Sunday, March 23, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – March 23, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – March 23, 2025

by Tony Wikrent


Managing Unexpected ICE Visits: Best Practices for Employers 

March 19, 2025 [IndustryWeek]



Trump not violating any law

'He who saves his Country does not violate any Law'


‘We’re Not Stopping’: Trump Border Czar Vows to Ignore Judges

[The Daily Beast, via MSN 03-18-2025]


Iran-Contra Paved the Way for Trump to Defy Democratic Norms

Sam Lebovic, March 7, 2025 [Bloomberg]

... In The Breach: Iran-Contra and the Assault on American Democracy (The University of North Carolina Press, March 4), Alan McPherson argues convincingly that Iran-Contra should be plotted not as a minor sideshow in the Cold War’s final act, nor as a case study in flawed national-security policymaking, but as a key moment in the collapse of democratic norms.

McPherson was inspired to return to the improvised, personalized diplomacy of the affair while watching the first impeachment of Donald Trump in 2019. But his argument has become even more compelling in the first weeks of Trump 2.0. In McPherson’s telling, Iran-Contra was an assault on democratic governance by an extremist executive branch. The results — corruption, deception, willful illegality, lack of accountability — are starting to look familiar….

Defying Congress and the law required operating in secrecy, which also meant sidelining the federal bureaucracy. Policy was conducted instead by a small cluster of officials close to the White House, who delegated key tasks to a coterie of allies who weren’t elected, some of whom weren’t even really part of the government. McPherson is particularly good at highlighting the corruption that flourished in such a freewheeling environment. Weapons sales to Iran were managed by a small firm known, appropriately, as “The Enterprise” — operating for profit, its owners marked up the price of the missiles and decided to pay themselves millions of dollars in commission….

This was all part of a radical revision of the role of the presidency. Lawyers in the Reagan administration embraced what is known as the Unitary Executive Theory — a reading of the Constitution in which the president has sole and complete authority over the executive branch. That meant sidelining Congress and ending the independence of the bureaucracy. Edwin Meese, Reagan’s second attorney general — who would resign in 1988 amid corruption allegations — believed “the entire system of independent agencies may be unconstitutional.” Iran-Contra was a perfect illustration of the theory in practice: Congress could be ignored, and policy would run through the White House….

...In a 1992 article in The Nation, playwright Steve Tesich saw Iran-Contra as a prime instance of what he dubbed a newly emerging “post-truth” society: “President Reagan perceived correctly that the public really didn’t want to know the truth. So he lied to us, but he didn’t have to work hard at it.” The title of the piece was “A Government of Lies.”….

But McPherson is right to suggest that Iran-Contra is prologue to our present. The scandals presented an opportunity to send a clear signal that democracy had no tolerance for this kind of politics. The opposite happened. In 1992 Ted Draper, author of one of the first comprehensive histories of the scandals, concluded that “if ever the constitutional democracy of the United States is overthrown, we now have a better idea of how this is likely to be done.” Indeed, Iran-Contra taught politicians lessons — that one could find much room for maneuvers in the inner workings of the government, that the law was flexible, that there would be no consequences if you pushed the envelope or lied about what you were doing.


Nick Miroff and Jonathan Lemire, March 19, 2025 [The Atlantic]
During the first Trump administration, when Stephen Miller’s immigration policy proposals hit obstacles in federal court, rumors would circulate about his plans to dust off arcane presidential powers. Government lawyers were wary of overreach; officials in the West Wing and at the Department of Homeland Security would sometimes snicker….

Miller’s approach is different this time. He has unleashed an everything-at-once policy storm modeled after the MAGA guru Stephen K. Bannon’s “flood the zone” formula. Drawing on policy ideas worked up in conservative think tanks during the four years between Trump’s terms, Miller’s plan has been to fire off so many different proposals that some inevitably find a friendly court ruling, three administration officials told us….

Three months after leaving the White House, in April 2021, Miller co-founded a Trump-aligned think tank, the America First Legal Foundation, that he fashioned as a right-wing counter to the American Civil Liberties Union. The group’s lawyers filed scores of lawsuits against the Biden administration and U.S. companies. They also provided legal firepower to Texas Governor Greg Abbott and other Republican officials launching state-level immigration crackdowns….

With Orders, Investigations and Innuendo, Trump and G.O.P. Aim to Cripple the Left

Kenneth P. Vogel and Shane Goldmacher, March 19, 2025 [New York Times]

The president and his allies in Congress are targeting the financial, digital and legal machinery that powers the Democratic Party and much of the progressive political world….

...A small group of White House officials has been working to identify targets and vulnerabilities inside the Democratic ecosystem, taking stock of previous efforts to investigate them, according to two people familiar with the group’s work who requested anonymity to describe it.

Scott Walter, president of the conservative watchdog group Capital Research Center, which monitors liberal money in politics, recently briefed senior White House officials on a range of donors, nonprofit groups and fund-raising techniques. The White House group is said to be exploring what more can be done within the law….

Some of the president’s allies have welcomed the moves as payback for Democratic congressional investigations of Mr. Trump and Republican political networks.

“Democrats ran breathless investigations of Republican dark money for years, and I hope that this is a concerted effort to go after the left’s dark money,” said Mike Davis, a former Republican congressional aide who founded a group using what he calls brass-knuckle tactics to assail Mr. Trump’s critics….


Trump picks his next Big Law target

[Politico, via Wall Street on Parade, March 17, 2025]

President Donald Trump continued his retaliatory spree against major law firms on Friday, signing an executive order targeting New York firm Paul, Weiss days after a judge ruled that major parts of a similar order were unconstitutional.

Trump’s new order seeks to suspend the security clearances of attorneys with the firm and limit their access to government buildings, ability to get federal jobs and receive money from federal contracts….


Why Trump Tried to Fire Federal Trade Commission Democrats 

BIG by Matt Stoller

...What is this dispute really about?

So what happened? As best as I can tell, the real reason for this move is that someone in the administration wanted to establish a basic principle of governance, that the President is in charge, and not the “Deep State.”

The White House is already embroiled in a bunch of fights over who runs which parts of government. And one way to understand this action at the FTC is as part of a legal strategy to tell the courts, in a uniform way, that Trump, as the democratically elected leader, believes the Constitution empowers him to execute all Federal policy however he chooses.

And that’s a reasonable view, though the alternative - that Congress should be able to design institutions with some flexibility - is also reasonable. That said, ultimately, all roads here lead to the Federal Reserve. The logic of Trump takes us there. As Slaughter said earlier today on CNBC, if any commissioner at any agency can be fired by the President for any reason, then so can the Federal Reserve Chair or any Fed board member.

And that’s a fight Trump, and the Supreme Court, just don’t want to have, because Wall Street would absolutely freak out. Basically, the real Trump argument is that all the little people regulators must constitutionally be controlled by the President, but the one big guy, the Fed, is constitutionally run by Wall Street. I’m not kidding. In a case about the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Justice Alito actually put that in a footnote in his dissent. His legal rationale for why the Fed should be treated differently is that the Fed “should be regarded as a special arrangement sanctioned by history,” as it is a “unique institution with a unique historical background.”

Alito is a very smart guy, yet that’s the best he could come up with. This rationale is the legal equivalent of a t-shirt they sell at the beach that says “I’m the Mommy that’s why.” In a sense, the unaccountable secretive Supreme Court looks at the Fed, and game recognizes game. If Trump succeeds in taking apart the FTC’s independence, the Fed’s independence comes next.


10-year-old American citizen recovering from brain tumor deported to Mexico

psychbob, March 22, 2025 [Daily Kos]


Venezuelan Professional Goalkeeper Deported to El Salvador Prison, Stunning Family Back Home

Ryan Grim and Sarah Hay, Marcg 20, 2025 [dropsitenews]


Republican files impeachment against judge who ruled against Trump deportations 

[The Hill, via Naked Capitalism 03-19-2025]


Boasberg impeachment resolution reaches 16 cosponsors

[Punchbowl News, March 21, 2025


Trump v. Boasberg: If This Isn’t a Constitutional Crisis, What Is?

Michael Tomasky, March 21, 2025 [The New Republic]


Trump’s Appetite for Revenge Is Insatiable

Peter Wehner, March 20, 2025 [The Atlantic]


A Statement from Constitutional Law Scholars on Columbia [University]

Steven G. Calabresi, Erwin Chemerinsky, Eugene Volokh, Michael C. Dorf, David Cole, and 13 other scholars, March 20, 2025 [The New York Review]

The government may not threaten funding cuts as a tool to pressure recipients into suppressing First Amendment–protected speech.

[TW: But Trump’s regime did. And without any legal consequences to itself.]


The Insidious Doctrine Fueling the Case Against Mahmoud Khalil

Debbie Nathan, March 21, 2025 [Boston Review]

How a century of immigration law has evaded constitutional rights.

...Yes, the First Amendment offers speech protections. But we also have a lesser-known idea that has influenced congressional and executive branch–mandated immigration law for well over a century: the plenary power doctrine. According to the doctrine’s principles, judges should avoid ruling on whether or not immigration laws are constitutional, even when it appears they are not….


The October Story That Outlined Exactly What the Trump Administration Would Do to the Federal Bureaucracy

Stephen Engelberg, March 20, 2025 [ProPublica]

In late October, ProPublica published one of its most prophetic stories in our history….  “‘Put Them in Trauma’: Inside a Key MAGA Leader’s Plans for a New Trump Agenda,”….

The story drew on private recordings of a series of speeches given in 2023 and 2024 by Russell Vought obtained by our colleagues at Documented, a news site with a remarkable knack for uncovering information powerful interests would prefer remained secret.


Trump Declares War on “Frivolous” Lawsuits

Stephanie Mencimer, March 22, 2025 [Mother Jones]

Late Friday night, the White House released the latest tranche of Trump executive actions and directives aimed at further kneecapping some of the nation’s most famous lawyers and law firms the president believes are obstructing his agenda or have tangled with him in the past.

One of the late-night directives is entitled “Preventing Abuses of the Legal System and the Federal Court.” Both terrifying and hilarious given its author, the memo instructs Attorney General Pam Bondi and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to aggressively pursue court sanctions and disciplinary actions against lawyers and law firms that engage in “grossly unethical misconduct,” which it mainly seems to define as lawyers and lawsuits Trump doesn’t like. Singled out for persecution are immigration lawyers and “Big Law” firms with pro bono practices that represent immigrants or litigate against the federal government, as well as Democratic Party lawyer Marc Elias.


Move Fast and Break the Mortgage Market

David Dayen, March 20, 2025 [The American Prospect]

On Monday, according to securities filings, Bill Pulte, the new director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), appointed himself chair of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, known as the government-sponsored enterprises, or GSEs. Pulte came from a family business that is now the third-largest homebuilder in the country, but he left that behind to run a private equity firm, and became renowned as a meme-stock impresario, hyping companies like GameStop or Bed Bath & Beyond to retail investors.

Pulte, whose agency currently has the power of management over Fannie and Freddie, also removed 14 of the 25 sitting board members at the two companies. In addition to himself and Clinton Jones, the FHFA general counsel who was appointed to both boards, Pulte added four other board members, including a former portfolio manager with well-known hedge fund Elliott Management and (briefly) an engineer tied to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Another new board member, Brandon Hamara, previously worked for Pulte.


