tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4413935813892441553.post298718175930121420..comments2024-03-20T02:13:42.947-05:00Comments on real economics: To the critics of "Bernienomics"Jonathan Larsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05217670446743983955noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4413935813892441553.post-75590697287168618682016-03-03T10:13:08.534-06:002016-03-03T10:13:08.534-06:00Sanders climate change policy is not ambitious eno...Sanders climate change policy is not ambitious enough (a trillion when it needs to be 100 trillion)...but his economics policy is ridiculed as too ambitious...seems like the classic battle in politics of just to make a change when the political will for change is missing. Political will being measured by people actually sending money or getting in the streets protesting for change.<br /><br />So I propose we get the money from the new sin tax on legal marijuana, whereby the tax money MUST be used to implement green energy in our community. It will be a jobs program, education will be improved not by throwing money at it, rather it will be improved by kids wanting the education needed to get a green energy job.<br /><br />Then entice black into supporting this policy by making Reparations in the form of black-owned green energy companies (not some silly 19th century land and mules). Immigration too should be paired to jobs needed to implement the green energy solutions...no green energy job, no immigrant visa.<br /><br />If Sanders made these part of his economic policy--I'd predict a landslide.Mikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05252804186064393926noreply@blogger.com