institutions—he knows precisely what he’s enabling.

Listen to him defend federal military deployment against American citizens….


How Pharma, Oil, And Wall Street Funded Trump’s Tax Scam

Tony Carrk, June 26, 2025 [The Lever]

...But as Senate Republicans now scramble to try to pass the bill by the July 4 deadline demanded by President Donald Trump, the majority aren’t taking their cues from their constituents. They’re listening to the wealthiest Americans and big businesses who’ve gamed the political system to their benefit.

How do we know? Just look at who’s funding the fight.

One of the leading groups running advertisements supporting the “Big Beautiful Betrayal” is the American Action Network. The conservative dark money group spent $4 million to assert that the tax bill will help ordinary Americans, conveniently leaving out the cuts the bill would make to Medicaid and how it would sunset Affordable Care Act subsidies.

It’s no coincidence the group is peddling a narrative endorsed by big drug companies. Since 2020, the lobbying group Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America has funneled a staggering $17.5 million to the American Action Network….


When The Truth Makes You Uncomfortable, Just Bury It: Louisiana Finds A Solution To The Problems Of Objectivity & Fact-Finding

[Protect Democracy, June 25, 2025, downwithtyranny.com]

A Tulane University environmental researcher, Dr. Kimberly Terrell, was forced to leave her position with the university’s Environmental Law Clinic after years of publishing results of her research that documented, totally unsurprisingly, racial bias in location of highly-polluting industries, racial bias in hiring, and the health impacts of polluting industries being located in populated areas. The Clinic supports communities that are engaged in legal disputes with polluting industries, many of which are located along the Mississippi River between New Orleans and Baton Rouge; in the part of the state commonly known as “Cancer Alley.”


Republicans Prepare Sleeper Attack On Pre-Existing Conditions Protections
It's the same old Obamacare sabotage, they're just not bragging about it this time.

Brian Beutler, June 25, 2025 [Off Message]


Mike Johnson Suggests War Powers Act Is Unconstitutional 

[Truthout, via Naked Capitalism 06-26-2025]


Voters Will “Get Over It,” McConnell Tells GOP Colleagues About Medicaid Cuts 

[Truthout, via Naked Capitalism 06-26-2025]


Civic republicanism


The Common Sense of a Wealth Tax: Thomas Paine & Taxation as Freedom from Aristocracy

Jeremy Bearer-Friend, Vanessa Williamson, 1 January 2022 [Scholarly Commons]

...this article provides a close examination of Thomas Paine’s wealth tax proposal in the second volume of The Rights of Man. Unlike Paine’s proposal to tax inheritances, his 1792 proposal to tax wealth on an annual basis is often overlooked. The article identifies Paine’s various design specifications, provides original estimates of the impact of Paine’s wealth tax proposal within his own time period and as applied to billionaires today, and discusses ambiguities in the proposal. The article then places Paine in conversation with the contemporary wealth tax policy debate and demonstrates how Paine informs both the design and evaluation of tax policy. Lastly, the article clarifies the relationship between democratic ideals and taxation, portraying tax policy as a normative expression of republican ideals….

Paine’s work encourages us to consider tax policy as a primarily political endeavor. Rather than a set of technocratic nudges, Paine proposes we assess a tax’s effect in terms of the polity, rather than simply the economy. This standard for evaluating tax policy is remarkably prescient, as 21stCentury proposals to tax wealth again invoke the challenge of concentrated political power as a central rationale. And to the extent that addressing concentrated political power is a central focus for evaluating the desirability of a tax, then tax policy that targets concentrations of wealth becomes the ideal form of tax. If the corruptions of political and economic life that Paine criticized are with us today, his proposal warrants serious consideration.

Indeed, Paine’s proposal seems especially relevant to the contemporary moment if we directly compare the wealth distribution of late 18th Century Britain with that of the contemporary United States. At the start of the 19th Century, the top one percent of British households received about 15 percent of the total national income. In the United States today, the amount of income received by the top 1% of earners has risen from 10 percent in 1980 to 19% in 2019. Similarly, the top 1% of estates in Paine’s Britain held 24% of all wealth; the top 1% of American households have 27% of total wealth. The level of economic inequality in the contemporary United States is strikingly similar to the level that Paine believed corrupted British politics. And, just as Paine claimed, extremes of wealth corrupt American elections and distort American politics. The level at which Paine believed “there ought to be a limit to property, or the accumulation of it by bequest,” is directly comparable to the highest levels of wealth in America today.