Men DOGEbags at Work

‘It’s a Heist’: Real Federal Auditors Are Horrified by DOGE 

[Wired, via Naked Capitalism 03-19-2025]

[TW: An important expose of how the DOGEbags are simply not qualified, trained, or educated to do the work they claim to be doing.]

...But two federal auditors with years of experience, who have both worked on financial and technical audits for the government, say that DOGE’s actions are the furthest thing from what an actual audit looks like. Both asked to speak on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t permitted to speak to the press.

“Honestly, comparing real auditing to what DOGE is doing, there’s no comparison,” says one of the auditors who spoke to WIRED. “None of them are auditors.”….

The auditors who spoke to WIRED allege that not only is Musk’s claim not true, but also that DOGE appears to have completely eschewed the existing processes for actually rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse….

“You can’t coherently audit something like the whole Social Security system in a week or two,” says the second auditor. It’s exactly this rush to crack systems open without full understanding, the auditors say, that has led to Elon Musk’s false claims that 150-year-olds were receiving Social Security benefits. “It could be that DOGE didn’t de-dupe the data.” ….

The auditors described a lengthy vetting process that allowed them to get the permissions necessary to dive into an agency’s data and systems. In addition to going through the initial vetting process, the auditors say that they are required to engage in continuing education.

“None of them have any auditing background, none have any certifications, none have any clearances,” says the first auditor.

Federal workers who have spoken to WIRED expressed concern that DOGE’s operatives appear to have bypassed the normal security clearance protocols in order to access sensitive systems. WIRED found that many of DOGE’s youngest members, all of whom were 25 or younger, have very limited work experience, and none in the government. One, Edward Coristine, who goes by “Big Balls” online, appears to be a 19-year-old high school graduate. Despite this, they were given high-level access at places like the GSA, the Social Security Administration, and the Treasury. Others, like those at the Federal Aviation Administration, come directly from Musk’s own companies and were not fully vetted before their start dates…..

Josh Marshall, March 22nd, 2025 [Talking Points Memo]
The Post reports today that the IRS’s internal projections estimate that the DOGE-driven disruptions to the IRS since the inauguration are on track to have reduced tax receipts by more than $500 billion by April 15th. This, to be clear, is not a final tally. It’s not April 15th yet. It’s a projection based on historical data, the number of people who’ve filed, paid owed amounts of tax etc. It’s worth taking a moment to put this number into some context in case half a trillion dollars doesn’t do it for you. Non-defense discretionary spending is the cost to fund the US government once you take out mandatory spending (mostly Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid) and the cost of the US military. For 2023 that number was $917 billion. So that’s most of the stuff we think of as the government, apart from those payment programs and the military. In other words, in about eight weeks DOGE managed to lose the US government, more or less light fire, more than half of what goes to all non-defense discretionary spending.


Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday the Trump administration is focused on preventing a financial crisis that could be the result of massive government spending over the past few years 

[CNBC, via Naked Capitalism 03-18-2025]

[Yves Smith: “Understand what is going on. Fed and Treasury officials historically have ALWAYS bent over backwards to reassure investors even as they labor behind the scenes to tackle looming issues. They never never never talk up the prospect of a crisis. This is Bessant acting at the front man to justify DOGE wreckage of many institutions and programs….with no meaningful impact on the deficit, among other reasons because the savings claimed are gross fabrications. Bessant’s noise-making is to justify going after Social Security and Medicare.”]


DOGE Going Dark as Evidence of Fabrications, Destructive Results and Citizen Anger Rises

Yves Smith, March 17, 2025 [Naked Capitalism]


As DOGE Mauls Social Security, Profit-Hungry Private Equity Is Swooping In 

[Truthout, via Naked Capitalism 03-20-2025]


DC Metro Police Roust Staff of Indy Agency At DOGE’s Request

Josh Marshall, March 18, 2025 [Talking Points Memo]

In the background over the last couple of weeks, I’ve been trying to find out about the purported activities of the U.S. Marshals Service working at the behest of DOGE. When DOGE operatives took over the Foundation for African Development a couple of weeks ago, they reportedly made forced entry with the assistance of the U.S. Marshals. That’s not really what the Marshals do….

When I poked around, it seemed like people just assumed they were Marshals. Or perhaps they identified themselves as such. But the more questions I asked, the less clear it was who they really were, notwithstanding the press reports that simply stated it as a fact….

It turns out, that’s not what happened at all. According to the later-published full account in the Times, the U.S. Marshals Service wasn’t even there. DOGE operatives arrived in black SUVs along with FBI agents and accompanied “by what appeared to be private security who arrived in separate vehicles and were dressed in street clothing.”….

But it wasn’t the FBI agents or the “private security” who rousted the USIP staff out of their office. It was the DC Metro police….   

Billionaire commerce secretary says only 'fraudsters' need Social Security

Emily Singer, March 21, 2025 [Daily Kos]

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick made an appearance on Trump stooge David Sacks’ podcast “All In” on Thursday, during which he said that anyone calling for help because their Social Security check did not get paid is likely a fraudster.

"Let's say Social Security didn't send out their checks this month. My mother-in-law, who's 94, she wouldn't call and complain. She just wouldn't. She thinks something got messed up and she'll get it next month. A fraudster always makes the loudest noise screaming, yelling, and complaining. And all the guys who did PayPal, like Elon knows this by heart, right? Anybody who's been in the payment system and the process system knows the easiest way to find the fraudster is to stop payments and listen,” he said….

Approximately half of the population aged 65 or older living in households that receive at least 50% of their family income from Social Security benefits, and about 25% rely on Social Security benefits for at least 90% of their family income, according to a 2017 report from the Social Security Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics.


Here’s a ‘dead’ person on Social Security in Seattle, with plenty to say

[Seattle Times, March 15, 2025]

Johnson’s strange trip through the netherworld began in February, when a letter from his bank arrived addressed to his wife, Pam.

“We recently received notification of LEONARD A. JOHNSON’s passing,” it began. “We offer our sincerest condolences …”

At first she figured it was a scam — her husband, after all, was sitting right there. But then the bank got to the point.

“We know this is a difficult time, and we’re here to help,” the bank wrote. “We received a request from Social Security Administration to return benefits paid to LEONARD A. JOHNSON’s account after their passing.”

“There’s nothing you need to do — we’ve deducted the funds from LEONARD A. JOHNSON’s account.”

Uh oh. It itemized how $5,201 had been stricken from their bank account, on the grounds that Ned wasn’t justified to get those benefits — because he was dead. That was for payments he’d received in December and January….

What followed was a nearly three-week battle to resurrect himself. He called Social Security two or three times a day for two weeks, with each call put on hold and then eventually disconnected. Finally someone answered and gave him an appointment for March 13. Then he got a call delaying that to March 24.

In a huff, he went to the office on the ninth floor of the Henry Jackson Federal Building downtown. It’s one of the buildings proposed to be closed under what the AP called “a frenetic and error-riddled push by Elon Musk’s budget-cutting advisers.”

It was like a Depression-era scene, he said, with a queue 50-deep jockeying for the attentions of two tellers. The employees were kind but beleaguered.

“They are so understaffed down there,” he said. “They think the office is about to be closed down, and they don’t know where they’re going to go. It feels like the agency’s being gutted.”

After waiting for four hours, Johnson admits he jumped the line: “I saw an opening and I kind of rushed up and told them I was listed as dead. That seemed to get their attention.”


Oklahoma City man says social security benefits terminated without warning or explanation

[KFOR, Oklahoma City, March 13, 2025]

A local retiree says his Social Security benefits were suddenly suspended without warning — and with no explanation given when he reached out. He worries it may have to do with the place he was born, and ongoing DOGE cutbacks.  

The man, who was born to an active duty U.S. Solider at an overseas U.S. Army base, says because of recent comments from Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) leader Elon Musk, he’s worried his benefits were cut because of his foreign birthplace….


Musk Taps Private Equity Veterans to Aid DOGE at Social Security

[Bloomburg, via Truthout 03-16-2025]

Among those tapped for the task are Antonio Gracias of Valor Equity Partners, who also served on the board of Tesla Inc. and was an early investor in SpaceX — two of Musk’s companies — as well as Scott Coulter, formerly of Lone Pine Capital, and Michael Russo, formerly of Shift4, according to people familiar with the moves who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss them….

Russo arrived Feb. 3, and “introduced himself as a DOGE representative to multiple employees on multiple occasions,” Flick said. He now serves as the agency’s chief information officer. Russo also brought on Akash Bobba, a former intern for Peter Thiel’s Palantir Technologies Inc., to analyze Social Security data.

Bobba’s onboarding was unusual, according to Flick, who said his background check was held up for a few days. She said she received pressure from Russo and Steve Davis, who runs Musk’s Boring Co. and is also working for DOGE, to get Bobba credentials by midnight on Feb. 10. Bobba was sworn in over the phone, “contrary to standard practice,” she said.

[TW: Contrast to new policy that citizens can no longer apply for Social Security over a phone.]


EXCLUSIVE: Memo details Trump plan to sabotage the Social Security Administration

Judd Legum, Mar 17, 2025 [Popular Information, via Gizmodo.com]

An internal Social Security Administration (SSA) memo, sent on March 13 and obtained by Popular Information, details proposed changes to the claims process that would debilitate the agency, cause significant processing delays, and prevent many Americans from applying for or receiving benefits.

The memo, authored by Acting Deputy SSA Commissioner Doris Diaz, purports to be motivated by a desire to mitigate "fraud risks."

Elon Musk has pushed several false claims about the nature and scope of Social Security fraud. In a recent interview on Fox Business, Musk suggested that 10% of federal expenditures were related to Social Security fraud. This is false. Social Security fraud does exist, but "improper" Social Security payments amounts to about $9 billion annually — less than 1% of total Social Security benefits paid and 0.1% of the federal budget. Most improper payments are not criminal fraud but the result of beneficiaries or the SSA failing to update records.

The biggest change contemplated by Diaz's memo is to require "internet identity proofing" for "benefit claims… made over the phone." When an SSA customer is "unable to utilize the internet ID proofing, customers will be required to visit a field office to provide in-person identity documentation." ….

About 40% of all claims are currently processed over the phone.

Because the SSA serves a large population that is either older or physically disabled, many cannot access the internet. Under the new system, this would force these populations to visit an office to have their claim processed. The Diaz memo estimates it would require 75,000 to 85,000 in-person visitors per week to SSA's offices to implement the policy.

SSA offices do not currently have the resources to handle an influx of in-person appointments of this size. In 2023, the most recent data available, there were about 119,128 daily visits, on average, to SSA offices…..

 

An Interview With A Fired NOAA Director

Sabrina Imbler, March 18, 2025 [Defector]


The Revenue and Distributional Effects of IRS Funding 

[The Budget Lab at Yale, via Naked Capitalism 03-17-2025]

“If the IRS shrinks by 50% (a workforce decrease of about 50,000 people),3 we estimate that this significant reduction in IRS staffing and resulting IRS capacity to collect revenues would result in $395 billion ($350 billion net) forgone revenue over the 10-year budget window.4 If the lack of IRS resources leads to a substantial increase in noncompliance, net forgone revenue could rise by $2.4 trillion over 10-years.”


DOGE Is Going to Kill a Lot of Americans

Kenny Stancil, March 19, 2025 [The American Prospect]


On empathy: Elon Musk says empathy is the fundamental weakness of Western Civilization.

Thomas Mills, March 21, 2025

This Is How Tesla Will Die

Will Lockett, March 06, 2025 [via Naked Capitalism 03-19-2025]

...Tesla’s insane valuation over the past few years has enabled the company to take on a ridiculous amount of debt.

As of writing, Tesla has at least $48.39 billion in debt.

However, Musk has also used his Tesla stock as collateral for SpaceX, Twitter, and Tesla loans. Before he bought Twitter, over half of his shares were collateralised; now, that figure is far, far higher. Again, let’s be generous and assume only 70% of his 12.8% stake in Tesla is collateralised in this way, with a third of these loans for Tesla. That would mean Musk has $71.68 billion in personal loans, with $23.89 billion for Tesla.

These loans aren’t accounted towards the company’s liabilities, as they are technically part of the debt owner’s — in this case, Musk’s — personal liabilities.

In other words, Tesla actually has $72.28 billion in debt. That is more than the company is realistically worth!


Inside Trump and Musks’s Takeover of NASA.

David W. Brown, March 21, 2025 [The New Yorker]

...Darren Bossie, the new White House liaison to NASA, arrived shortly after Trump’s Inauguration. Bossie was more or less unknown at the agency, but employees soon found his LinkedIn profile. He had spent four of the past seven years bouncing around conservative politics, with a stint as Trump’s White House liaison to the Department of Veterans Affairs, and had worked as a senior consultant for unnamed companies. For the bulk of his professional life, however—from 2006 to 2018—he had been an assistant manager at a Total Wine & More in Palm Beach County, Florida. “That didn’t seem very promising,” a senior NASA official told me….

A review of public records, however, suggested that Darren is the brother of David N. Bossie, the president of Citizens United—the conservative group whose litigation before the Supreme Court empowered mega-donors and corporations to make unlimited contributions to political candidates. During Trump’s first Presidential run, David was the deputy manager of the campaign; in 2017 and 2018, he was known for fund-raising efforts in support of conservative candidates. During that period, his brother was hired into what appears to have been his first federal job—deputy director of the Office of Secretarial Boards and Councils at the Department of Energy. (In 2019, Trump distanced himself from David Bossie after he was accused of profiting off the President’s likeness; at the time, David said he was being “unfairly targeted by left-wing smear tactics.”) 


Strategic Political Economy

The Underlying Problem: This is happening because some people are too rich

Hamilton Nolan, March 21, 2025 [How Things Work]

...Trump is such a sui generis figure that it is possible to attribute his rise to any combination of a laundry list of personal attributes, social trends, and political events. Is all of this a consequence of Trump’s own celebrity? A racial backlash to the Obama years? The outcome of decades of brain poisoning by right wing media? Pandemic social isolation and inflation manifesting in a national death cult? What the hell?

Still—some causes are bigger than others. Trump’s personality and the rise of Fox News and Musk buying Twitter and the effects of the pandemic and angry old racist whites all contributed to where we are, yes, but they are not “the reason” we got here. If you pull back your focus, away from the individual personalities at play, you can perceive a brittle, dysfunctional system that was sitting there waiting for these guys to step in and run wild. How is it that the richest nation in the history of the world allowed itself to reach a point where all of this was possible? How did the United States of America become so vulnerable?

...The underlying cause of our situation is inequality. We have allowed too few people to accumulate too much wealth. The imbalance has grown so severe that a tiny number of individuals with twelve-figure net worths have the means to purchase so much political power that they can effectively make the federal government’s decisions. The significant thing about the way that Elon Musk is presently dismantling our government is not the existence of his own political delusions, or his own self-interested quest to privatize public functions, or his own misreading of economics; it is the fact that he is able to do it. And he is able to do it because he has several hundred billion dollars. If he did not have several hundred billion dollars he would just be another idiot with bad opinions. Because he has several hundred billion dollars his bad opinions are now our collective lived experience. The inequality, the decades of regulatory failures that led up to Elon Musk’s net worth, were the precondition for all of the insanity that is now playing out. It is easy to lose sight of this amid the daily headlines and the cartoonish corruption and the outrageous statements and the think pieces about the esoteric philosophy of Mencius Moldbug. It is tempting, because of the sudden severity of our situation, to imagine that there is a secret, hidden reason driving it all.

There’s not. This is the outcome of the class war—the same class war that we have been talking about for decades. This is what happens when it is lost….

Democracy is incompatible with the extremity of wealth inequality that we now have in America. The two things cannot coexist. Why? Because an electoral democracy, even the half-functional sort that the US has, only has value if all interest groups have to participate in it. Democracy is a grand gathering of interests around a table, and then a symbolic wrestling match among them all to have their interests represented and defended. Once you have one hundred or two hundred or three hundred billion dollars, however, you do not need to show up and sit around the table. You can buy the whole table. Everyone else sits around your table now, and begs you. Just like that, democracy has been replaced. This is where we are….

The soil from which everything else grew is: Rich people have too much money. That is a political and economic choice, a predictable consequence of the failure to get ahead of capitalism’s well understood tendency to produce this very situation. Here we are. We have allowed it to go too far and now the richest guy is buying total power. The key thing, the big mistake, was letting the rich people get this rich. If they were not this rich—if inequality were not so wide—the various other interests in our democracy would themselves be powerful enough that they could not be outweighed by single oligarchs. But wealth is power, and we let the oligarchs get too much wealth, and they, personally, got stronger than other interest groups that represent millions of people….


Rep. Town Hall Breaks Out in chats “Tax the Rich!” #taxcutsandjobsact [YouTueb video short]

[TW: YouTube video of portion Nebraska Republican Congressman Mike Flood’s town hall when he asks “How can you be against a balanced budget?” and the crowd began to chant "tax the rich." Note the smug look on his face.]

Amos 5

‘Therefore, since you trample the poor continuously,
    taxing his grain,
    building houses of stone in which you won’t live
    and planting fine vineyards from which you won’t drink—
12 and because I know that your transgressions are many,
    and your sins are numerous
as you oppose the righteous,
    taking bribes as a ransom,
        and turning away the poor in courtj
13 therefore the prudent person remains silent at such a time,
    for the time is evil.
    

James 2:14-17

14 What good does it do, my brothers, if someone claims to have faith but does not prove it with actions? This kind of faith cannot save him, can it? 15 Suppose a brother or sister does not have any clothes or daily food 16 and one of you tells them, “Go in peace! Stay warm and eat heartily.” If you do not provide for their bodily needs, what good does it do? 17 In the same way, faith by itself, if it does not prove itself with actions, is dead.


Trump’s Economics—and America’s Economy

James K. Galbraith  [The Nation, via God's Spies, March 20, 2025]

Leaving aside the buckets called “culture wars” and “foreign policy,” we may distinguish eight distinct forces at work in Trump’s economics. They are (a) the targeted destruction of specific regulatory agencies, (b) random disruptions of the federal civil service, (c) old-fashioned Reaganism, (d) tariffs, (e) migration, (f) energy, (g) the military, and (h) the general effect of rash and unpredictable policymaking—otherwise called uncertainty and chaos….

Not all regulation is effective. But quite distinct from its social and health benefits, effective regulation serves the interests of advanced businesses, including in manufacturing, by forcing old, dirty, and unsafe technologies and low-wage competitors out. Trump’s government, like others before it, is—unfortunately for its own declared strategy—in the hands of the reactionary branch of the business elite.

[Thomas Neuburger: “Translation: The troglodytes running this ship could soon be opposed by elites who want to succeed in the actual world, not just in their dreams.”]

[And, Neuberger again:

[James Galbraith is the man who wrote this about Barack Obama when he tried to cut Social Security in 2011:

[T]he President too is a young man. … He'll need a big house in a gated suburb, with high walls and rich friends. And a good income, too, from book deals and lecture fees. He may be thinking about that now. ... [But] it won't save him. For if and when he ventures out, for the rest of his life, the eyes of all those, whose hopes he once raised will follow him. The old, the poor, the jobless, the homeless: their eyes will follow him wherever he goes.

[File under “In case you forgot, it doesn’t all start with Trump.”]


Global power shift

Exposing Britain’s Covert War On Yemen 

Kit Klarenberg [Global Delinquents, via Naked Capitalism 03-20-2025]


The Nuclear War Plan for Iran 

Ken Klippenstein [via Naked Capitalism 03-20-2025]


Gaza / Palestine / Israel

Letter from a Palestinian Political Prisoner in Louisiana 

Dictated over the phone from ICE Detention. Mahmoud Khalil. [via Naked Capitalism 03-19-2025]


Oligarchy

Social Security Is Not a Ponzi Scheme

Lawrence B. Glickman, March 11, 2015 [The Boston Review]

Today’s attacks are just the latest form of backlash to the New Deal.

When Elon Musk called Social Security “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time” on Joe Rogan’s podcast on February 28, he was, wittingly or not, echoing a long line of conservative critics. Over the last fifteen years alone, a long line of Republican politicians—Mick MulvaneyRon JohnsonRick PerryTed Cruz, and Rand Paul—have characterized it the same way….

Inapt though such comparisons may be, they have been a persistent strand of conservative thought ever since 1935, when the Social Security Act became law. The initial conservative backlash—first to the act, then to the other gains of the New Deal era—laid the groundwork for the nine decades of attacks on public goods that have followed. Since then, the strategy has been refined, but the crusade still follows the same four-pronged process: demonize Social Security, claim that the essence of government is found in spending on absurd programs, use the state as a personal piggy bank, and assert that you and your fellow elites have been the real victims all along.

In 1937 a New London, Connecticut, newspaper, evaluating the new “social security scheme,” dismissed it as a “Ponzi-like plan” based upon a philosophy of “something from nothing.” The comparison stuck. In 1956, Clarence Manion, the former Dean of Notre Dame Law School, pioneering conservative radio broadcaster, and future member of the John Birch Society, said the federal government had “[adopted] the Ponzi “‘get rich easy’ scheme as its very own.” In 1981 conservative senator Jesse Helms called Social Security a “Ponzi scheme to buy political popularity at the risk of social security’s ultimate bankruptcy.”….

In accepting the Democratic nomination for the second time in 1936, Roosevelt gave a masterclass in how to counter the likes of DOGE. He called the kind of people whom Dewey addressed “economic royalists” sparing them no mercy in connecting their greed to the undermining of democracy and the diminution of liberty for ordinary Americans: “The privileged princes of these new economic dynasties, thirsting for power, reached out for control over Government itself. They created a new despotism and wrapped it in the robes of legal sanction.” Such people, Roosevelt declared, were “new mercenaries” who “sought to regiment the people, their labor, and their property.” ….


Sanders, AOC Draw Biggest Crowd of Their Careers at Rally to Fight 'Oligarchy' in Denver

Eloise Goldsmith, March 22, 2025 [CommonDreams]


Trumpillnomics

The pain is about to start

Thomas Mills, March 19, 2025 [PoliticsNC]

Right now, Donald Trump is mostly fighting on his turf. He’s made deporting immigrants and cutting government his priorities. He’s getting cheered by Republicans and conservatives for his aggressive actions. It’s not going to last. There are only so many immigrants he can deport before he causes pain in communities. There’s only so much government he can eliminate before the consequences start to hurt people and their families….

We’re only two months into the administration and the consequences of their actions haven’t been felt widely, but they are coming. A friend of mine has been talking to developers about building a few houses on a piece of property he owns. The deal fell through when the builders told him they aren’t taking on any new projects because of the uncertainty of material prices. They can’t estimate costs with Trump jerking the economy around with his on-again-off-again tariff regime.

They also can’t predict labor costs. A lot of those deportees were working in the construction industry. Builders may find themselves paying much higher costs for employees and contractors. Those same concerns will spread across the economy, making businesses reluctant to invest in their companies and hesitant to make long term plans.

The impact of tariffs will hit soon. New cars are about to increase in price from between $4,000 and $12,000. Buy now, because you won’t get a better deal anytime soon. I expect that applies to a lot of other goods, too….


They’re not capitalists — they’re predatory criminals

Trump Administration Gives All Clear to Laundering Money through Shell Companies and Bribing Foreign Officials

Pam Martens and Russ Martens, March 19, 2025 [Wall Street on Parade]


‘Italian vendetta’: SEC targeted by triumphant crypto industry 

[Politico, via Naked Capitalism 03-18-2025]


How TD Became America’s Most Convenient Bank for Money Launderers 

[Bloomberg, via Naked Capitalism 03-19-2025]

[Yves Smith: “Big investigative report. Note we wrote up a recent case seeking to claw back pay and pensions from crooked execs. This article confirms a key element of the thesis of that case, that the execs were in cahoots with the crooks.”]


Disrupting mainstream economics

An Explanation Of Why Taxes Don’t Fund Spending—And Why Elon Musk Is Wrong About The US Government Deficit

Jim Byrne [MMT101.ORG, via Mike Norman Economics, March 16, 2025]


Health care crisis

With crumbling public health infrastructure, rural Texas scrambles to respond to measles 

[The Texas Tribune, via Naked Capitalism 03-16-2025]


Information age dystopia / surveillance state

OpenAI Says It’s “Over” If It Can’t Steal All Your Copyrighted Work 

[Futurism, via Naked Capitalism 03-17-2025]


The Unbelievable Scale of AI’s Pirated-Books Problem

Alex Reisner, March 20, 2025 [The Atlantic]

Court documents released last night show that the senior manager felt it was “really important for [Meta] to get books ASAP,” as “books are actually more important than web data.” Meta employees turned their attention to Library Genesis, or LibGen, one of the largest of the pirated libraries that circulate online. It currently contains more than 7.5 million books and 81 million research papers. Eventually, the team at Meta got permission from “MZ”—an apparent reference to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg—to download and use the data set….

Meta employees acknowledged in their internal communications that training Llama on LibGen presented a “medium-high legal risk,” and discussed a variety of “mitigations” to mask their activity. One employee recommended that developers “remove data clearly marked as pirated/stolen” and “do not externally cite the use of any training data including LibGen.” Another discussed removing any line containing ISBNCopyright©All rights reserved. A Llama-team senior manager suggested fine-tuning Llama to “refuse to answer queries like: ‘reproduce the first three pages of “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone.”’” One employee remarked that “torrenting from a corporate laptop doesn’t feel right.”….

Many in the academic world have argued that publishers have brought this type of piracy on themselves, by making it unnecessarily difficult and expensive to access research. Sci-Hub, a sibling of LibGen, was launched independently in 2011 by a Kazakhstani neuroscience student named Alexandra Elbakyan, whose university didn’t provide access to the big academic databases. In that same year, the hacktivist Aaron Swartz was arrested after taking millions of articles from JSTOR in an attempt to build a similar kind of library….

[TW: The obvious solution — but obvious only if one knows the tenets of civic republicanism — is for all scholarly articles to be in the public domain at their creation, with the creators and publishers paid by a centralized government fund. This fund could be administered by the government, or by a board comprised of scholars and publishers. This scheme of course would destroy the business model of the scholarly publishers — but that is exactly the point of civic republicanism: Each individual in society has a duty as a citizen to promote the General Welfare. Scientists and scholars are the tip of the spear in scientific and technological development: the products of their research should be made as widely available as possible as soon as possible to help advance their fields of inquiry and advance the state of human knowledge. Without scientific and technological development, no society can survive, because of the limits of finite resources at any one point in time of a particular mode of production. Our current dilemmas of private interests overwhelming public interests is the result of liberalism’s fetishization of the rights of property. (The great irony of current conservative and libertarian thinking is that they argue that liberalism has failed, because it has not done enough to shield the rights of property from civic duties and demands of public interest.)]


Climate and environmental crises

More Than 150 ‘Unprecedented’ Climate Disasters Struck World in 2024, Says UN 

[Guardian, via Naked Capitalism 03-22-2025]


Democrats' political malpractice

The Government Funding Law Damages the Legal Pushback on Trump
David Dayen, March 20, 2025 [The American Prospect]

Here’s why Chuck Schumer’s cave-in was beneficial to Trump’s legally shaky slashing of spending and the federal workforce.….

...The bigger point here is that if the only way to constrain Trump on these budgetary issues is through the courts, then you would want to take a course that doesn’t materially harm the legal arguments. Precisely by granting government funding that leaves the particulars up to the executive, those legal arguments have been harmed. Even outside of the political argument that cowering in the face of a fight makes the Democrats a more toxic and disliked institution, Schumer’s decision had negative consequences….


[X-Twitter, via Naked Capitalism 03-17-2025]

Nate Bear

Always worth a reminder that Obama inherited ICE as a fledgling agency, increased its budget 300%, established a nationwide network of detention centres and expanded the 'secure communities' enforcement program from 14 counties under Bush Jr to all 3,181 jurisdictions in America



Trump’s transactional regime

It's the Trauma Stupid: Hurt People, Hurt People 

[LA Progressive, via God’s Spies, March 20, 2025]

Anyone paying attention to politics knows that Trump’s second term has been marked by a gleeful cruelty. The blizzard of executive orders, freezing overseas assistance to the world’s poor, firing masses of federal workers and targeting domestic safety nets pick up where his first term left off.

“We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected,” boasted Russell Vought, who is now Trump’s Office of Management and Budget director, in speeches before 2024’s election. “We want to put them in trauma.”

[Thomas Neuburger: “This long piece is not just about what trauma is inflicted by Trump and his followers, but what trauma they’ve suffered that they’re now exporting.”]

Trump gave wounded swathes of the electorate a permission slip to hate immigrants, those transgendered, every diverse Democratic constituency, with special emphasis on educated coastal “elites” and its “lying media.” The irrational hate mobilized against Democrats resulted in many MAGA voters acting like the most crazed sports fans, known for their rigid, sometimes violent, home-team loyalty.

Daniel J. Siegel, a clinical professor of psychiatry at the UCLA School of Medicine, further explains the powerful appeal and draw of leaders who exude hostility and authoritarian impulses.

“People may actually feel excitement that someone in the public eye is expressing aggression, or assertion, the opposite of impotence,” Siegel said. Such traits can feel empowering to those who lack agency and power in their lives, he explained. “It is like a child wanting to be with a parent who will protect them.”


Resistance

Guest Post By Newark Mayor Ras Baraka: Democrats Cannot Afford To Wait— The Storm Is Here

[downwithtyranny.com 3-20-2025]


80 Teslas damaged at once at Canadian Showroom

Bill Addis, March 21, 2025 [Daily Kos]

Tesla has gone so far as turning on the Sentry mode on all the cars at service centers and showrooms. They start recording when there is suspicious activity around the car.


Musk: Tesla has activated security cameras on vehicles at dealerships

[CBS News, vis MSN 03-21-2025]


Conservative / Libertarian / (anti)Republican Drive to Civil War

Project 2025 Tracker

Project 2025 Tracker began as a humble spreadsheet created by /u/rusticgorilla, combined with /u/mollynaquafina's vision for making this information accessible to everyone through a dedicated website.


Beyond My Wildest Dreams’: The Architect of Project 2025 Is Ready for His Victory Lap 

[Politico, via Naked Capitalism 03-17-2025]


Will-to-Power Conservatism and the Great Liberalism Schism

Stephanie Slade [Reason, October 2020 issue, via Semafor]

By virtue of representing the correct vision of the good, these conservatives say, they have every right to use the coercive power of the state to interfere with others' choices….

...an increasingly restless group of writers and thinkers at places like First Things and the Claremont Institute who say America has tried classical liberalism—and it failed us.

These "post-liberals" believe it's time for a conservative politics that stops worrying about protecting individual liberty and starts worrying about attaining the common good. Generally speaking, that means embracing "strong rule" by a government tasked, among other things, with "enforcing duties of community and solidarity in the use and distribution of resources," as the Harvard law professor Adrian Vermeule put it in a March essay for The Atlantic….

...New York Post opinion editor Sohrab Ahmari, in a now-infamous 2019 essay for First Things, called upon conservatives to accept the hard truth "of politics as war and enmity." All societies have rulers, the Will-to-Power Conservatives seem to be saying; what matters above all else is ensuring that our tribe is dominant.

Don't take my word for it. In a recent symposium published by The American Conservative, editor of American Affairs Julius Krein (echoing his colleague Gladden Pappin) complains that "contemporary conservatism" lacks "a serious approach to wielding political power." Hillsdale College's David Azerrad argues that conservatives must learn to be "manly," "combative," and "comfortable" using "the levers of state power…to reward friends and punish enemies." And Claremont's Matthew J. Peterson insists that "conservatism must not merely make arguments…it must act on them, wielding 'regime-level' power in the service of good political order to do so." ….

For Will-to-Power Conservatives...: By virtue of representing the correct vision of the good, they say, they have every right to use the coercive power of the state to interfere with others' choices. In place of equal rights under the law, it's error has no rights. This is no way to achieve the common good.


The (anti)Federalist Society assault on the Constitution

America Is Watching the Rise of a Dual State

Aziz Huq, March 23, 2025 [The Atlantic]

On September 20, 1938, a man who had witnessed the rise of fascism packed his suitcases and fled his home in Berlin. He arranged to have smuggled separately a manuscript that he had drafted in secret over the previous two years. This book was a remarkable one. It clarified what was unfolding in Berlin at the time, the catalyst for its author’s flight.

The man fleeing that day was a Jewish labor lawyer named Ernst Fraenkel. He completed his manuscript two years later at the University of Chicago (where I teach), publishing it as The Dual State, with the modest subtitle A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship. The book explains how the Nazi regime managed to keep on track a capitalist economy governed by stable laws—and maintain a day-to-day normalcy for many of its citizens—while at the same time establishing a domain of lawlessness and state violence in order to realize its terrible vision of ethno-nationalism.

Fraenkel offered a simple, yet powerful, picture of how the constitutional and legal foundations of the Weimar Republic eroded, and were replaced by strongman-style rule in which the commands of the Nazi Party and its leader became paramount. His perspective was not grounded in abstract political theory; it grew instead from his experience as a Jewish lawyer in Nazi Berlin representing dissidents and other disfavored clients. Academic in tone, The Dual State sketches a template of emerging tyranny distilled from bloody and horrifying experience….


Sunday, March 16, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – March 16, 2025

Week-end Wrap – Political Economy – March 16, 2025

By Tony Wikrent


Jaime Raskin Asks Us To Help Make A FOIA Tsunami

Beryl Stone, March 11, 2025 [DailyKos]

From Raskin:

Today I filed a formal demand for access to my personal data obtained by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and Elon Musk. I encourage all U.S. citizens to join me in doing the same.

Elon Musk should have been more careful in what he wished for, Carol. DOGE recently dodged lawsuits about its seizure of citizens’ personal data by telling courts that it is a legitimate government agency entitled to extract this information. What Elon Musk apparently did not realize is that this statement triggers DOGE’s obligation to comply with citizen demands to see and—if need be—correct their personal information under the Privacy Act. It also allows every citizen to find out what other agencies or outside parties have been made privy to our information.

Last night, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an injunction commanding DOGE to comply with citizen requests under the Freedom of Information Act. FOIA encompasses the Federal Privacy Act of 1974, which entitles any citizen to access personal information held in any U.S. government records system.

By visiting the link on my website HERE, you can fill out the Privacy Act request form and mail it in directly to DOGE. This newly recognized federal agency, which has been systematically accessing government computer data systems, now has an obligation to respond to specific information demands from any of the 340 million U.S. citizens who exercise their legal right to defend their privacy and establish the security of their personal information.

Trump not violating any law

'He who saves his Country does not violate any Law'


Trump Orders US Military to Plan Invasion of Panama to Seize Canal: Report

Brett Wilkins, March 13, 2025 [CommonDreams]

U.S. officials familiar with the planning said options for "reclaiming" the vital waterway include close cooperation with Panama's military and, absent that, possible war.


Legal Fight Underway as Trump Invokes Alien Enemies Act of 1798 for Deportations

Jessica Corbett, March 15, 2025 [CommonDreams]


DHS Official Explicitly Equates Protest to Terrorism in 'Stunning' Interview

Julia Conley, March 13, 2025 [CommonDreams]


Trump visits Justice Department for speech that breaks all norms

Perry Stein, Jeremy Roebuck, Derek Hawkins, March 14, 2025 [Washington Post, via msn.com]

DHS has begun performing polygraph tests on employees to find leakers NBC News, via Naked Capitalism 03-10-2025]



Trump Is Fighting His Court Losses With a Surprising Legal Tactic

Matt Ford, March 15, 2025 [The New Republic]

...Shortly after Trump issued an executive order in January that purported to end birthright citizenship, federal courts in three different states blocked it from taking effect. All three courts generally held that the order was plainly illegal under both the Fourteenth Amendment and a century and a half of Supreme Court precedent.

On Thursday evening, the Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to intervene in an unusual way. The administration did not quite ask the justices to overturn the lower court injunctions altogether. Instead it asked them to end the practice of so-called “universal injunctions” against the federal government and rule that the lower court’s injunctions have no effect beyond the litigants themselves….


DHS Detains Lead Negotiator of Columbia Gaza Solidarity Encampment, Claiming “Activities Aligned to Hamas” 

[Drop Site, via Naked Capitalism 03-10-2025]


Columbia Bent Over Backward to Appease Right-Wing, Pro-Israel Attacks — And Trump Still Cut Federal Funding 

[The Intercept, via Naked Capitalism 03-10-2025]


Tightening the Screws: Columbia as Early Focus of Conservative Revenge on Universities

Yves Smith, 03/15/2025 [Naked Capitalism]


‘Project Esther’: The Right-Wing Group Behind Project 2025 Has a Plan to Crack Down on America’s Pro-Palestine Movement 

[Zeteo, via Naked Capitalism 03-10-2025] From October, still germane.


The Abduction of Mahmoud Khalil 

[Unpopular Front, via Naked Capitalism 03-13-2025]


The disappearance of Mahmoud Khalil is a trial run

Jonathan M. Katz, March 10, 2025 [The Racket]

They think they've found a wedge, and they're going to use it….

What the Trump administration is counting on is that millions of Americans will lose those deeply rooted instincts when they see that the detained man in question has an Arabic name, that he is of Palestinian descent, and that the protests he participated in were against the government and his university’s support for Israel’s mass slaughter in Gaza.

They are counting on that because their goal—overtly stated today by the president—is that the detention of Mahmoud Khalil will be “the first arrest of many to come.” Those, including some purported liberals, who are cheering right now would do well to pay attention to the president’s specific warning: that they are targeting students who engaged in “engaged in pro-terrorist, anti-Semitic, anti-American activity,” a threat that will loom large as other kinds of protests bubble up among an increasingly restive public….



PROFESSOR AT CENTER OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY DEPORTATION SCANDAL IS FORMER ISRAELI SPY 

[MintPress News, via Naked Capitalism 03-13-2025]


After Banning the Associated Press, Trump Is Now Targeting Specific Journalists That He Wants to See Fired

Pam Martens and Russ Martens, March 10, 2025 [Wall Street on Parade]


USAID employees told to burn or shred classified documents 

[NBC, via Naked Capitalism 03-12-2025]

[TW: If Trump intended to “drain the swamp” by dismantling the Deep State — not just seek retribution on his opponents — he would be keen to find and preserve the documents implicating the Deep State.]


Yesterday in Court

Joyce Vance, March 14, 2025 

Judge Beryl Howell held a hearing Wednesday afternoon in Washington, D.C., in the case filed by the Perkins Coie law firm against President Trump over the executive order he signed that is little more than an attack on the firm because Trump doesn’t like some of the clients they’ve represented in the past. That is not what executive orders are for, and Judge Howell pressed pause on this one, granting a temporary restraining order (TRO) that stops its enforcement for now. But the issues under consideration here are bigger than just one law firm….

Finally, Judge Howell found that issuing a TRO was in the public interest. Trump is using the presidency to pursue “what appears to be a wholly personal vendetta” against the firm. Without a TRO, she reasoned, lawyers across the country would live in fear of representing clients whom the president might not like, and that “threatens the very foundation of our legal system.” She explained that courts in other cases have held that our justice system is based on the fundamental basis that it works best when all parties have representation, and the “chilling effect of this EO threatens to undermine our entire legal system and the ability of people to have access to counsel.”….

This executive order is dark, authoritarian stuff. If presidents can, for no reason or for bad reasons, decide that individuals or businesses are operating contrary to the national interest and strip them of their ability to make a living and of other rights, then we are no longer a democracy. So even though this is “just” a TRO, it’s a big win for Perkins Coie, but also for the legal profession, the rule of law, and democracy. Presidents shouldn’t be able to use the power of the presidency to retaliate against people they don’t like and prevent lawyers from representing their clients. Wednesday, a federal judge said so and told Trump no.


Army Corps knew Trump's water release order in California's San Joaquin Valley was a waste

James Ward, [Palm Springs Desert Sun, via USAToday]

The Washington Post reported Friday that the Army Corps of Engineers knew President Trump's order in late Janurary to release San Joaquin Valley reservoir water wouldn’t reach Southern California as he promised.

The President had said the water release would help prevent more Southern California wildfires, but local water experts say that was "virtually impossible."

Around 2.2 billion gallons of reservoir water from Terminus Dam at Lake Kaweah and Schafer Dam at Lake Success in Tulare County were sent into the San Joaquin Valley. That water is stored mainly to irrigate crops during the spring and summer growing seasons….

“A decision to take summer water from local farmers and dump it out of these reservoirs shows a complete lack of understanding of how the system works and sets a very dangerous precedent,” said Dan Vink, a longtime Tulare County water manager, in February.

Congressman Jim Costa (D-Fresno), representing parts of Tulare County, and Sen. Alex Padilla (D-California) both wrote critical letters about the reservoir water release.

"An unscheduled release of water at this time of year, when there is little demand for irrigation water and a snowpack that is below average, poses grave threats to a reliable water supply this year," Costa wrote. "This could increase the cost of water for farmers for this crop year exponentially due to dry conditions anticipated."….



Heather Cox Richardson, March 13, 2025

...That’s not how Trump portrayed the sudden release of water. After talking to reporters about the upcoming congressional budget fight, he suddenly pivoted to Los Angeles, and from there to water. "I broke into Los Angeles, can you believe it, I had to break in,” he said. “I invaded Los Angeles and we opened up the water, and the water is now flowing down. They have so much water they don't know what to do. They were sending it out to the Pacific for environmental reasons. Ok, can you believe it? And in the meantime they lost 25,000 houses. They lost, and nobody’s ever seen anything like it. But, uh, we have the water—uh, love to show you a picture, you’ve seen the picture—the water’s flowing through the half-pipes, you know, we have the big half-pipes that go down. Used to, twenty-five years ago they used to have plenty of water but they turned it off for, again, for environmental reasons. Well, I turned it on for environmental reasons and also fire reasons but, ah, and I’ve been asking them to do that during my first term, I said do it, I didn’t think anything like could happen like this, but they didn’t have enough water. Now the farmers are going to have water for their land and the water’s in there, but I actually had to break in. We broke in to do it because, ah, we had people who were afraid to give water. In particular they were trying to protect a certain little fish. And I said, how do you protect a fish if you don’t have water? They didn’t have any water so they’re protecting a fish. And that didn’t work out too well by the way….”


Men DOGEbags at Work

Musk Shares Claim That Stalin and Hitler Didn’t Murder Millions: ‘Public Sector Employees Did’ 

[Haaretz, via Naked Capitalism 03-14-2025]

[TW: Foor over two decades I’ve tried to explain that bipartisanship with the other party is impossible because today’s (anti)Republicans are indoctrinated with and fervently believe neo-confederate economic policies—that government is and always has been bad. I have argued that there is no appeasing today’s (anti)Republican Party. They refer to us as “demonrats” and worse.

[But the leadership of the Democratic Party is quite cozy rubbing shoulders with Republicans. They go to events and dinners with Republicans, and chum it up. I was angry but not surprised when Obama yukked it up with Trump at President Jimmy Carter's funeral two months ago. Or when his wife Michelle embraced George Bush in September 2016.

[I’ve had arguments with Democratic precinct captains, county commissioners, county Dem Party chair people, city council people, and a couple people on the state party board and DNC. I once spoke with the chair of the Democratic Party in a nearby County to urge her to run for Congress so that she could face off against Republican fossil Howard Coble, who had been in Congress for 30 years. Her answer was that she simply couldn’t because her family were friends with the Cobles “going back a long way.” I am not making this up.

In 1992 — 33 years ago — Bill Greider wrote Who Will Tell the People: The Betrayal of American Democracy. In the “Introduction: Mutual Contempt,” Greider wrote,

...a peculiar dimension has developed in modern politics. Politicians are held in contempt by the public. That is well known and not exactly new in American history. What is less well understood (and rarely talked about for the obvious reasons) is the deep contempt politicians have for the general public….

A Washington lobbyist, a former congressional aide with close relations to influential Senate Democrats, described the perspective with more candor than is allowed to politicians. "This city is full of people who don't like themselves, don't like their jobs and don't like their constituents — and I mean actively don't like their constituents," the lobbyist told me not long ago. "I'm convinced one of the reasons they are in session so long is that members of Congress have gotten used to being here and they don't like going home where they have to talk to a bunch of Rotarians and play up to local leaders who are just dumb as stumps. They prefer to be here, to be around people they know and like and who understand them — lawyers, lobbyists, the press and so forth." (p. 17)

[I’ve personally cornered a couple members of Congress — I grabbed their hands tightly and refused to let go while I told them that there can never be any honest bipartisanship, and that there would never be an economic recovery of widely shared prosperity until Wall Street was destroyed. I did that to Tom Perez when he was DNC chair. They all squirmed and blanched or turned purple and tried to get away asap. The leadership of the Democratic Party is simply not interested in hearing the truth. Let alone fighting for it.

[The leadership of the Democratic Party must be replaced en masse. I used to be against term limits, but I would now support then if term limits would help us discard octogenarian oligarch lackeys like Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin. ]


Love of a Nation — Our leadership classes’ lack of love for their own people is dissolving our societies

N.S. Lyons, March 13, 2025 [The Upheaval]

...Yet, at least among our ruling classes, this natural reciprocal love between citizen and nation, which sustains our countries and our societies, seems to have long since frayed. This is no great shock, given that in our age the very idea of nationhood is itself decried, or outright denied, the nation-state stripped of the nation, the world reduced to a network of special economic zones. A man cannot love a special economic zone. Nor can its administrators possess any special feeling for its temporary inhabitants.

This grim status quo is no accident, however. It is the result of a deliberate, 80 year conspiracy against love, conducted out of fear. As I’ve argued before, after WWII, with the trauma of war and totalitarianism haunting the world, the American and European leadership class resolved that these evils should never again threaten society. And they concluded that the emotional power of nationalism had been the central cause of the 20th century’s catastrophes, leading them to make anti-nationalism the cornerstone of the liberal establishment consensus that came to dominate culture and politics after the war.

The philosopher Karl Popper, in his sweepingly influential 1945 book The Open Society and Its Enemies, denounced the idea of national community writ large, labeling it disastrous “anti-humanitarian propaganda” and smearing anyone who cherished his particular homeland and history as a “racialist.” Theodor Adorno, who set the direction of American psychology and education policy for decades, classified natural loyalties to family and nation as the hallmarks of the “authoritarian personality” that drove the common man inexorably toward fascism.

But the aversions of the post-war elite ran deeper than a philosophical anti-nationalism. As R.R. Reno writes, the visceral imperative became to fully banish all the “strong gods” that fueled conflict, meaning all those “objects of men’s love and devotion, the sources of the passions and loyalties that unite societies.” Strong bonds and strong loves of any kind – of family, nation, truth, God – came to be seen as dangerous, as sources of dogma, oppression, hatred, and violence. The peaceful and prosperous “open society” the post-war establishment set out to instantiate would, as Reno puts it, “require the reign of weak loves and weak truths,” with all dangerous sentiment subordinate to the rule of cool rationality and tepid impartiality….


DIGITIZING THE FISC (pdf)

Rohan Grey, via Naked Capitalism 03-13-2025]

On the constitutional implications of Trump’s BFS-DOGE takeover.


“The President Wanted It and I Did It”: Recording Reveals Head of Social Security’s Thoughts on DOGE and Trump 

[ProPublica, via Naked Capitalism 03-13-2025]


These Are the 10 DOGE Operatives Inside the Social Security Administration

Makena Kelly and David Gilbert, March 13, 2025 [Wired, via CommonDreams]


Trump’s Third Rail… The sneak attack on Social Security

Robert Kuttner March 11, 2025 [The American Prospect]

...In the past two weeks, there were four separate sneak attacks. First, plans were announced to cut the Social Security workforce by 12 percent, or 7,000 employees. The Social Security staff is already at its lowest level in decades relative to population….

On March 7, the Social Security Administration also announced that people who inadvertantly get too large a check through no fault of their own will lose 100 percent of their benefits. And the Trump administration briefly tried a bizarre foray in Maine, where parents were told they could no longer register a newborn for a Social Security number at the hospital and instead had to visit one of the state’s eight Social Security offices, according to an email sent to Maine officials. This was reversed after a day.

In addition, detailed testimony released on March 7 in a federal employee union lawsuit, given by former associate Social Security commissioner Tiffany Flick, lays out the extent to which Elon Musk and his pawns have gone in their effort to gain access to confidential Social Security data. This information could be used to violate personal privacy, undermine confidence in Social Security, make selective benefit cuts, or even disrupt payouts, all in the name of looking for largely nonexistent fraud. According to The Washington Post, even Trump’s handpicked acting Social Security commissioner, Leland Dudek, warned senior staff that Musk’s DOGE troops are running roughshod at the agency.... 


A Federal Judge Roasts the DOJ’s “Sham” Excuses for Trump’s Mass Firings 

[Slate, via Naked Capitalism 03-14-2025]


Inside Elon Musk’s ‘Digital Coup’ 

[Wired, via Naked Capitalism 03-15-2025]


“The President Wanted It and I Did It”: Recording Reveals Head of Social Security’s Thoughts on DOGE and Trump

Eli Hager, March 12, 2025 [ProPublica]

In a recording obtained by ProPublica, acting Social Security Commissioner Leland Dudek portrayed his agency as facing peril, while also encouraging patience with “the DOGE kids.”


Strategic Political Economy

Monopoly Round-Up: The Mar-a-Lago Accord, and Trump Seeks a Google Break-Up 

Matt Stoller [BIG, via Naked Capitalism 03-10-2025]

...a deep dive into two items. The first is the incessant rumors on Wall Street about what is known as the “Mar-a-Lago Accord,” a potential Trump initiative to restructure the role of the dollar. The second are some actions the Trump antitrust enforcers took this week to lay out their approach to competition policy, including seeking a break-up of Google and trying to block a private equity roll-up.

What’s surprising about both of them is that they reveal something I didn’t expect about this second term of Trump, which is that this time he doesn’t seem to care about the stock market. I’m not a fan of Trump, but that attitude, if it’s real, is refreshing.

Let’s start with the “Mar-a-Lago Accord,” which is the rumor of a deal to solve Trump’s dissatisfaction with the role of the American dollar in the global economy. The basic dilemma comes out of the negotiations after World War Two, during which the U.S. decided to allow most global trade to be conducted in dollars so as to break up the European imperial system. The idea was that instead of having a British or French empire in which trade happened within their systems, trade would be free among all nations. The U.S. served as the security guarantor through its Navy, and as the financial guarantor through the dollar.

When the U.S. was big relative to the rest of the world, and when the U.S. controlled exchange rates through aggressive public power, the fact that the dollar had to serve as the domestic currency and a global currency didn’t matter so much. But starting in the late 1950s, economist Robert Triffin noted what became known as the “Triffin dilemma,” which is that if a country has to supply the global reserve currency, it will become effectively an exporter of money, and that export will be so lucrative it will destroy the rest of the reserve currency nation’s economy….

In 1971, economist Nicholas Kaldor warned the U.S. that its status as a reserve currency provider and its lack of public controls over the global system would have a devastating impact. These policies would, he said, transform “a nation of creative producers into a community of rentiers increasingly living on others, seeking gratification in ever more useless consumption, with all the debilitating effects of the bread and circuses of Imperial Rome." And so it has. It’s not that Americans lost out to foreigners, it’s that U.S. corporate leaders sold out America, with the help of foreigners.

Both Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trump’s Council of Economics Advisor Chair Stephen Miran understand and want to address this problem. Miran wrote a widely cited report on America’s Triffin problem…. 

On Friday the DOJ had to submit an updated proposal, and this version was the first chance we had to see what the Trump people thought. It was their moment to either roll back what Biden sought, or keep it intact. And largely, the Trump DOJ maintained the aggressive remedy proposal against Google put forward by the Biden administration. As Lee Hepner put it, what was just “filed in US v Google Search shows Trump DOJ digging its heels on Chrome divestiture, removal of all search defaults, and data disgorgement.”….

Meanwhile, the Trump Federal Trade Commission under Chair Andrew Ferguson issued its first merger challenge this week, proposing to block a private equity acquisition of medical device coating maker Surmodics by private equity firm GTCR, which owns a competitor Biocoat. These two entities, if combined, would control more than half the market for “hydrophilic coatings,” which are special coatings that work really well inside the body when maneuvering medical devices. They are used for things like operating within a “blood vessel in the brain, for example—without damaging sensitive tissue or vital structures.”

Wall Street dealmakers are extremely angry at this merger challenge, because they were expecting a more lax regulatory environment….


Neoliberalism and a Healthy Population Are Incompatible

Richard Murphy [Funding the Future, via Naked Capitalism 03-13-2025]


A User’s Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System (pdf)

Stephen Miran, November 2024 [Hudson Bay Capital]


Johns Hopkins Plans Staff Layoffs After $800 Million Grant Cuts

Liz Essley Whyte and Nidhi Subbaraman, March 11, 2025 [Wall Street Journal, via Naked Capitalism Coffee Break 03-14-2025]

Local and international health research efforts are already winding down as the university braces for even more potential cuts

Part the Third: Who Funds the Research that Provides the Foundation of Our Healthcare?  From 2023, but still germane: Comparison of Research Spending on New Drug Approvals by the National Institutes of Health vs the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2010-2019:


Funding from the NIH was contributed to 354 of 356 drugs (99.4%) approved from 2010 to 2019 totaling $187 billion, with a mean (SD) $1344.6 ($1433.1) million per target for basic research on drug targets and $51.8 ($96.8) million per drug for applied research on products.


This was covered previously in Patents and Intellectual Property in Biomedical Science: A History in Two Tales.


Tipping Point: The Politics of Water Insecurity in the Middle East 

[Center for Strategic & International Studies, via Naked Capitalism 03-11-2025]

The Middle East is no stranger to water scarcity and violence. For centuries, conflict has exacerbated water insecurity and vice versa. But the region is now at a tipping point. Groundwater aquifers are running dry or becoming contaminated, populations are exploding, and borders are more hardened than ever, making resettlement—a time-tested survival strategy—impossible.


Why Republican Tax Cuts Always Cause A Financial Crash (updated March 2025)

Tony Wikrent, March 14, 2025 [real-economics.blogspot.com]

[TW: I updated this to include Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, which led to a collapse of the repo overnight funding market in September 2019. The Fed moved quickly to limit the damage, and was successful in avoiding any public or Congressional scrutiny as it poured in over $6 trillion in loans over a number of months.]


Global power shift

Trump White House has asked U.S. military to develop options for the Panama Canal, officials say 

[NBC News, via Naked Capitalism 03-14-2025]


Oligarchy

Tax Cuts Are Theft: An Amplification

Sara Robinson, August 10, 2010 [ourfuture.org]

Dave points to the practical effects of a piece of conservative theology that deserves a bit of deeper drilling. It's this: Conservatives believe that only private individuals should hold wealth. They do not believe in commonly-held public wealth of any kind. And that's why they feel perfectly free to raid the vast legacy that our ancestors have accumulated and stewarded for us over the past 230 years….

...What they've stolen from us and arbitraged away isn't just our own money; it's the vast accumulation of civilizational wealth that was bought with the blood, sweat, tears, endless sacrifice, earnest planning, and bold dreaming of a dozen generations of American ancestors, and then bequeathed to us to ensure our own futures. Each of those generations received it in trust from the one that came before, added its own unique contributions to it, and then passed it on as an endowment to the next. As time compounded the gift, the legacy got richer; and our sense of who was entitled to share in the bounty got broader....

It's only when you think about our common wealth the way the world's richest families do -- as a bequest from a long line of distinguished ancestors, as a vast common resource base that provides us with extraordinary material comfort today, and as a sacred trust that we must manage and multiply on behalf of generations yet to come -- that you can really begin to understand the sheer magnitude of everything they took from us.

The thieves didn't just steal our houses, our retirement funds, our careers, or our tax money. It went far beyond that. They also stole the family jewels -- the vast infrastructure that's been built up for centuries by generations of foresighted Americans, now collapsing into uselessness. They defunded the great universities, crowded our kids into classrooms like factory farmed chickens, and are shutting down the magnificent state and national parks. And they're also stealing our future, committing us to endless debt, sucking the marrow out of our international standing, foreclosing our opportunties, making it impossible to solve looming problems, and forcing us to hand off to our children a far more meager legacy than the one we received….

Here's the irony: the people who did this to us did it precisely because they also understand wealth in these generational terms…. So, if they understand this, where's the disconnect? Why couldn't they respect the public's need to manage our common wealth the same way they manage their own private wealth?

The disconnect is this: In the conservative worldview, it's right and legitimate for private families and corporations to accrue generational wealth, and build great dynasties. But it's absolutely wrong for the democratic masses to accumulate wealth that way; or to collaborate, via the government, to ensure that all of their children will have a birthright sufficient to open the doors to their dreams.

Maggie Thatcher told us outright: "There is no such thing as society. There are only individuals and families, and their interests." And if there's no such thing as society, then society has no right to accumulate wealth -- via taxes, investment, or any other means. Viewed this way, a conservative might even think it's a virtuous thing to defund and defraud the public out of any capital it does manage to acquire….


The Dark MAGA Gov-Corp Technate — Part 2 

Iain Davis, March 13, 2025 [Unlimited Hangout]

In continuing to unpack the ideologies of the oligarchs who are part of the new Trump administration, Iain Davis examines how their ideas are being translated into policy. He considers the consequent infrastructure rollout that is preparing the US and the world for an imminent Gov-corp Technate within a multipolar world.


Mark Carney: Technocrat Superstar and Eco-Warrior Takes the Helm of Canada

Matthew Ehret, March 10, 2025

Mark Carney can best be described as one of the most important insiders and mascots for the oligarchy, serving as the UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance, former investment banker for Goldman Sachs, World Economic Forum Trustee (alongside fellow Oxford trainee Chrystia Freeland), former governor of the Bank of Canada and then the Bank of England and the Chair of the Financial Stability Board from 2011-2018, where he oversaw the growth of the very derivatives time bomb which was designed to take down the trans Atlantic financial system in a future controlled detonation.

In 2024, Carney was even made President of the queen of all think tanks: The Royal Institute for International Affairs (aka: Chatham House,) whose American branch was set up in 1921 as ‘The Council on Foreign Relations’.


The carnage of mainstream neoliberal economics

Hatching a Conspiracy: A BIG Investigation into Egg Prices

Matt Stoller [BIG, via Naked Capitalism 03-10-2025]


Fowl Play: How Chicken Genetics Barons Created the Egg Crisis 

Matt Stoller [BIG, via Naked Capitalism 03-13-2025]


Trumpillnomics

Walmart clashes with China after asking suppliers to absorb tariffs 

[Axios, via Naked Capitalism 03-14-2025]


China questions Walmart over response to Trump tariff costs

[Nikkei Asia, via Naked Capitalism 03-14-2025]

Chinese government agencies, including the Ministry of Commerce, summoned Walmart representatives this week after the U.S. retailer urged suppliers in China to offset President Donald Trump's tariffs with substantial price cuts, according to Beijing's state media.

A post on Wednesday by Yuyuan Tantian, a social media account linked to state broadcaster CCTV, said the retailer was called in the previous day. It said that Walmart's alleged demands on Chinese suppliers risk "disrupting the supply chain and harming the interests of businesses in both China and the U.S., as well as American consumers," and thus may "breach commercial contracts and undermine the stability of market transactions."….

"If Walmart continues down this path," the Yuyuan Tantian post warned, "it may face consequences beyond a government summons."….

"Walmart doesn't want to be the company that Trump calls out for raising prices because of tariffs, so they are trying to force suppliers to eat it to some degree," said Cameron Johnson, senior partner at Tidalwave Solutions, a Shanghai-based supply chain consultancy….

"Once the additional tariffs hit 35%, that's the threshold when companies and industries start to say we have to move out of China completely," Johnson said. "The problem is where else are you going to make those products? We are out of options. Moving supply chains takes years, if not longer."

[TW: Trump has probably destroyed WalMart’s business model.]


CAN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ARBITRARILY TAKE MONEY FROM ANYONE’S BANK ACCOUNT? FEDERAL GOVERNMENT’S MUGGING OF NEW YORK CITY FOR FEMA FUNDS SUGGESTS YES 

Nathan Tankus, [Notes on the Crises]


USDA ends program that helped schools serve food from local farmers 

[AP, via Naked Capitalism 03-14-2025]


Administration cancels meteorologist disaster training 

[The Hill, via Naked Capitalism 03-14-2025]


They’re not capitalists — they’re predatory criminals

[X-Twitter, via Naked Capitalism 03-14-2025]

Meant to make it clear with the present-tense "is," but my point was that I think an unknown number of serving members of Congress may be getting paid off in crypto, just like the President is.

Jacob Silverman
@SilvermanJacob
The next Bob Menendez is being paid in crypto, not gold bars and watches.

There should be an investigation (Congressional, IG, whatever) into who's buying $TRUMP, $MELANIA, and $WLFI, and who's investing in his companies, but somehow the people who are supposed to enforce the law seem to have disappeared.



[The Lever, March 10, 2025]

Money laundering and tax evasion for all who can afford it. Amid a huge rise in tax evasion and money laundering scams, Republicans are deregulating cryptocurrency, killing off corporate transparency rules, and downsizing the agency that audits tax returns.

The Senate just voted to exempt crypto from the regular rules. At Big Crypto’s urging, the upper chamber just voted to kill a rule that would have subjected the cryptocurrency industry to the same tax disclosure rules as normal brokers. The 70-27 bipartisan vote shows the power of crypto campaign cash. And reminder: Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) promised the industry favors while stumping for former Vice President Kamala Harris at a fundraiser last fall.

Farewell to the Corporate Transparency Act. Trump’s Treasury Department just declared that it will refuse to enforce the anti-money-laundering law requiring shell corporations to tell law enforcement who their actual owners are. Trump’s own Justice Department defended the 2021 Corporate Transparency Act, which was upheld by a Trump-appointed federal judge and the U.S. Supreme Court. But now Trump is celebrating as his administration halts enforcement of the law.

Defunding the tax police. As the Internal Revenue Service potentially loses half its staff, employees are warning that the agency’s audits of the wealthy could soon end. For every dollar the IRS spends, it generates between $5 and $12 in revenue — and when the agency audits filers making $10 million or more, it returns $13,000 every hour. Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission is dismantling itself as you read this.


Health care crisis

What to know about the new disease outbreaks in central Africa 

[AP, via Naked Capitalism 03-10-2025]


America Is Sleeping on a Powerful Defense Against Airborne Disease

Roxanne Khamsi, March 11, 2025 [The Atlantic]

Treating clean indoor air as a public good would have protected Americans against more than COVID-19….

For decades, experts have pushed the idea that the government should pay more attention to the quality of indoor air. In his new book, Air-Borne: The Hidden History of the Life We Breathe, the journalist Carl Zimmer shows the long arc of this argument. He notes that Richard Riley, a giant in the field of aerobiology who helped show that tuberculosis can be airborne, believed that individuals shouldn’t have to ensure that the air they breathe is clean. Just as the government regulates the safety of the water that flows into indoor pipes, it should oversee the safety of air in indoor public spaces.

More than half a century before the coronavirus pandemic, Riley positioned this idea as an alternative to requirements for widespread masking, which, he said, call for “a kind of benevolent despotism,” Zimmer reports. If cleaner air was the one of the best ways to reduce the societal burden of disease, then the two best ways to achieve it were to push people to wear masks in any public space or to install better ventilation. The latter approach—purifying the air—would mean that “the individual would be relieved of direct responsibility,” Riley reasoned in a 1961 book he co-authored: “This is preventive medicine at its best, but it can only be bought at the price of civic responsibility and vigilance.”….


Information age dystopia / surveillance state

Meta stops ex-director from promoting critical memoir 

[BBC, via Naked Capitalism 03-14-2025]


Dodge Chargers Now Have Pop-Up Ads at Every Stoplight… Just What Nobody Asked For 

[FuelArc News, via Naked Capitalism 03-12-2025]


Amazon Uses Arsenal of AI Weapons Against Workers

Daniel Boguslaw, March 13, 2025 [The American Prospect]

A study of a union election at an Amazon warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama, shows that the company weaponizes its algorithmic surveillance tools to prevent organizing.


Climate and environmental crises

‘Global weirding’: climate whiplash hitting world’s biggest cities, study reveals 

[The Guardian, via Naked Capitalism 03-14-2025]

Climate whiplash is already hitting major cities around the world, bringing deadly swings between extreme wet and dry weather as the climate crisis intensifies, a report has revealed.

Dozens more cities, including Lucknow, Madrid and Riyadh have suffered a climate “flip” in the last 20 years, switching from dry to wet extremes, or vice versa. The report analysed the 100 most populous cities, plus 12 selected ones, and found that 95% of them showed a distinct trend towards wetter or drier weather.


EPA launches attack on ‘holy grail’ of climate science — and dozens of enviro rules 

[Politico, via Naked Capitalism 03-14-2025]


New Report Finds Urgent Need to Expand Energy Supply to Meet Rapidly Growing Future Demand

[American Clean Power Association, March 10, 2025]

Electricity demand in the United States is projected to surge by an unprecedented amount over the coming decade, according to data released today by S&P Global Commodity Insights….

The full US National Power Demand Study will describe a critical gap between the current energy supply and future needs. It predicts U.S. electricity demand will surge by 35-50% between 2024 and 2040. This is primarily due to AI data centers and new manufacturing activity in the short-term whereas electric vehicles (EV), space-heating electrification, and broad economic growth underlie the long-term dynamics. This demand is growing faster than the supply of new energy solutions that could power it — data centers and manufacturing facilities, for example, take about three years to build versus development and construction times of typically five or more years for new power generation to come online, creating an urgent need for faster policy action on permitting and grid interconnection and an all-of-the-above energy strategy within the sector....

 

Creating new economic potential - science and technology

CPKC hydrogen locomotive enters mainline service

Kevin Smith, ​​​​​​​March 12, 2025 [Rail Journal]

NORTH American Class 1 CPKC has introduced its first high-powered hydrogen locomotive into regular mainline service. The locomotive is hauling bulk freight trains carrying coal mined by Elk Valley Resources as CPKC tests performance in “challenging real-world operating conditions.”

The retrofitted AC4400CW locomotive is based in Golden, British Columbia. CPKC has confirmed on social media that it was successfully refuelled for  the first time at a fixed refuelling station, the first installed outside of Alberta, on March 6.

The locomotive is coupled to a prototype hydrogen tender eveloped by HGmotive that can be connected to any compatible hydrogen-powered locomotive. The design is based on a tender for compressed natural gas (CNG) developed by HGmotive in 2019.



Phoenix to build multibillion dollar purification plant to make wastewater drinkable by 2030

Phoenix wants to recycle wastewater into drinking water by the end of 2030 and share it with the Valley.

The plan is to build an advanced water purification facility and treat, then reuse millions of gallons of wastewater that would have otherwise been discharged into the Salt River.

The investment would provide Arizona cities a significant new drinking water supply, which is vital as they work to lessen their dependence on the shrinking Colorado River and diversify their water sources.

The multibillion-dollar technology, called direct potable reuse, or "tap to toilet," by critics, cleans water that goes down a home's drains and sends it back for reuse. It will be added to the 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant southwest of downtown and purify 60 million gallons per day — enough water for about 200,000 households per year….


Trump’s transactional regime

Blackrock Becomes a Power Player in Global Shipping — With Help from Trump 

[WSJ, via Naked Capitalism 03-13-2025]


Analysis Details How Trump's Circle Could Be Profiting From White House Crypto Policies

Eloise Goldsmith, March 14, 2025 [CommonDreams]


Resistance

Seeing Things For What They Are — And not for what they used to be

Hamilton Nolan, Mar 15, 2025 [How Things Work]

...Things have changed in America. There are deep undercurrents that have been exerting pressure from below—the relentless evolution of global capitalism, the growth of inequality, new forms of technology jumbling the world of information—and then there are things that have changed rapidly, closer to the surface. It was possible to use a certain frame of reference that worked pretty well in the American political system for the past 40 years or so. But now that frame is out of date. It is worse than useless. It is misleading. It is detrimental, because the answers it spits out, the explanations it gives, the strategies it recommends for specific situations, are all based upon old data and old wisdom that no longer works. The frame of reference that guides many of the people who, unfortunately, dominate the Democratic Party in Washington is like a flood map that was drawn up before climate change. They keep using these same old formulas that worked back then, ignoring the rising water as it creeps up to their necks.

Reagan and Bush and Clinton and Bush Jr. and Obama all to varying extents did awful things and all to varying extents are responsible for the progression of the state of our politics to this point, but they also all believed themselves to be constrained by a set of guidelines, norms, and political realities that no longer exist. Even their most immoral policies were shaped to maneuver through public opinion and economic demands and historic traditions and laws that have now, effectively, disappeared. The playbook that political veterans used to operate in that old world is a set of directions to a house party that is already over. If you show up there you will only find an empty house. The action is elsewhere now. Chuck Schumer continues to pull up in front of that empty house each morning, blinking vacantly, knocking on the door with a bottle of wine in his hand, wondering what is taking so long.

Here are a few notable ways in which many (not all) of our political and media and business and intellectual leaders have failed to update their priors for current times: The federal government is now controlled by a political party that is nakedly, not bashfully, racist, and hopes to eradicate the past century’s worth of racial progress; economic policy is being dictated, stupidly, by a small group of zealots who do not understand economics; the primary concern of the president now is vengeance, and he is going to use the tools at his disposal to enact vengeance upon his endless list of enemies in a way that could surpass McCarthyism; “civil liberties” mean nothing to those who control the federal government now, and will likely provide little protection from that vengeance in the real world; the law, and the power of the courts to enforce laws that constrict the behavior of the federal government, is very much in question, and it is distinctly possible that within the next year or two the law is exposed as toothless in the face of the president’s will, and therefore the law should not be relied on as the primary guard rail of our democracy now; voter suppression is about to reach extremes not seen in generations, and outright election theft based on shoddy racist claims of voter fraud is extremely likely in upcoming elections at all levels; the US government is going to lose its status as a reliable source of information—economic statistics, scientific data, and more—as official information is manipulated for partisan gain in unprecedented ways, a development that will be devastating for almost all fields of knowledge, and for the economy; the federal government is being run by people who want to eradicate the government’s functions, except to the extent that those functions can be used to crack down on foreign and domestic enemies; many people are going to be jailed and deported and potentially killed unjustly in the very near future, by the president and his loyalists; institutions that imagine themselves to be proud, ethical, important parts of the fabric of America are going to cower in fear and abdicate their responsibilities in ways that their own leaders would scoff at right now. We are not living in “The West Wing.” We are living in “Goodfellas.” It does not have a happy ending….


Trump Ignoring Court Orders Is New Grounds for Impeachment, Says Pro-Democracy Group

Jessica Corbett, March 15, 2025 [CommonDreams]


Resisting This Fresh Hell

Nan Levinson, March 13, 2025 [LA Progressive]

...Such responses will undoubtedly involve a variety of approaches. These are likely to range from the immediate to the long haul; from small, local acts to ease individual lives — accompanying immigrants through the legal process when their residency is imperiled, for example — to more traditional activities like lobbying, petitioning, and supporting civil liberties organizations, or even movement-building and large-scale actions aimed at challenging the power of Trump and changing our very political situation.

We’ve already seen individual acts of principle, along with small communal acts of subversion. When someone in the Air Force took the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion purge literally and cut a video about World War II’s Black Tuskegee Airmen from a training course, a senator decried it as “malicious compliance.” In Silicon Valley, there was a “quiet rebellion” when Meta workers brought in certain sanitary products to replace those removed from men’s bathrooms by order of their boss, Mark Zuckerberg. A DOGE hiring site was besieged by mock applications from well-qualified Hitlers, Mussolinis, Francos, and a Cruella De Vil. Then there was that World War II anti-fascism Simple Sabotage Field Manual, downloaded at least 230,000 times since 404Media made it accessible online. Ways to gum up the works suggested there include, “Cry and sob hysterically at every occasion, especially when confronted by government clerks,” and my fave, “Act stupid.” 

….Which leads me to Gene Sharp, an unsung but influential theorist of nonviolent resistance, whose pragmatic ideas about peaceful protest were picked up by popular liberation movements around the world in this century. He argued that the power of governments depends on the cooperation and obedience of those they govern, which means the governed can undermine the power of the governors by withdrawing their consent. “When people refuse their cooperation, withhold help, and persist in their disobedience and defiance,” he wrote, “they are denying their opponent the basic human assistance and cooperation that any government or hierarchical system requires.” While his suggestions for challenging power included individual resistance, he advocated a nonviolent insurgency big enough and sustained enough to make a country ungovernable and so force the governors to truly pay attention to the governed.

How big? Political scientist Erica Chenoweth has suggested that about 3.5% of a country’s population participating actively in nonviolent protest can bring about significant political change. If that’s accurate, an effective resistance would need about 12 million Americans taking to the streets. And yes, that’s a lot, but keep in mind that the women’s protest march early in Trump’s first term gathered more than five million Americans on a single day, many of whom were part of a political protest for the first time….


Bill Clinton, The Genesis Of The Corporately-Owned New Dems And The Decline Of The Democratic Party — The Democratic Party Won't Fix Itself— It Has To Be Forced On Them

Howie Klein, March 11, 2025 [downwithtyranny.com]


Conservative / Libertarian / (anti)Republican Drive to Civil War

Right-Wing Donors and Foundations Spent $1 Billion to Keep People From Voting Last Year

Aaron Dorfman, March 12, 2025 [The American Prospect]

In the 2024 election, more people didn’t vote than voted for any one candidate: 36.33 percent of eligible voters nationwide stayed home (or had their vote thrown out); 31.78 percent voted for Trump; 30.84 percent voted for Harris; and 1.06 percent voted for a third-party candidate.

There are, of course, many reasons why so many eligible voters didn’t vote. Right-wing funding of election deniers and anti–voting rights organizations are definitely part of the answer. Millions of people wanted to vote but were prevented from doing so. Others did vote, but their vote was wrongly rejected and was never counted.

That didn’t happen by accident; it was planned for and funded. In just three years—2020, 2021, and 2022—more than $1 billion flowed from more than 3,500 foundations and high-net-worth donors to about 150 nonprofits that advocate purging people from the voting rolls, restricting vote-by-mail or early voting, removing drop boxes, and other ways of making it harder for people to vote.

Using internet research and Form 990 keyword analysis, researchers at the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy assembled a list of organizations that:

  • promoted fabricated or overblown threats to election integrity such as noncitizen voting, voter fraud, and corrupt voter registration drives;
  • were mentioned in Project 2025’s implementation plan;
  • were linked to state preemption policies, which prevent duly passed municipal and county laws from being enforced; or
  • were linked to policies criminalizing protest at the state or local level.

Based on this list of nonprofit names, we used Python and compilations of IRS Form 990 data published by Giving Tuesday to match filings by these anti-democracy organizations to filings by their institutional funders…. 

Yesterday, Don Moynihan noted that Trump and Musk, veering from ideological targeting to cronyism, are building a new spoils system. He wrote that a fundamental democratic norm is that laws are implemented as written and applied equally to all. Yet under Trump— and encouraged by Musk— we see a blatant erosion of this principle. He withheld emergency aid from blue-leaning areas, and now his administration has institutionalized this approach, turning budget implementation into a spoils system. Republican lawmakers are able to protect their districts from cuts, while Democratic areas bear the brunt. DOGE (and other departments) openly favor GOP requests, making government services contingent on political loyalty.

Trump and his allies have also embraced impoundment— illegally withholding appropriations to reshape spending in alignment with their own priorities. This unconstitutional power grab effectively nullifies congressional authority. Republicans in Congress, despite knowing that Trump is stripping them of their power, go along with it because they benefit politically. “While they publicly decry government spending,” wrote Moynihan, “they privately ensure their own districts are spared from cuts. DOGE is accepting requests from Republican officials to reverse cuts in their jurisdictions. It is a form of spoils system in reverse: your pet projects will be spared from elimination.


Arlington Cemetery website drops links for Black, Hispanic, and women veterans

Matt White, March 13, 2025 [taskandpurpose.com, via DailyKos]

The website for Arlington National Cemetery "unpublished" links to lists of notable graves, walking tours and educational material pertaining to Black, Hispanic and women veterans, as well as some Medal of Honor recipients….

Cemetery officials confirmed to Task & Purpose that the pages were “unpublished” to meet recent orders by President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth targeting race and gender-related language and policies in the military.


The (anti)Federalist Society assault on the Constitution

Trump Justice Department sends letter to Mayor Brandon Johnson about alleged antisemitism on campuses

Alice Yin, [Chicago Tribune, via YahooNews]


The Justice Department issued a notice Thursday to Mayor Brandon Johnson over alleged antisemitism on Chicago campuses, the latest escalation of President Donald Trump’s crackdown on liberal cities and educational institutions.

A Justice Department-led task force requested Johnson and the mayors of New York City, Los Angeles and Boston discuss with federal officials their responses to antisemitism at their cities’ schools and colleges over the past two years, according to a news release. The statement says the mayors “may have failed to protect Jewish students from unlawful discrimination, in potential violation of federal law.”….